This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Well yes, it is. Transgenderism and homosexuality are traditions in our culture dating back to Roman and Greek times. If we weren't being subjected to Judeo-Christian values, her ex-wife wouldn't have felt the need to repress being transgender in the first place. And it wouldn't be such a big deal for a relationship to end because one partner evolves. All of the supposed problems with that situation are caused by artificial right wing judeo-christian morality.
...? You're arguing that in the ancient world a woman with young children being abandoned by her husband wouldn't be a big deal?
nobody is being "abandoned", the trans parent can just continue parenting without pretending to be a perfect judeo-christian Family Man. What's the big deal? Most marriages end in divorce anyway. I would have preferred if my parents got divorced right away rather than screaming at each other for 15 years, and they were both transgender heterosexuals, they just didn't get along. Imagine growing up with a dad who was so cucked he wouldn't even let himself be the gender he wanted.
Edit: snowflake mods banned me, so don't bother responding. Imagine being so sensitive you call a slight difference of opinion "trolling"
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
You should ask Elagabalus how accepting the pagan Roman world was of gender non-conformity.
The difference is that the romans would just call Elagabalus a fag and laugh about it, then go back to having anal sex with their femboy harems. I wouldn't have to listen to endless christwoke virtue signalling about family values from coping closeted homos like JD Vance. People could just do what they want without the insufferable handwringing.
Between this post and this one, I think it's obvious you are trolling and you've been given enough charity.
One week ban. Future bans will escalate sharply.
ETA Permabanned after threatening to troll harder if he was banned.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Since the Roman pagans accepted E's gender nonconforming hijinks for four years, we can call ancient world pretty accepting.
It would be unthinkable for medieval Christian ruler get away with such lifestyle even for four days.
That argument is not as strong as you might think. Roman emperors had a degree of liberty that regular Romans couldn't dream of.
The sole surviving roman novel is a comedy about roman men competing for the affections of a sixteen year old boy. I'm not sure about transgenderism, but pagan Rome does seem to have accepted homosexuality among the plebs.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Just remember, folks, trans rights will not affect your ordinary lives at all! Ignore the sixteen dozen examples of where exactly that is happening, you're just imagining it, or making a big deal out of "the biological father claims to be the mother and wants that to be legally recognised", which is nothing at all exceptional, right?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link