site banner
PaperclipPerfector  3d ago (text post)   2066 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for August 9, 2026

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

1
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you all think there is a niche for independent writing these days? Could a Scott-like or similar figure rise out of the ashes of the blogosphere and have success, say, on Substack? As far as I can tell, the platform has been quite effective in attracting a small horde of Gen-Z amateur anthropologists, mainly of the ironic post-feminist variety, though many of them have pre-existing credentials that boosted their writing from the get-go. How do you view the current landscape for aspiring authors?

If you can write as good as Sam Kriss, you will enjoy the same success as Sam Kriss. Algorithms make recognition of ability easy, efficient, and reliable. No more languishing in obscurity. The problem is that algorithms also select for cheap, shallow thrills in addition to hardcore skill and talent, so most aspiring writers take the easy route of producing trash for the masses (see KulakRevolt and Scott Alexander) rather than more significant aesthetic works.

Overall, the market for writing may have shrunk as well, as the attention economy has gotten hyper saturated. It may follow the general trend we're seeing of entry and midlevel opportunities drying up as things become more concentrated at the highest levels. That's probably also the work of efficient markets.

What’s a good Sam Kriss passage / article?

The law that can be named is not the true law and the follow-up Against Truth give you a good feel for his style, strengths, and weaknesses (no, it is not actually good to be against truth). I'm partial to Douglas Murray, gruesome toady and The world’s first matcha labubu genocide, which is unfortunately behind a partial paywall.

https://samkriss.substack.com/p/numb-at-burning-man

https://samkriss.substack.com/p/in-my-zombie-era

This one's pretty good: https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-century-of-the-maxxer

Mm, this really isn't true. If you write like Sam Kriss into the void, you'll enjoy approximately zero organic success. You need to both write like Sam, and market like him, to enjoy success like him. There are platforms that will drive viewership organically to your writing. Most of them are places to read fiction for free. If you want to write blogs, you're gonna need to market yourself.

If you write to his level on Substack, the algorithm's going to pick you up and you're going to get a ton of subscribers and even enough paid subscribers to make a decent income. I'd also count his ability to market himself and manage how he comes across as a personality as part of his writer's skillset, especially in how it directly informs the content of his writing. But there's much less necessary hustle than you make it seem. Putting quality stuff on Substack is alone sufficient to gain some measure of success.

@Turniper @RedRegard What do you think is necessary for a writer trying to market themselves? I'm not terribly familiar with Sam Kriss' public image - how does he position his work?

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats