Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 210
- 2
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
What are your best War podcasts? I'm looking to Monitor the Situation, but all the podcasts I normally listen to are entirely too biased, either engaging in TDS, engaging in performative anti-TDS, or Israel blaming/defending to degrees I find distasteful. I want real conflict examination.
I like war nerd and ACOUP's content but I'm not going to pay for the Patreon to get a podcast, for context. I like the modern war institute podcast, but they don't release enough.
Parts of Hardcore History. Not strictly war or a podcast but always liked Historia Civilis. Again not really a podcast but Shawn Ryan or Jocko Willink. You could also check out IRGC affiliated X accounts. The selfies they take just before launching missiles at Israel are pretty funny. Or check Telegram channels to see Russian’s war footage on the Ukrainian front lines.
I’m not really a war guy.
Ugh. Historia Civilis is so frustrating! He makes great videos, well animated, well narrated, but takes increasingly long breaks between them (now up to 6 months!), and has become increasingly ideological across the lifetime of his channel.
Used to be that he just had a forgivable historian's bias for a few things here and there. (admires Agrippa, dislikes Octavian) Now, he puts out ahistorical propaganda pieces like Work, and his progressive/lib bias overshadows the history in videos like Reform or Revolution? 1830 to 1832.
I honestly found the last part of that video particularly funny, as it's his side (progressive/the current Establishment) that has been standing in the way and blocking elections from being won/any reform from occurring.
I doubt he'd've condemned it if he understood the full implication, but most progressives are invested in not understanding that, which is why they still call themselves "liberals".
More options
Context Copy link
Could be worse, could be Mike Duncan.
The History of Rome guy? I didn't sense any egregious shitlibbery from him when I listened to that podcast.
He claims to have been "radicalized" during the Revolutions podcast researching the Haitian revolution, though I suspect it was a long slow metamorphosis into being a boomerlib (the sections of the Revolutions pod on Indians and slavery in the American Revolution are also extremely cringe). His tweets today are something about how there's no ethical consumption under capitalism but it's particularly unjustifiable to be a Yankees fan, and then as you scroll down it's the worst redditshit you can imagine ("You'll be shocked to learn the guy who popped up to defend Pete Rose's honor and scold me for being insensitive spends his time on twitter harassing transwomen and spewing invective against Muslims").
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I would second Perun (https://youtube.com/@PerunAU). His analyses tend to be quite objective, and he will usually wait at least a week after a major event happens before he covers it, to let the dust settle and get the worst misinformation out of the way. He is also quite transparent regarding where he gets his information from, and is good at mentioning when the it is incomplete or likely to be biased (which is very often the case given the fog of war).
More options
Context Copy link
Historical or current?
More options
Context Copy link
It's dry and mostly concerned with defense economics, but PERUN podcast has had a really excellent hit rate over the years. One of the only ones to have correctly triangulated between "10 days special military operation" and "Ukrainian flag over perfidious muscovy".
You mean the youtube channel? I can't find an audio podcast.
Yup. There was a podcast at some point, but I don't think anyone bothered not just listing to the youtube video with the screen off.
Do you know what are his most accurate and least accurate areas of focus?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link