site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  1yr ago (text post)   35024 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 28, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

16
Top Bottom New Old Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's a very interesting question as to what was going on. A genuine mistake? Guy was high/drunk/impaired in some capacity and imagined he brought a suitcase with him? Opportunistic "oooh that case looks nice, mine now!"?

I don't know if he was trying to specifically steal a woman's case to get women's clothes, he seems to have no problem getting women's wear usually (although sheesh there are some awful looking photos online where he looks like he's trying out for the edgy Zoomer version of the Joker in an arthouse movie). If it's true that there are photos/video of him travelling with the case, it sounds more like he stole the case to have the suitcase. That there are supposedly images of him flying around with the suitcase strongly indicates that; if he stole it for the content, wouldn't he have dumped the case because that wasn't what he was after?

I'm very dubious about this person (how do you refer to non-binary, anyway? "guy" is offensive, yes?) because of the dressing up but on the other hand, he (they?) do seem to at least have qualifications and experience for the job, so it's not a complete diversity and inclusion hire.

If they did steal the suitcase, and there isn't a reason (e.g. blitzed out of their head on prescription medication) then yeah, probably should be a firing offence. Robbing and thieving is a bad thing, even if the alleged new normal is not to bother prosecuting shoplifters. Even leaving aside the whole "is this a sexual fetish offence?", plain old "stealing" is enough. Another question that comes to mind is do they have a habit of doing this, like kleptomania? Will we hear about other little bits and pieces Mx Brinton picked up here and there? If so, then definitely firing and go get treatment for this.

He didn't have any checked luggage, so I'm not buying any claims of misunderstanding. This is just regular theft.

Even if it started as a mistake it became theft the moment he didn’t return the suitcase to the airline. No reason he couldn’t have brought it back after realizing.

I'm very dubious about this person (how do you refer to non-binary, anyway? "guy" is offensive, yes?)

I imagine the PC term is "person", as you guessed. Personally I would say guy, because non-binary isn't a legitimate identity, and he is a guy.

how do you refer to non-binary, anyway? "guy" is offensive, yes?

If they can commit a stereotypically male sex crime they can be referred to as a male is my view.

Qualifications aside, it still seems like a red flag for a raging case of Main Character Syndrome. My dude, get over yourself and put on some business casual.

Seriously. I am pretty damn unconcerned about what people wear to work, for the most part. But the way he dresses is just straight up trashy. It screams "I'm an attention seeking person who actively tries to offend those around me". That's not really the sort of person I would hire for any job.

I can't believe we're ruining Biden's genius plan of sticking some women's underwear in nuclear waste casks and having this guy waltz off with them for us. We were this close to solving the spent fuel issue for good, damn it.

If this guy could really manage it, maybe their career wouldn’t be so radioactive.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats