AmericanSaxeCoburgGothic
Happy to be here! Goal is to post the most exclamation points.
Never on reddit. Never on Twitter.
User ID: 1919
Makes me think too of the Rich Dad Poor Dad philosophy (take on debt, buy assets) vs Dave Ramsey (save and budget; highly debt averse). In a high inflation environment makes more sense to take one debt and buy assets.
Its like a world-wide Dutch Disease where the industry of focus is some technology/ finance and some select entertainment sectors; and all other occupations not tangentially related won't keep up with inflation.
With rate increases will FIRE people get burned? -On a more serious note, I think the current inflation is doing serious harm to income inequality. Either through education or skills you are either in a dynamic industry where you get rewarded with pay increases so you maintain or increase your purchasing power or you're in a stagnating uncompetitive industry where your real income is eroded by inflation. This advantages only increases as you go through life, buying a house instead of renting and adequately saving for retirement vs renting and not being able to save.
I agree a lot is left unsaid in the original post. But I suspect what the OP is reaching toward is that a child has should have a right to a biological mother and father (a reasoning that I think could only rely on ideas of Natural Law) and technological or legal advances have blown past that bench mark without any reflection.
I'll take the discussion in a different direction: 'planned orphanhood.' There was a news story where an Israeli mother's only child son was killed in army and she made the decision to have his sperm harvested in order to one day have grandchildren. If people have a 'right' to children, do people also have a 'right' to grandchildren? I don't have anything concrete to say about the original topic of surrogacy or the planned orphanhood, but I believe the advances of technology in this area have come without pauses for legal implications, and seeing ethics on other topics change so much in person's lifetime (not my own I'm not that old!) I think in the future the ethics of this area will probably be changed.
When you say 'doomed' is where I'm lost. Can you expand on what you mean? There's an entire discipline of science that studies the allocation of resources given constraints- economics. The usual exogenous hand-waving response to your concern would be that technology will advance, whatever that means, or barring that energy prices will increase and probably lead to less consumption. Controlling for inflation are current prices for gas at the pump even close to their historical highs? Certain cut backs seems overdue and necessary; in the era of zoom why is business travel an expense that can be written off of taxes? If you believe in this impending doom how have you acted? If you started to hoard crude oil today do you actually think you would be able to do so profitably? In short I see the future being different maybe drastically so, but doom seems a stretch too far given the world I perceive around me.
What is the hysteria of the Eucharistic Congress? By extreme belief do you mean the belief in the real presence of Jesus in the Eucharist, since that is Catholic doctrine, before and after 1930.
Is your post on the religious discrimination in a country where a conflated religion/ethnicity were politically disenfranchised for centuries?
On your second point do you have any sources on this not so well known Irish phenomenon?
For the Magdalene Laundries in regards to the Catholic Church I see it as similar to the case of the Canadian Indian schools. This more reflects the views of the wider society I don't think this can be pinned on Catholicism since a secular attempt at the 'problems' in the same milieu with the same resources would have likely reached a the same outcome. Other Catholic countries like Italy and Portugal didn't treat unwed mothers the same way. Society saw this 'problem' of unwed mothers or in Canada's case integrating native children into a settler society, and delegated it to the social workers of the day, underpaid religious communities of members often taking vows of poverty.
Chatting with ChatGPT would only increase the training data!
Can you expand upon what expectation of the future changes is exactly fueling your crisis? To my thinking when the AI of driverless cars can't make left turns and while AI can create text and art it is just pattern regurgitation, this isn't despair-inducing to me, but I also haven't been paying close attention.
Is the 'fight' Nate Soares is talking about just on regulation? Since while I agree up until now that's been absence, I see AI regulation as something government could eventually codify. I think Silicon Valley giants are firmly in the Military Industrial complex and the recipients of government research dollars.
Rebel Wilson has had recent weightloss and is no longer an example of what you're writing about. She might even be too thin for comedy now. Plus-sized people in comedy has existed for a while (Fatty Arbuckle, 1/2 of the duo Laurel and Hardy) and in woman more recently but I would say predates the fat acceptance movement (Roseanne Barr, Melissa McCarthy).
Portmanteau of Grant Woods painting and a royal dynasty.
I've wondered about the future of this heightened thought and sensitivity on gender as well. The comparison that jumps to mind is the Class Consciousness of nascent and early communism and what that lead to. Class consciousness was a revolutionary lenses you in which to view of history but it was incomplete because it fails to adequately explain how the world works. I think of how schools topics like dialectic materialism were at one time taught the world over and how little bearing they have on the world in 2022; such wasted effort and resources. I think the current gender centered views and thinking is a similarly reductionist social view which offers a novel view of society but is also incomplete. In the future I see gender being more important than it was in the past but I perhaps optimistically don't see the enthusiasm to carry its continued primacy in social thought.
- Prev
- Next

Or the Lancet study for hydroxychloroquinen that had more covid subjects reported than covid cases for some countries. Who fakes a clinical trial to show something is ineffective if they don't have reliable cure waiting in the wings?
More options
Context Copy link