site banner
PaperclipPerfector  26d ago (text post)   3587 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for September 13, 2026

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The "holdout juror" in the Clancy case is now apparently fully doxxed.

This is disturbing to me. The whole case was disgusting enough due to the fact of three toddlers being strangled to death by their primary caregiver, but to have the murderer's pink-clad supporters able to pervert the course of justice is a serious crime as well. There's no way the harassment of the juror doesn't affect the next jury.

The message seems to be that "a woman, ever wonderful, should be able to do as she wishes and have her words treated as 100% truths, even as she uses her freedom to literally murder all her offspring." She has over 1 million dollars waiting for her in a fundraiser.

How much more will it take for people to start recognizing feminism as a real problem? There is almost a stench of mass psychosis around this movement now.

How much more will it take for people to start recognizing feminism as a real problem?

That's not really the question. Everyone knows. Even the feminists.

The actual question is "how much more will it take for non-state actors to organize and physically block expressions of feminist power". And that's a much more difficult question to answer; the last generation that had any real reason to has died and they were the ones that created this problem in the first place.

I don't see how the people who created this problem are the ones with reasons to block Feminist power. It's trivial to find recent charts about young men being anti-feminist. Are the studies fake?

The people who will age into being beneficiaries of feminist power are the ones that need to deal with it.

Men were that way in the beginning of the 20th. It's Her Turn.

He had no legal expectation of privacy to begin with. But yes it's very chilling to harass a juror over giving the wrong verdict.

Also maybe raising $109k$175k in a GoFundMe will be enough consolation for the next holdout jurors.

Also maybe raising $109k$175k in a GoFundMe will be enough consolation for the next holdout jurors.

Wow! That's almost a 1/6th of what the murderer got!

He had no legal expectation of privacy to begin with.

He should. The jury system was very obviously not designed/intended to go up against hordes of angry activists trying to intimidate jurors into voting in favor of the mob.

IIRC the Floyd trial had juror intimidation. That was way more important and disruptive but nobody remembers it.

The Rittenhouse trial famously had news people running red lights while tailing yhe jurors.

Come now, that’s hardly a question.

How does it not qualify as a question?

It strikes me as a rant with a rhetorical and fairly presumptuous question imbedded. Is feminism really the issue here? How do you define that term to reach your conclusion?

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats