This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
There was neither an organized attempt to kill all the Jews nor any orders or written plans to do so. That is made-up propaganda. The lack of any documents is very strong evidence that nothing of the sort was ever organized, and the lack of documents, plans, or written orders for some alleged initiative to kill all the Jews is very well-known.
At which point you run into the question that Amadan and others have asked you in the past - account for all the missing Jews. This discussion has happened before, and the denier position leads to the pretty implausible position that the Nazis hated the Jews, wanted to kill all the Jews, and millions of Jews died, and somehow the Nazis were not involved with the deaths of the Jews. That is facially absurd.
So you quibble documentary evidence in order to distract from and avoid the headline claim - that the Nazi German state killed millions of Jews. I don't particularly care whether or not you can find a memo from Hitler; I care about what happened. And as past discussions have borne out, the evidence that the Nazis killed millions of Jews is pretty darn robust.
What does "account for all the missing Jews" even mean? If you claim 800,000 people were murdered at a precisely known location, but there's no documentary or physical evidence for the claim, it falls apart.
There isn't even a list of names or anything of those alleged 800,000 victims, they are anonymous, which is another dubious aspect of the claim.
Anonymous victims, no documentary evidence for the event, no physical evidence for the event, no bodies or mass graves, no contemporary witness account of the event. Impossible claims of 5,000 people being cremated every single day on primitive outdoor cremations with not a single observation of that operation, the smoke of which would have been clearly visible from Warsaw and even Lublin. No reports from the Polish underground of such an operation who were spying in the area.
Edit: On top of that Revisionists have already proven the Extermination camp narrative and gas chamber narrative was a lie at Majdanek. So there is already precedent for Soviet-Polish investigators lying or being wrong about such an operation at other camps in Poland.
And likewise homicidal gas chambers disguised as shower rooms were initially claimed at the Western camps but disproven after investigation. So what are the chances that all of these claims were proven false at the Western camps and Majdanek, but then they actually happened at Treblinka?
The claim was made in both the West and East camps. The West camps were investigated and the claim was disproven. The East camps were "investigated" by the Soviets and they did not allow Western observers to participate in the investigation. They modified structures post-war and claimed they were original like the gas chamber shown on tour in Auschwitz.
10% of Poles were Jewish before the war. A large number of the cities that were in the Pale of settlement were majority or plurality Jewish. An the there were many Jewish farming villages in the pale as well. Where did they all go?
Many evacuated into the Soviet Union ahead of the German advance. Many were deported into Russia by the Soviet Union themselves and likely died there or assimilated. Many did die directly by the Germans or general wartime conditions, the mortality on Poland in general was extremely high, for Poles as well. Many want to Israel, or the United States.
But if you are saying they were all gassed in shower rooms at a precisely known location, then we can review the evidence for that claim and find the weight of the evidence does not remotely justify confidence in those sensational and extremely unusual claims.
But also, like I just said in my other comment the methodology of relying on sequences of census data to assert an indisputable level of mortality is fundamentally flawed in and of itself. Pre-war estimates were revised upwards post-hoc, and post-war estimates were revised downwards post-hoc, and the only estimate that has never been revised is the 1945 estimate. So every single post-hoc revision of those estimates has served to increase the theoretical mortality of that period, coincidentally.
The mortality in Poland was especially high but we would expect that to be more evenly distributed. The pre war population of Jews in Poland was 10%. The Postwar population was virtually none and the population of in Poland is nill now. This was not according to estimated numbers but the official Polish census So where did they go? All the Jews in Warsaw just packed up and moved to the Soviet Union? The Soviet Union is not a black box you can't just through millions of people there. They kept detailed records like the totalitarian state they were and also didn't really allow assimilation in the sense that everyone had their nationality listed on their identity cards and the Soviets viewed Judaism as a nationality. There were a many totally assimilated Soviet Jews but their ID cards still said Jewish. This is why there are now pork shops in Israel because these totally assimilated Jews were still able to prove their Jewishness. Now that might make your hypothesis seem correct except the Soviet Union is also short on Jews
Vilnius and Kiev and the entire pale also have missing Jews. Because the places historically had quite a lot The numbers for this are from the Russian census in 1897 of just Yiddish speakers. Again census not an estimation. Since the 1990s we have access to the full Soviet census records and these people are not there. Nor is there evidence of a huge influx from Poland and the Soviets did keep records of this. Even totally assimilated Jews who didn't practice and eat pork were still considered Jews because the Soviet viewed them as race/nationality. These records show all kinds of other Soviet atrocities based on nationality namely Stalin's deportations they aren't sanitized. The Soviet archives were hugely open during the 90s.
