site banner
PaperclipPerfector  2d ago (text post)   1771 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for June 7, 2026

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Anyone have any theories on the song Mr Bright side by the killers? Specifically why it's been so popular for so long?

I like the song, it's good. I just don't know if I'd label it as one of the greatest songs of the last 50 years, which is what is implied by it's longevity in top song charts.

A major reason for its enduring popularity is that it's a song almost perfectly optimised for karaoke and drunken sing-alongs. The vocal range spans one octave, with most of the melody consisting of alternating between the tonic and the subtonic, which are only a semitone apart. At no point in the song is the singer called upon to do anything remotely complex, melodically or rhythmically. I've often noted the strange fact that the only song people are called upon to publicly sing multiple times a year ("Happy Birthday to You") features an octave jump, which most untrained singers simply can't reliably pull off, especially when singing a capella. By contrast, "Mr. Brightside" is a song that anyone can sing, no matter their level of musical training or state of inebriation. The simplicity of the vocal melody is such that even a literally tone-deaf person could probably make a decent fist of it. Helping the fact that it's so easy to sing is that the lyrics for both verses are identical, so one has significantly fewer lyrics to memorise than one would expect.

And it takes a professional to sing "The Star-Spangled Banner" at all well.

Baffling choice of song for a national anthem. The entire point of them is that they're meant to be sung by masses of people, many of whom have no musical training.

Its military content and somewhat bombastic tune made it popular among military and marching bands, cementing it as the unofficial anthem long before Congress made it official in the 30's.

I'm sure it slaps when performed by a marching band made up of talented musicians. But as a national anthem, a song meant to be sung by masses of people, most of whom aren't professional musicians? Very peculiar choice.

People do successfully sing it literally all the time though. Every sporting event in the country opens with the Star Spangled Banner, and it's almost always great. Americans sing our national anthem more than any other nationality on the planet. And for everyone except the microphoned soloist, it doesn't really matter if they hit every note perfectly. That's the beauty of large choruses--everyone's tone-deafness sort of washes out and it aounds great no matter what. I have never once been disappointed by the crowd singing the national anthem at a baseball game.

The Star Spangled Banner fucking slaps, and I'm tired of pretending it doesn't.

I'm not even criticising it from a compositional standpoint, I just think the level of technical skill it requires is beyond the reach of most untrained singers. I'm not even American but I've seen more than my fair share of "fail" videos where solo singers hit bum notes or have audible voice cracks when they get up into the higher register ("land of the free"). When sung by a singer who knows what they're doing it's a suitably stirring piece of music.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats