This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Mate, please stop explaining. You just sound more and more creepy the more you go on about older men and younger girls. Seven year age gaps can be a huge gulf, or not so much, depending on the age of both parties. 15 and 21 are two different phases of life. 22 and 29 are getting nearer in experiences. 30 and 37 are fine.
10 and 17 is not fine. 12 and 19 is not fine. And I've found that arguments around "why not 15?" tend to drift downwards rather than upwards in the "if 15, why not..." later development of the argument. If 15, why not 14? If 14, why not 13? If 13, why not 12 - after all in the Classical world 12 year olds were married! (as you have used as an example yourself).
As to "family condoned", that depends on the family. Were I the parent of a young daughter, I'd be highly suspicious of any 20-25 year old guy sniffing around my 13-15 year old daughter.
Paedophiles out there claiming six year olds experience sexual desire and are competent to have loving, consensual, sexual relationships with adults. Your arguments that "I'm not one of those guys" do not convince me on the grounds you are putting them. And it's becoming more and more evident your concern is "men can't get young pussy" and not "girls are being artificially debarred from forming permanent attachments leading to marriage and family".
Since you're so concerned about the poor men who are unfairly punished for their natural sexual attraction towards girls, here's a sad and sorry case of another normal man being convicted of a crime that is no crime.
How very wrong of our judgemental society to punish this man for acting on his natural attraction to the girl, who was even older than 15! Plus the hussy probably enticed and tempted him, and then tried to play the victim!
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Why are all the guys so eager to fuck teenage girls also so insistent that these girls be virgins?
Serious question, bub: You keep talking about your "lived experience." So I assume you are not a virgin. I'm not going to ask if you've ever banged an underage girl, but I am going to ask: assuming you have had sex with a virgin, why didn't you marry her?
Half the point of dating a teenager is that she is much more likely to be a virgin.
And the other half is wanting a weak, pliable and easily manipulated barely-not-a-child. Which is why I think men who do it are disreputable if not contemptible, and I feel not a lot of sympathy for the poor guy who thinks it's unjust that it's illegal to fuck a 15-year-old.
Plus, while our alt-friend claims to have married the one teenager he ever fucked, most dudes carrying this flag are not looking to do that. They just want to bang teenagers.
Do also note that some men want a lot of kids (without going through multiple women), and a younger wife very mathematically means either more kids or the ability to wait longer between babies (thus reducing the stress).
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
And does she know you are looking for fifteen year old candidates to replace her, now she's all old and used up?
Says the guy trying to convince us all that 15 is plenty old enough and men are naturally attracted to younger women and girls.
Dude, drop it. You're interested in access to underage sex, I'm not interested in facilitating people (men, women or other genders) who are interested in underage sex, and more dialogue isn't going to change that.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link