As well then we get to the issue of motive. Did you know that the Soviets intensely disliked the Western holocaust narrative because they though it focused to much on Jews? They thought it elevated Jews too much when the German invasion had caused great suffering and death for all the Soviet people's the holocaust as such as a singular action was not really taught in the Soviet Union. But rather integrated into the whole narrative of the great Patriotic War. Why would the Soviets go the effort to fabricate a narrative they hate.
You know this isn't the mainstream narrative right? Which hold that more than half of the Jews killed died from overwork or more likely massacred in a muddy field in Eastern Europe by the Einsatzgruppen. Even if you proved that Auschwitz was entirely a myth you'd still half to deal with the missing Jews and the state sanctioned death squads. Which how do you deal with them do you think the Einsatzgruppen were a real thing and if so what were there purpose?
I've already explained that differentiating census data across years is only a theoretical approximation of mortality due to measurement error. And in the case of estimates of Jewish population, it seems the errors were in opposite directions pre-war and post-war, which is highly convenient for the narrative they rely on for their global status.
Did you know that the 2020 census shows an 8.6% decline in White people between 2010 and 2020? I don't mean as a proportional representation, I mean those people simply disappeared. Where did they go? Were they lured into bagel shops in Brooklyn and murdered in the tunnels under Chabad?
The problem with using these estimates for mortality is that it precludes the existence of measurement error, in particular in the cases where measurement error is incentivized by wartime narratives which it is in this case.
Yes I do, it is claimed approximately 3 million Jews were killed inside gas chambers disguised as shower rooms. So the vaunted 6 million still has another 3 million to account for. The Einsatzgruppen were real, their purpose was anti-partisan measures.
The fundamental problem is, let's say I'm correct and the "Gas chambers disguised as shower rooms" never existed. So where did 6 million deaths come from? When did they die? Where? That's not a rhetorical question, if you remove the gas chamber story then trying to tally nearly that degree of mortality is simply impossible given existing evidence. Did millions die in the ghettos? No evidence. Did millions die by the Einsatzgruppen? No evidence. If you take away the gas chamber story, there is no alternative explanation for when, where, or how those Jews were supposed to have been killed. If you disagree, I challenge you to present an alterative theory to where 6 millions Jews were supposed to have died and when. That's why the gas chamber story is clung to so dearly, there is no alternative explanation for where those ~3 million theoretical Jews were supposed to have died, and the "six million" symbolic figure is inextricable with the gas chamber story.
So lets say everything you said is correct the gas chambers never existed the camps were just labor camps and the Soviets created the death camp narrative as a psyop. Would you describe the systematic murder of three million Jews as the holocaust not happening? I wouldn't and I don't think most people would. I think an argument following that would be something like the, "camp narrative" in incorrect and caused inflated number but the holocaust still happened it just involved Jews being rounded up and shot" That seems to follow from those beliefs a lot better.
This is very convenient given that the Germans considered all Jews in the Soviet Union to be partisans. So yes their purpose was anti-partisan measures which under German classifications of the time would include eliminating Jews as all Jews were considered partisans.
But the issue is there are no Jews left. There was a whole Yiddish speaking culture in the Pale that is just gone your quibbling about exact number but the point is how ever many there were and we have records outside of the census one showing a culture here for hundreds of years they aren't there anymore. If you say elsewhere in the Soviet Union Soviet records don't show that and you can go hunt in the former Soviet Union all you want you won't find them. And given Soviet official policy was to downplay the specific targeting of Jews there was no incentive to fake that anyway.
The Germans loudly and often declared the war in the East a racial war and one of ethnic cleansing and conflict. Given that such wars almost always involve genocide and mass killing. And given the Germans were willing to implement things like murder the Polish intelligentsia to destroy them as a nation, implement the hunger plan, suspend the laws of war in the Soviet Union and plan out stuff like general plan Ost. Which explicitly involved settlement and ethnic cleansing. Why would you expect them to spare the Jews especially because the Jews of the Pale just vanished after the Germans swept over them.
