This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The SSPX resistance already exists(and has six consecrations, not just two- despite existing for about a third as long and serving far fewer people), and is somehow on worse terms with the SSPX than either is with the Vatican. They may be insane and often criminally inclined, but they do exist and are not particularly trending left(they're busily purity spiraling into sedevacantism).
The SSPX will eventually get their excommunications lifted, probably without actually changing anything. They have a surprising amount of sympathy despite nearly universal condemnation of their recent stunt.
I think that happened more with the earlier breakaways*. The SSPX does seem to have had enough internal discipline not to go down that path yet, and I do think it was because of their willingness - however heel-dragging - to remain in communication with Rome. What happens now, with this decision, where the choice is starkly "pick SSPX or Rome, you can't have both", I won't attempt to forecast.
*Sinead O'Connor got 'ordained' as a 'priest' (her name in religion being Mother Bernadette Mary, this was after she was Rastafarian but before she converted to Islam) by one Bishop (soi-disant) Michael Cox, founder (naturally) of his own church, the Irish Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church. His lineage is that he was ordained by bishops of the Palmarian schism, who in turn had been consecrated by a Vietnamese bishop (whose own consecration was valid and licit). Cox was later consecrated as a bishop by these guys and went on his merry way of ordaining and consecrating his own picks.
Will the SSPX eventually fission off into the likes of these? The Palmarians, for one, are a sadder, smaller version of the Anglicans who like to cosplay: "look, we have the cope! we have the morse! we are too a Third Branch!"
Heh.
More options
Context Copy link
The Palmarians are more of an enclosed cult that pretended to be tradcath long enough to convince a senile bishop who was unaware that Vatican II happened to ordain them bishops than a serious organization. Yes they're attention grabbing but they're also the brainchild of a schizophrenic gay Nazi and I wouldn't read too much into them as a reflection of... anything except themselves. Thuc consecrated a lot of people, at Palmar de Troya and the seminary professors in Mexico(who founded sedevacantism) are the only two anyone pays attention to; but he was a wandering dementia patient who happened to be a war refugee archbishop. Predictably, the Palmarians have seen lots of exodus to do various inane things, including one of their antipopes.
More options
Context Copy link
This makes no sense in the current year, from a recruitment standpoint, if nothing else. Leaving the official structures of the Church in order to bless gay marriages means you will now be competing with 7 zillion protestant sects that have been doing it for decades (not to mention, increasingly, the mainstream Catholic Church itself). The only growth option is appealing to the trads.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
SSPX Resistance, SSPX 2, SSPX Classic, SSPV, SSPX Cash, SSPX One, SSPX-MC…
No points for guessing which ones are fake.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link