inappropriatecontent
Nihil Concierge
No bio...
User ID: 691

Kids are impressionable, they tend to believe and accept what adults tell them. They’re pretty conformist as well...
Yeah, it's crazy when kids are like this.
It's amazing how few people grow out of this. Like @netstack and @ArjinFerman both talked about, it's rare and difficult for people to be willing to change their mind.
I believe there is a view supported by certain talmudists that celibacy is not required within the bounds of marriage and the perimeter of the Olympic Village
I think this deserves to be a top-level post for the next few weeks. Sort of like Trans-National Thursdays. Supreme Court Saturdays?
This latest episode of Iran just kind of attacking all its neighbors is pretty uncharacteristic at least.
I dunno—isn't Iran attacking it's neighbors something Leonidas would be familiar with?
Sorry to be confusing--but I've genuinely never removed a seat from a vehicle that had seats that could fold down to make room for cargo. I wonder if it's because I was raised in the blue tribe?
Well, they're perfectionists in Lebanon. The leader of the HRC doesn't walk around with an internal monolog that asks "boy, I've never fought a battle with the NRA, let's check that off the list." Maybe he should. I hear the ACLU used to think that way, and possibly still does.
Being a sailor myself, it pains me to admit that the most plausible explanation is that the skipper of the Newnew Polar Bear did, surely, understand something was wrong--but hoped it was no big deal, and no one would notice. In fact, finding an anchor that was dragged for nearly 200 klicks on the floor, just "a few meters" from the damaged cables and gas lines makes it just to easy for me to know exactly what a Newnew Polar Bear sailor felt like after two or three hours on the deck crew trying to get the anchor hauled up when the XO shouts over the 1MC, "Fuck the anchor, we're about to hit an seabed pipeline--cut the chain NOW!"
They almost made it.
So much for the Skipper's dream of commanding the more prestigious ship, Oldold Polar Bear.
I'd just like to take a moment here to plug the most important part of my view on Trump, which comes from Andrew Sullivan's interview of the author Michael Wolff. I won't drop too many spoilers, but Wolff, for all his factual errors, seems very correct to me when he talks about the language most journalists use being inadequate to describe Donald J. Trump.
Here is the interview: https://open.substack.com/pub/andrewsullivan/p/michael-wolff-on-the-trump-threat
also Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/michael-wolff-on-the-trump-threat/id1536984072?i=1000534947059
and PodBay: https://podbay.fm/p/the-dishcast/e/1631290292
and how do I format links using markdown? Also, I'm just starting the book it's based on and I'll write it up a little as a top-level post when I'm done.
Don't apologize--I was trying to be clever, which is always a hit-or-miss endeavor.
Anyway, my question is: how do you count what percentage of women in, say, America have the sort of relationship you describe? How does OP? Because both of you describe things that do happen, but how often they happen is very, very difficult to count. The only place I can even think to look is the GSS, and I can't find any questions on there that really seem germane.
Man, the one about keeping an eye on CPA was a huge part of my life for about three and a half years. We had a really thin standing orders binder, but the night orders always included the line about CPA and surface contacts.
Because that's what someone with much more well-adjusted family relationships and emotional communication skills than either of us would do.
My family was about...other things. Like reading at a 11th grade level before you turned 9, or not talking about your feelings, or winning state debate tournaments, or not talking about your feelings. Sometimes, for a break, we didn't talk about our feelings.
I use the same federal subsidy and have asked the major providers here in California (Lifeline and NET10 wireless) for flip-phones—they only offer cheap android smartphones (or even tablets). Can you tell me the name of your provider so I can get a flip phone too?
You said something about being able to write not having done you any good in your last post, but I don't see it. You're a couple ex-wives who are smarter than you away from being Hemingway
How would one demonstrate which way the arrow of causation points here? I'm not close enough to publishing to tell pull from push.
I'm inclined to favor Bukele, on the basis that iron fist policing methods should work.
Iron fist policing works very well, for a very limited and specific definition of work. They stop the organized criminal activity in an instant—and an instant is also how long you have before the tactics go from 100% effective to 99%.
If you're waiting for an election, crime might not be back noticeably until after the vote. If you have an actual plan to address underline issues, implementation is so much easier right after a crackdown that the best name for these tactics isn't iron fist or crackdown; it's "step one." It's basically got to be step one of absolutely any plan, good or bad, or that plan won't work.
But since it can't accomplish anything on its own, the only thing that guarantees iron fist policing won't work is expecting it to.
My favorite part of the UC site you linked to is this: "As a reminder, candidates do not need to belong to a particular group or demographic, or to hold particular viewpoints, to be successful in this [getting a diversity score]."
I went through the first couple the sections of the evaluation and scoring rules, and a college administrator employed in a U.C. DEI office qualified for the highest possible score in both.
Im just starting this series of posts. I found part two very useful: it helped me map what ideas Hannah Arent is famous for, and move them from "my unconscious biases" to "someone else's very convincing and extremely useful framework."
I'm very happy to find this with all seven sections finished, ready to be cued up for my next couple morning commutes. It was clearly more than just a couple hours work to do this, and I really appreciate the effort!
Exactly. I feel like blocking people on this site runs counter to the spirit of engagement—heck, I'd probably make more use of a anti-ignore feature that lets someone who replied to me know: "I read your response, I don't have enough to say about it for a Motte-quality comment, but I do actively appreciate your time and am giving you the last word..."
Is there some emoji (maybe only available to and visible to users who've commented on a thread) that could mean, "I have read everything up to here, and you make some good points, but I am now politely excusing myself to take a phone call."
[So that's the anti-ignore feature, but then there's the ignore feature, which is like taking a fake phone call—but 100% guaranteed not to ring at the exact wrong moment so everyone notices like at that dinner party I made incredibly awkward last summer. And it's easy to code, because they're the same button.]
'freedom of speech' was a much less-held value anwyhere in something like the 18th or 19th centuries
Even in the 18th century, there was somewhere with people who held the freedom to speak among the most important values they could list.
Top of the list, in fact. Number one of 10.
We just flat out aren't competitive on non-military vessels.
So true. I spent 2007 to 2011 on board a two decade old Navy minesweeper that was supposed to be replaced by the littoral combat ship (LCS) which entered service in like 2012 I think.
But LCS was such a disaster that it was not capable of any of its basic missions, and the first few have already been decommissioned while my minesweeper is still in service!
There's no shortage of examples of American hypocrisy in the exercise of power...
Although I think more and more that reflects the nature of the exercise of power than the nature of America. The nation's founders were wiser when they checked or limited it than when they exercised it.
There's a wonderful scene in the Australian mockumentary where John Clarke's character, an administrator of the 2000 Olympic Games, is in the back of a press conference where his boss, a minister, is addressing a scandal. Clarke hears the minister say that "Character X has my complete support" and immediately says into a cell phone, "do you know who's in line for X's parking space?"
American military personnel in Japan are expected to obey local drinking laws. While I was 24 when I was first stationed there, there were quite a few of my younger shipmates who were in America on their 20th birthday and Japan on their 21st and thereby deprived of the (profoundly vapid) drinking birthday celebration.
My sister was 20 when she and my dad flew over to see me and so she got to enjoy a legal pint of Kirin Ichiban in a Yokohama jazz club with us.
The issue I believe is the Japan Gymnastics Association bylaws which forbid these vices.
It's certainly not French laws; isn't the Parisian drinking age second trimester?
Vote for Antifa McSlaughterkulaks, but make sure Embezzlea Demqueena is your second choice!
That's one helluva bumper sticker.
Really? I was sure they were supposed to be a suburban Jewish family—but that might be because every time he hears the books mentioned, my dad exclaims, "They don't go to synagogue either!"
But there may not be textual evidence for his reading. I've mostly been able to avoid mentioning books since childhood
More options
Context Copy link