You misunderstand me. It is claimed ~3 million Jews were killed inside gas chambers disguised as shower rooms. But I am not acknowledging that 3 million Jews were killed by other means. I am simply saying that if you take away the Gas Chamber story, you are left with no alternative explanation for the mortality of 3 million Jews. Did they die in the Ghettos? Did they die at the hands of the Einsatzgruppen? Did they die in the concentration camps? The evidence affirmatively refutes any plausible alternative explanation for that level of mortality by German hands. This is why the gas chamber story is so important, and they can never dispense with it without giving up the narrative entirely. Without it, there is no explanation for how the Germans allegedly killed so many Jews.
So let's say I dispense with the extermination camp narrative, does that mean I acknowledge 3 million Jews died? No. I've already repeatedly described my position, without contention, that census differentials are not a reliable estimate of mortality, in the general case but especially in this cause. I agree with Ryan Faulk's suggestion:
I think this is closer to the truth, the global Jewish population estimate is today and always has been enigmatic and politically-loaded. It is not a reliable measurement of mortality, in particular given the pattern of measurement revisions that so happen to correlate with utility to the Holocaust narrative.
Yeah, that's actually kind of my point, that this whole fucking sensational story relies entirely on Soviet investigators and records. Do you think that's a reliable basis for confidence in this narrative of millions of Jews being gassed inside shower rooms?
There's a lot of claims here so I'll deal with them in turn:
Who was it that perpetrated the Katyn Massacre? When the Germans conquered this area of Poland and uncovered the alleged mass graves, what they did was excavate the mass graves and performed autopsies to determine cause of death and attempted to identify victims. They released American POWs to observe the investigation to report on its integrity, and they invited international observers from neutral nations. Essentially, they did everything the Soviets/Poles did not do when claiming that millions of Jews were gassed inside shower rooms.
And guess what?
The Soviet Prosecution still claimed that the Katyn Massacre was carried out by the Germans at Nuremberg, bundled with the accusation that they gassed millions of Jews inside shower rooms. I do not make this point to deny the Germans murdered Poles, but to deny that this war implies some prior likelihood for the Germans coming up with some scheme to engineer Death Factories in which they exterminated millions of Jews inside Shower Rooms. That was wartime atrocity propaganda. The Soviets were moreso intent on destroying Polish nationalism to a vastly greater extent than the Germans.
There was no hunger plan, what people call the "hunger plan" was an assessment that feeding the German army would leave insufficient food for conquered Slavs, which was accurate. It was not a plan, it was an accurate projection of the prevailing situation, that it was impossible to feed the German army and the occupied locals given wartime scarcity.
Also vastly overstated, no different than citing a random Israeli minister who talks about colonizing the Sinai. There were many variations of the post-war plan for the east, none of them were confirmed because the Germans lost the war, and the most salacious variations were viewed as unrealistic even at the time. The Germans were ethnically cleansed after the war, 12 to 14 million but some estimates to 16.5 million were ethnically cleansed. I don't say this to justify German colonization plans, but to point out that such plans do not lend credence to a scheme to gas millions of Jews inside gas chambers disguised as shower rooms..
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I made those links to previous conversations because I am content with the arguments made in the past. There were millions of European Jews who vanished during WWII - that part is indisputable. This occurred alongside the conquests of a violently anti-semitic government that openly stated its loathing of Jews - that is also indisputable. It's not exactly hard to connect the dots here, and I'm not going to engage you on nitpicking details.
The more important point is that those details are in themselves a red herring, because it seems to me that, as Amadan says, even though you say that the Holocaust didn't happen, your openly-stated positions on Jewish people imply that it would have been a good thing if it had. And you can just say that! This is the Motte - you won't get banned. It's the way you pivot and dissemble that's so frustrating. You can just say what you believe.
It's this:
But this forum isn't the public, and there is no need to strategically lie here. Thus my regularly asking you, "Do you hate Jews?" You know the answer to that question, and I know the answer to that question, but you're bizarrely unwilling to say it, even here, on an internet forum for contrarian edgelords, under the cloak of anonymity, even though everybody already knows it. What is this cowardice?
It is absolutely disputable given the argument relies on subtracting a sequence of highly unreliable population estimates. Ryan Faulk (AKA the Alternative Hypothesis) had an excellent article contending with those censuses:
So all of the historical revisions of Jewish population in Europe have worked to inflate the theoretical death toll of the wartime period- except the 1945 census, they totally got that one right apparently despite the fact it would have been the most unreliable one of all.
