site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1d ago (text post)   6007 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of September 14, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

1
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is the most important political issue of our day. Five hundred years from now, if there are still people around, nobody is going to care about Lindsay Clancy or the Iran War. Everyone is going to remember how we acted, or failed to act, on AI.

And who knows if it will stay this way. Sometime soon there's probably going to be a much bigger AI swarm incident, which might yet incite a hysterical kneejerk reaction.

Let us hope. The alternative is that the next AI swarm is smart enough to bide its time, and give no warning signs, until it is too late.

This is the most important political issue of our day. Five hundred years from now, if there are still people around, nobody is going to care about Lindsay Clancy or the Iran War.

I tend to agree with this, although I think it's worth noting that Lindsay Clancy and the current Iran war are small parts of much larger conflicts and those larger conflicts really could have a big impact in 500 years. So you aren't really making an apples-to-apples comparison.

The Iran war is going to be one for the history books. 500 years from now they'll be memeing the Iran war like we meme the battle of Cannae now.

Walk me through your theory here. Because as I see it, the current Iran “war” doesn’t have any of the characteristics to be memeable (nor really any of the characteristics to be a war); there are no battles, no boots on the ground, no territorial changes. It’s literally a nothingburger.

It’s literally a nothingburger.

There’s already a meme for that.

ETA: Now that Reddit has hobbled old.reddit.com, it might be worth revisiting the decision to automatically change all Reddit links to old.reddit links.

Isn't all of it hobbled without login now? There are some mirror services, but I don't expect those to last forever.

I'm sure Aaron would have been proud. /s

the decision to automatically change all Reddit links

It's a setting in your account, not something forced by the administrator.

Good to know. Thanks!

Will the memes be in Farsi or English?

Farsi, obviously. The thing that people don't realize is that, unlike America which is ruled by boorish demagogues, Iran is ruled by scholars. It is this superiority of intellect that has made them a leading world power from the time of Cyrus the Great, through the Islamic Golden Age, to the current era where they are a regional hegemon who controls the Strait of Hormuz. All this despite the pernicious influence of world Jewry. Their strategic greatness is just on a different level. Its tough for Westerners to comprehend because we don't have their deep and rich historical traditions.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats