site banner
PaperclipPerfector  3d ago (text post)   13026 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of June 15, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You couldn't have crafted a more disgusting stereotype if you tried.

The reason why Austin replied was because Einhorn tried to get him to work on Sunday. A jew sabbath checking an intern, who sniffed him out and said no thanks.

Then they proceed to cry out in pain as they strike him.

A jew sabbath checking an intern

WTF is “Sabbath checking”? What are you talking about?

First time I've seen the term, but I think it's pretty clear if you know the context.

Specifically, that the three Abrahamic religions have different days of the week as the Sabbath. Jews consider Saturday the Sabbath. Christians consider Sunday the Sabbath. Muslims consider Friday the Sabbath.

Hence, asking him to work on Sunday implicitly (if imprecisely) tests whether he's a practicing Christian, because Christians are not supposed to work on Sundays.

Christians consider Sunday the Sabbath.

I can't speak for the Muslims, but the Christian view of this is, uh, complicated. IIRC Catholic doctrine still acknowledges Saturday as the official Sabbath, but because of the entire resurrection thing considers that obligation fulfilled, but Sunday to only functionally replace it.

Other Christian doctrines may vary too.

The tension is obvious enough that the Seventh Day Adventists exist as a denomination to assert that worship on Sunday is a corruption of Catholicism. In addition to their millenarianism, of course. It turns out when you accuse the entirety of Christianity of violating one of the commandments, you tend to have a pretty pessimistic view of the world.

On paper that makes sense but I've never encountered any Christian who refuses to work on Sunday (I'm sure they exist but...), meanwhile many to most of the jews I know refuse to work on the Sabbath sometimes in comical ways, and Islam does the Islam thing.

Chick-fil-A, a national chicken fast food chain, never opens on Sunday. I think the reasons are religious.

Workers often have no control over their schedules, so it's usually up to the business owner to decide the work Sabbath schedule, if any.

A reverse situation is, of course, famously Chick-fil-a. The US obviously had blue laws in many places at one point, and shopping, working, and of course drinking on the Sabbath was once a matter of social opprobrium in the Bible Belt. That Christians generally don’t do this any more is one of the signs of the decline of strict religious practice among Christians.

In medicine I’m sure scheduling like that would override religious objection even for Christian Sabbatarians, especially since, famously, Jesus directly endorsed healing on the Sabbath. Theology in general considers medical care one of the things that permits Sunday working, like rescuing your ass from the ditch (as the good book saith).

Christian Sabbatarianism, especially outside of magisterial Protestantism, has always been more flexible than Jewish Sabbatarianism, and this is an approach of Nazarean vintage.

Yes you and someone else pointed out Chick-fil-a and now that you did ....no duh.

I've never had an exposure to individuals who think this way and I don't have a good handle on if they are anything more than a rounding error now. It's def part of Chick's brand at this point.

proceed to cry out in pain

The most compelling victim narrative usually wins in the court of public opinion.

It's a Goebbels quote.

Like I keep telling people when they ask why I'm reading Tolstoy, the classics are classics for a reason.

Ah, didn't know.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats