site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 31, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

24
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Any fans of the Great British Bake Off here? I think this season has been a case study in the mechanisms by which wokeness latches on and does its best to ruin things. I'm so sick of people talking about how offensive Mexican week was. If you ask me, I really have no idea what was so offensive about it. Acknowledging that Mexican culture and food exists is not the same as being racist towards Mexicans. Also, since when are Mexicans even considered to be oppressed, and worthy of people getting outraged over? Have Mexicans historically been oppressed, especially by the British?

Following Mexican week, now, I guess the outlets all saw that claiming offense at GBBO was a great way to get more views, because every week I see at least one article about how viewers were "shocked and outaged" at the latest episode of Bake Off. Often, these are related to the fact that several contestants this season aren't native to Great Britain and are not being handled sensitively enough with regards to the recipes they do and their ability to follow the instructions in the technical challenges.

Cultural appropriation is an issue that involves more nuance than the media tends to give it. The part of those complaints that made sense to me is that they didn't know what the things they were baking were and making confidently wrong comments about how they were supposed to be. See this tweet about the s'mores challenge:

me: I feel no special attachment to my american identity

paul hollywood: you see, it’s essential to carefully apply the blowtorch around the edges of the s’more—obviously we don’t want a gooey mess

me: I must throw him into the boston harbor

with the follow-up

I should clarify that the dessert featured in the technical looked delicious, I would like to eat it, the ganache and meringue sound heavenly and the digestive biscuit is a good substitute for graham cracker

but it is at best a s’more-INSPIRED dessert, not a s’more

Cultural appropriation is an issue

Hard disagree.

Can you give me some example where it is an actual issue. It's one of the topics that I have a tremendously difficult time steel-manning.

Here's a steel-manned scenario:

  • Group A oppresses Group B.

  • Group A also berates Group B's culture.

  • Group A adopts some aspects of Group B's culture.

  • Group A claims it as their own.

  • Group A denies Group B had anything to do with that activity/thing ever.

The above is the hypothetical worst possible instance of "Cultural appropriation".

And DESPITE THAT you still can't make an argument that Group A should stop doing what they appropriated from Group B. Yes you can say they are a bunch of jerks.

But (in modern times) then you end up with the reparations argument wearing different clothes all over again. Why should the son pay for the sins of the father?

Let's say you are an oppressed Briton under the cruel yoke of invading German Saxons, c.700AD. After your parents are killed and your wife and sisters are stolen by Germans as sex slaves, you are forced to toil on a turnip farm to provide food to Saxon king Hengist's armies, under pain of summary execution if the crop fails.

You are therefore filled with schadenfreude (a word of Old Saxon you picked up from your cruel masters) when the Vikings invade and do to the Saxons what the Saxons did to you. Hengist fucks off back to Jutland, a power vacuum ensues, and while you are nominally under Viking oppression within the Danelaw, the jackboot lies on the Briton neck much more lightly than it did at the start of the century. Also Viking rule leads to a lot of out-of-work Christian monks and you get one of them to teach you literacy. You write a book about your experiences...

...but you can't make any money. Because Hengist already wrote a book about the life of an oppressed Briton in the 700s. And it was very realistic too - he had intimate knowledge of the Briton plight from all the years he spent inflicting it. The book is already a bestseller and completely saturates market demand for "tragedy porn of Briton oppression". Not only did he and his relatives steal your wife and your sisters, he also stole your story: the broad strokes of your plight are filling up his coffers, not yours. He has appropriated your sad culture.

This seems unfair.

Eh, I think worse case scenario is that in a weird turn of events the North Macedonians reverse course and cements their claim over the Greek Macedonians and proceed to take not only Thessaloniki and Greek Macedonia but the full borders of Alexander's Empire.

For reference there has been a continual slapfight between the local Greeks and Slavs over the cultural legacy of ancient Macedon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Macedonia#Naming_dispute

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_North_Macedonia#Kutlesh_Flag_(1992%E2%80%931995)

This is how the topic "Cultural Appropriation" was introduced to me, and made way more sense than every other instance I've ever heard.

Agreed, and to take a different tack - if you said ok to some sort of weird cultural reparations cultural appropriation would still be fucked though, because cultural appropriation is an integral part of how cultures evolve. Mexican food today is nothing like Mexican food two centuries ago, which is nothing like Mexican food a millennium ago, because every culture is always assimilating from other cultures! It is just nonsensical.

Yes you can say they are a bunch of jerks.

I'm unclear on the distinction you're drawing between saying "If you do X, you're a jerk." and "You shouldn't do X.". I would think the former implies the latter.

Quite. Even if one can't legally stop people from doing X, it could be seen as reasonable to... start a social media campaign to highlight the jerkish behaviour; encourage boycotts of products which rely on the jerkish crux; contact distributors / employers and draw their attention to the jerkish conduct and ask them pointedly if they really want to exercise their freedom of association over the jerk, etc, etc.

Exact example of your steelman in reality--Rings of Power. Though the "reparations via descendants" part isn't relevant (yet) because this cultural atrocity is currently in progress.

I don't have a settled opinion on what should be done in this case, because I know the real answer will be "nothing, suck it up, bigot nerds."