Why is this game so popular? I played Wrath of the Righteous which seems much more complicated and interesting. Lvl cap at 20 so more content and customization, at least twice as many classes plus a bunch of mythic classes, plus Pathfinder has more choices per level anyway. You can switch between real-time and turn-based at will. There are difficulty settings so it can be as hard or easy as you like. Does Baldur's Gate not have difficulty settings - how can it be a 'hard' game?
Pathfinder has its flaws - 3/4 female romanceables have eaten human flesh. The ending slides were pretty bad. I suppose the graphics aren't too great, there aren't really close-up cinematics. Sex is all cut too black. But why would I play Baldur's Gate when I can play WOTR instead?
The limited scope makes the gameplay less tedious and allows them to put in more random fun.
For instance the implemented the talk with animals spell with full voice acting. So you can chat with a cow and then catch up with her when she’s been moved to a new area. They also put in this bit with a cat the seems to have no plot relevance.
Of all the things I want to see in a game, badly rendered characters emulating human porn is not one of them. If that floats your boat, why not go onto PornHub instead and get the real thing (for a certain value of 'real')? Okay so Milly Mysteria the Witch and Oakheart Ironthew the Barbarian are getting it on, and you've tweaked the settings to give Milly zeppelin boobs and Oakheart a prodigioius endowment, but... how is it enjoyable to watch the stuttering framerate of two sprites banging against each other?
I tried to play Kingmaker. The gameplay seemed to offer nothing new over older CRPGs and the writing appeared extremely derivative. I quit shortly after the prologue, being unable to justify spending time on it, and thus War of the Righteous isn't even on the table for me.
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Why is this game so popular? I played Wrath of the Righteous which seems much more complicated and interesting. Lvl cap at 20 so more content and customization, at least twice as many classes plus a bunch of mythic classes, plus Pathfinder has more choices per level anyway. You can switch between real-time and turn-based at will. There are difficulty settings so it can be as hard or easy as you like. Does Baldur's Gate not have difficulty settings - how can it be a 'hard' game?
Pathfinder has its flaws - 3/4 female romanceables have eaten human flesh. The ending slides were pretty bad. I suppose the graphics aren't too great, there aren't really close-up cinematics. Sex is all cut too black. But why would I play Baldur's Gate when I can play WOTR instead?
The limited scope makes the gameplay less tedious and allows them to put in more random fun.
For instance the implemented the talk with animals spell with full voice acting. So you can chat with a cow and then catch up with her when she’s been moved to a new area. They also put in this bit with a cat the seems to have no plot relevance.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=XXpDsROtiT8
Gameplay wise the choices hit the right balance between mindless levelling and having to read every skill description and overthink things.
More options
Context Copy link
...
More options
Context Copy link
Of all the things I want to see in a game, badly rendered characters emulating human porn is not one of them. If that floats your boat, why not go onto PornHub instead and get the real thing (for a certain value of 'real')? Okay so Milly Mysteria the Witch and Oakheart Ironthew the Barbarian are getting it on, and you've tweaked the settings to give Milly zeppelin boobs and Oakheart a prodigioius endowment, but... how is it enjoyable to watch the stuttering framerate of two sprites banging against each other?
But as ever, for every one, it's YMMV.
Yeah personally I favour cut-to-black as well. But apparently BG3's 'you can have sex with a bear' was popular, or at least attention-grabbing.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I tried to play Kingmaker. The gameplay seemed to offer nothing new over older CRPGs and the writing appeared extremely derivative. I quit shortly after the prologue, being unable to justify spending time on it, and thus War of the Righteous isn't even on the table for me.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link