This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Steve Sailer has been suspended from Twitter for allegedly violating their rules against hateful conduct.
His tweet said
He appealed and the decision was upheld.
This is yet another way in which Elon Musk is going back on what he said in April.
It's starting to look like his attitude towards free speech isn't that different from his predecessors'.
Did Elon directly respond about this one? Some people were suspended for posting negative things about Dear Leader (ie Zelensky). When brought to Elon’s attention, he stated unequivocally the tweets were not a violation of TOS, the tweeters were unsuspended, and Elon vouched to look into it.
I imagine there are still holdovers from the prior regime. Rome isn’t built in a day.
What did they post? I couldn't find anything, all the results on Google are about the suspensions related to Musk's jet.
Basically images of Pelosi and Harris displaying the Ukrainian flag and comments about how this is America last.
More options
Context Copy link
Here’s a screenshot: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Elon-Musk-Jacks-Magic-Coffee-Shop-2.jpg
The article it’s embedded in is not about this censorship, but uses it to introduce a broader screed, practically a manifesto, against the FBI for acting as the fist of a power which works against the American people, both online through censorship and in the real world.
/images/16718142177968981.webp — EDIT: Not sure why TheMotte made a local copy. This feature could be used by bad actors to add illegal images to our site and get it shut down. Insertion of insurrectionary or subversive material could also be used as “sources and methods” to get wiretap warrants on us all and our closest associates. (Farfetched? It’s how the FBI got Operation Hurricane started, the Russia collusion investigation against Trump.)
@ZorbaTHut im kind of surprised we do hosting too. is it the architecture for profile pictures/banners? how much of a liability is this?
It's not great, but you're right in saying that it's necessary for profile pictures. In the end, if you allow users to submit any content, there are potential problems, and I'm not sure that hosting full images really leaves us worse off.
It's something I've meant to revisit at some point with some kind of review process but right now I'm just not worrying about it; it doesn't seem to be common for this attack to be used.
@DuplexFields:
Yeah, but you can do that with text also, and I ain't gonna shut down text submissions.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link