This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Men who find they need to use terms like Wonderfulness strike me as failures. It's licking their wounds. It's shifting blame for their inability to navigate adult life onto handy targets "Boo! Wonderfulness! Women are all bitches!"
That you even think "middle-aged" is a put-down shows your immaturity.
(We can swap insults all day if you want and the mods will tolerate it, or we can try to speak without using brain-dead Internet swipes. Your choice).
No, we won't. You and @Sloot both need to knock it off.
That part was hyperbole since yeah, you guys will step in and send this exact message.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Always amusing to see online women reinforce the trope of women resorting to personal attacks against a man’s status when he expresses an opinion she doesn’t like.
“Middle-aged” is not more of an insult there than “women” (or “internet” for that matter), but I see that description appears to have established residency in your head free of rent. The word I was actually most directionally on-the-fence about cutting was “snide,” but after half a thought I decided it indeed was applicable given your behavior in this thread and in general.
If I wished to try to insult you, off the top of my head there could have been the low hanging fruit of deploying impolite synonyms for “poor” and “overweight”—or, more softly, those words in themselves—for poor and overweight are descriptions of which you’ve recounted yourself (perhaps using those exact words, so they may not actually be insults at all). Even to a habitual wrong-thinker like me, it’d feel kind of like punching down just by mentioning without using-as-insult.
You have also expressed dissatisfaction with your career pathway (or lack thereof) and life outcomes in general.
I’m aware that you have time all day for riling yourself up and insulting other forum users, as well as rage-quitting and starting a new account when things don’t go your way.
Just your current account’s posting history is a Top Right Messi when it comes to number of comments on the x-axis and frequency of tantrums as a percentage of comments on the y-axis.
So yeah, when forum poster A tries to malign forum poster B for things such as “failures,” “immaturity”, “shifting blame,” “inability to navigate adult life,” it comes across as a massive case of projection and lack of self-awareness when forum poster A is older; poor; overweight; prone to histrionic, antagonistic outbursts, etc. when she sees a comment she doesn’t like.
Just beautiful apophasis. You absolutely cooked em here. HereAndGone is not recovering from this any time soon. I’m in awe of your mastery Sloot
More options
Context Copy link
Why mention middle-age, since you don't know my exact age? The amount of times men assume "gotta be old ugly hag since complaining about us liking hot young women" is laughable, and you did that exact thing there.
I am old enough to be old ugly hag! Go me, I have survived to live this long! Whether I'm sixteen or sixty-six has no bearing on 'is what I am saying true/sensible/reasonable/not flat-out crazy at least' and reaching straight away for the "middle-aged women" bit is a weakness on your part.
Should I assume you are fifteen, by your writing? I'm going to do you the courtesy of imagining you are a grown adult, without assumptions about your precise chronological state.
How sweet of you:
The mens, they always gots to reach for "DE HYSTERIA" when they can't back up their fronting.
No need to reach from my end when you dribble the ball off your foot every other trip down the court. Even your current account's posting history has discussed multiple times as to your approximate age.
Indeed, you do you.
To the extent you'd like to believe so, it'd only further your frustrations with your life outcomes.
Yes, it's the "mens" fault that they notice when you throw temper tantrums.
More options
Context Copy link
Maybe hysteria is an exaggeration, but you are justifiedly not known for your calm and businesslike responses.
Was that in doubt? Do you live in a warzone, or did you have contract killers chasing you for the last two decades?
Living to be old is an achievement gained only after much human suffering, thanks to better economic conditions, better medicine, and a little luck. Therefore, sneers about middle age are instead a ribbon of commendation for being one of the fortunate humans to live at this period, when you don't risk death before the age of five, or death via childbirth (as frequently as previously) or death from getting a cold that turns to pneumonia, or death by eating bad food that spoiled.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link