BANNED USER: Angry troll looking for a fight
GematriaUnlimited
dependariat
I'm serious.
User ID: 267
Banned by: @Amadan
and this isn't a problem that can be solved, it's just life.
this is why law and order matters, and why lawlessness is such a threat to our civilization.
This makes me uncomfortable because it reminds me so much of those times that the Democrats would push narratives about Russia and Trump. I remember making arguments at length that regardless of whether or not Trump was 'polite' the office of the presidency should still command respect; I thought these were strong arguments and maybe I still do. When are we going to try to be a more uniting force instead of continuing to hunt down scandals involving relatives?
Kushner being sent to build peace in the middle east was unorthodox in the appearance of nepotism, but in unorthodox times we need unorthodox solutions. I dare call this preoccupation on Biden's spawn obsessive. You're trying to hold 'the system' to a consistency it never had. Trump did things that angered the left and that made me glad, but as I think about a divided country I feel some shame for embracing that power, for now I see in you someone who is angered, much as the left was, over trivial, irrelevant, and imagined corruption.
Do you need to be told that Trump lost, get over it? Do you need to be told to look to the future and not the past? What are you looking for? What are you hoping to find?
Explain to me, if you would, your preoccupation with Fauci.
All I know is the government said take the vaccine, so I took it. I knew there was a chance of side effects but I judged them to be negligible. Vaccines aren't scary.
Otherwise you would lose every elections and never project power.
The right just lost elections because they can't let go of Trump. Trump doesn't project power he projects weakness. He used to be able to do it but his time is done. DeSantis has some strong points but I'm still hoping for someone a little better at silencing wokeness without feeding division.
It sounds to me like you're resisting an obvious conclusion: you need religion. The choice is between tradition and its challenging but earnest calls to a better life and the degeneracy of rainbow churches.
You need religion because you boast about your sexual relationship with your wife online.
You need religion because instead of keeping your family business in the family, you make political hay of it to strangers.
Talk to the people you need to talk to, don't just vent helplessly.
At the end of the day you need someone who recognizes that American government has to be for Americans, and that's Trump.
I believe this vindicates the front-line doctors and makes mass murderers of the censors, as well-intentioned as those who smashed sparrows for Mao.
Something I've been thinking a lot about as I see a well-intentioned president Trump struggle against the power in this country is the fallibility of human government. Are you sure you're not overreacting to human fallibility?
Trump was on the right side of history, and I think it's important to retain belief that there is a right side of history and people can be on it.
The CDC was more concerned about getting the vaccine out than perfect safety. Does that really make them mass murderers?
I would impeach Biden for being old and will accept any pretext whatsoever.
Wait, are you telling me Trump ordered the FDA to bypass safety protocols to get the vaccine out??
I'm really hoping that the Republican wave coming our way (I have some positions on Republicans winning both the House and the Senate) will cool the fire on leftwing extremism. We need a de-escalation in this country and it's never going to happen while left-aligned people continue to belabor their most noxious positions.
A sound defeat might be just the thing to correct some of the worst excesses of the morality police.
It's not like anyone objects (or should object) to shots taken at Biden. I'm starting to feel like this place may have a problem.
The beginning of the Imperial era in Roman politics led to civil war over the imperial seat which was the true cause of the fall of the Roman Empire.
Authoritarian dictators are an inherently incompetent and violent form of government, and anyone who aspires to return us to savage government is factually incorrect about an important section of human history.
Dictators provide no benefit over a temporary executive. Removing a bad dictator requires a civil war which cripples a polity for an entire generation.
Don't put words in my mouth.
Litigation of conspiracy theories by conspiracy theorists are uninteresting.
It sounds to me like when you say "directionally correct" what you mean is "wrong in every factual respect."
Concerns about the US electoral system aside, Trump did not win the 2020 election. There was no substantial voter fraud.
I like being both directionally and factually correct. For instance: Trump is a convicted felon.