It is especially disputable give there is no list of names associated with the claimed 2 million victims of those camps, they are anonymous. Imagine filing a missing person's report for someone who is anonymous, and then demanding the cops find the missing anonymous person- no name, no description, nothing. That is what the Holocaust does times 2 million. The reason there is no list of victim identifications, which would be evidence to prove that people were actually killed there, is because it didn't happen. It is also one of the reasons that Revisionists point out that the ban on any scientific investigation of those grounds is essentially spoliation. If these really were anonymous victims then excavating the mass graves in order to attempt to identify the victims would be SOP. But not only has that not ever happened, not a single mass grave on these sites alleged to contain the remains of two million people has ever been excavated (if they were real they would be the largest mass graves in human history, by far - AKA outliers), Jewish authorities forbid it.
Anonymous victims, no documentary evidence, no physical evidence, no contemporary witness accounts, no contemporary clandestine reports of the alleged cremation operation which would have been clearly visible in the sky to every single person from Warsaw to Lublin, no bodies, no mass graves. The exact same claims made at several other camps are proven to have been false. The story itself is absurd:
900,000 Jews were tricked into walking inside gas chambers on the pretext of taking a shower, then they were gassed with carbon monoxide from a captured Soviet tank engine- a highly unusual and exotic killing method that so happens to resemble ubiquitous delousing procedures. Then they were buried. Then they were unburied and all cremated on makeshift open-air pyres over the course of like 120 days (no less than 5,000 every single day in camps that did not have state-of-the art crematoria like the concentration camps). And then they were all reburied. And all of this escaped any documentary trace. Excavation to scientifically analyze what actually happened is forbidden.
When the Kamloops Children's Mass Graves hoax broke in the news media, I immediately predicted that the Tribes would forbid excavation of those alleged mass graves in order to protect the lie (which is exactly what has happened since, the tribal leaders give the exact same reasoning as the Jews for forbidding excavation to investigate the claim). I predicted that because it pattern-matches to exactly what the Jews did at Treblinka and the other camps. They claimed massively inflated death tolls on the basis of extremely flimsy hearsay and witness testimony and forbade any manner of scientific investigation that any rational person would expect for a crime of this magnitude.
None of us believe the Holocaust because of the evidence presented for those crimes. We believe it because we watched Steven Spielberg growing up, and as children were shown horrific footage of typhus victims and victims of Allied bombings at the Western camps which aren't even the camps that have the real alleged Holocaust mass graves that have never been excavated.
I just said that I was not interested in getting into the weeds of Holocaust denial.
I believe it is telling that you chose to engage exclusively on the point that I said I was not going to nitpick, and chose to ignore the more substantial points regarding your position on Jews.
Ah, you claim that something is indisputable while simultaneously asserting you don't want to go into the weeds and therefore I am not allowed to contest your false claims.
It is disputable, if you tell me something is indisputable but it's actually false, I'm going to contest it despite your protestation.
Well, bluntly, it is that I don't consider you a remotely objective assessor of any kind of evidence related to Jews or the Holocaust because you, at such tedious and repetitive length, clearly hate Jews.
And I think your continual evasion of that question - the way you duck and weave, unwilling to, even under the shield of an obviously-Nazi-inspired screen name, on an anonymous web forum, where, again, everybody already knows how you feel about Jews - is plainly bad faith. Worse, I think it is cowardly.
The Holocaust numbers are not actually important here, because you're not a disinterested observer, and they are not motivating for you. If you became convinced that the six million figure is true exactly as popularly reported, I do not think it would change your feelings on Jews one iota. It's just not the operative thing.
Thus to repeat myself:
Bit of funny lore on that front. Be me:
It is fair to say honestly that most Holocaust deniers, especially the Denier repoasters on Twitter, are antisemites who use Denial as a bludgeon. I think I am rare in that investigating this topic was my own red-pill on broader Jewish Question, so-to-speak, the reason I spent so much time investigating it is because I was resistant to Revisionist conclusions. And then my change in opinion on that topic also led to questioning many other institutional norms, prevailing cultural criticisms, and finding common patterns and I share my thinking here on this forum. The end, true story. My Holocaust Denial came before my (alleged) Antisemtism, I don't think there are many such cases.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link