The people will seek an emperor when they figure out that the oligarchy bureaucracy is uncontrollable otherwise.
Anyone who aspires to return us to savage government is factually incorrect about an important section of human history.
I will just say the same thing again
But clearer, and plainer. Thank you for abiding by the rules.
This is likely to be the case again, as men realize that attempting to succeed by 'following the rules' amidst anarcho-tyranny is fruitless.
This sounds to me like saying "we need to return to roving gangs in order to escape anarcho-tyranny." I reject the choice to return to roving gangs that you are espousing.
Attempting to succeed by 'following the rules' is obviously fruitless because one of the most powerful, richest, successful, handsome, men on the planet was just convicted of 34 made-up felonies
This is false. The felonies weren't made up. A jury of our peers convicted Trump of real felonies. He is a convicted felon. Facts don't care about your feelings.
I am not obligated to indulge your desire to return to roving gangs because your pet politician committed a crime. I'm against returning to roving gangs. Criminals should be punished in the court of law. That's what happened today.
Those sound like conspiracy theories to me. I don't buy it. I don't think anyone should buy it.
Trump is a convicted felon. Convicted felons lie.
It is somewhat irresponsible to mention dharma without also covering dukkha.
It would be one thing if Trump successfully punched out the establishment but he drowned in controversies of his own making instead.
He's done a far better job of standing up to the wokes than any other politician if you ask me.
Watching the press briefing Trump gave... something in me finally broke.
I don't think it matters what you call Trumpism. I think that we've spent all of this time propping up a broken system with a broken man. I recoiled from the accelerationists who said they were using Trump to break the system because that just seems so destructive and vile, no better than the people who break Starbucks windows.
I thought: maybe he's a good man. Maybe we should give him a chance. And the Democrats are so vile in their baseless slander.
But the Dermocrats didn't make him give that speech on January 6th.
Hillary Clinton should have been jailed and she should still be in jail. There is nothing to be gained however from holding on to a tool that has run out of use.
I mean is there anyone out there who didn't understand why Democrats were in shrill hysterics about fascism? The man like to scare them, and I don't know if I believe that he had so much fun terrorizing the libs (it's so easy and someone has to do it) that he fell into it, or if... well, I just can't go down that road yet.
This criminal wasn't worth all of this divisiveness in our politics. Maybe the divisiveness was already there.
I regret my support for former president Trump and I want him to withdraw from public life. Nixon had the decency to step down when his time was up.
I might even vote for the old rascal myself as I view this lawfare as both morally wrong and deeply destabilizing.
How can you restabilize a situation in which an active participant has committed to destabilizing it by propagating myths about a stolen election?
Is Biden the enemy of the people, as has been claimed by Trump?
I wouldn't like to take such an allegation lightly. But I have to admit, there's something to be said for recognizing a spade as a spade. It's impossible to talk about in leftist controlled spaces, but woke politics does sometimes act like this higher-dimension being which occupies minds and turns them towards the possession of power in the service of ritual idealism.
This country is divided and maybe it's time to recognize those divisions more openly. Maybe those who have been forced to keep mouths shut for fear of being attacked or losing jobs need to stand firm.
Maybe conservatives need to hold on to the right to speak about demographics in a straightforward fashion.
Maybe it's better to hold onto the strong fighter you have instead of indulging in the hope that this time there might be a compromise, even as history shows the limits, even pitfalls, of such willingness to come to the table.
I wish I had more of a firm argument to submit, but I can only ask the question and see what the responses stir in my mind...
Your thoughts?
I don't believe it was the 'most secure election ever' but pandering to the crybabies does not make them stop crying.
It's in everyone's interest that we secure our election from crybabies who believe that crying about their boomer's election defeat is an acceptable political strategy.
Punish defectors. It is the path to stability, whatever the defectors would have you believe.
- Prev
- Next
I wish we could have disposed of Trump in time to have a real conservative candidate this November.
More options
Context Copy link