site banner
PaperclipPerfector  6mo ago (text post)   2883 thread views

Friday Fun Thread for October 27, 2023

Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.

4
Bottom New Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just pay?

If that wasn't a worse experience than using an adblock or sponsor block..

How is it worse?

Bruh. You're welcome to try it and see for yourself.

YT without additional client-side mods is nagware filth full of Tiktok shit in the form of shorts, endless sponsor sections per video, awful community posts because what a video platform needs to be is social media too, and no end of miscellaneous garbage.

I have and I have not really experienced what you describe or don't care.

Maybe this is an app/browser thing? I almost only ever used the app for the past 8 years so I've not bothered to optimise the web client, perhaps there is a large difference there?

The one thing you mention that I have seen is the shorts. But that is one recommendation second from the top of the feed which I just scroll past and I'm not bothered by again, and occasionally the shorts are of interest to me.

It's possible we have very different tolerances, or what I consider severe annoyances aren't so for you.

The YT app by default is clogged with bullshit that gets in the way of my primary use case, which is to see videos from people I'm subscribed to, as well as occasional fresh recommendations. When I open it right now, even using a patched app, the entire front page is taken up by crap I'm not interested in, like live streams, shorts, or playlists.

Further, my modified client has a ton of QOL feature that YT either never had or has deprecated, like forcing video resolution and so on.

Strange. Some of that I have literally never seen promoted, like live streams.

The one gripe i do agree with is the promoted playlists (mixes), that is completely useless to me and I would like to disable the feature. It's not a major issue, it takes a millisecond to scroll past but it is a completely unnecessary annoyance and I dont see why they wouldn't allow you to disable this.

Furthermore, I might have agreed with you more a few years ago (4+ maybe), when the recommendation algorithm was pure garbage, but as it is now I rely more on the algorithm than subscriptions anyway. First off, the rexommendqtions are pretty good and include plenty of things I wouldn't have found ok my own and it also solves the issue of creators that make different kinds of content on same channel, only some of which I'm interested in, which used to be a frequent problem for me.

I'm quite happy with the recommendations myself, I guess we simply have different thresholds for annoyance.

I still suggest you try a modded client yourself, if you're feeling conscientious you could still pay for Premium and use it too, I think you'd find that acceptable right?

Sure, if I ever get the energy to set one up. I don't really care about improving the user experience right now, it doesn't really bother me. If they introduce something that does though I might check it out.

This is what I've been doing for years, starting back when Google Music became a thing, because subscription to that also came with a subscription to YouTube Red (a terrible name for their premium service, given the existence of RedTube - though still preferable to calling it YouTube One like every single brand in existence has been doing the last decade). Once Google Music got shuttered I just kept the YouTube Red subscription at the same price.

Of course, this makes me the sucker who got baited into a service I didn't initially want and stuck with it just out of laziness and inertia. I rationalize it that $10/mo is worth it for the hours I must save not watching ads on YT, to say nothing of the disruption and annoyance, but that rationalization is going to be harder for others depending on their circumstances, I admit.

Paying a small fee for a service you use a lot doesn't sound like being a sucker.

It can be when you're accustomed to not paying, and you see plenty of others not paying. If free riding is an option, why not take it? In this case, it's partly the extra convenience and the little warm and fuzzy feeling I get from doing things above board, but, again, that seems just like rationalizations that I'm telling myself so I don't feel too much like a sucker.

In this case, it's partly the extra convenience and the little warm and fuzzy feeling I get from doing things above board, but, again, that seems just like rationalizations that I'm telling myself so I don't feel too much like a sucker.

It's rationalisations all the way down!

Seriously though, what do you use for music now, you don't use YouTube music? It sucks so much, but I haven't found another music streaming service that will let me upload several thousand tracks to it (and I assume youtube wouldn't let me these days either.)

I decided to just embrace streaming and use YT music now. It's good enough for my needs, since I'm not the type of person to listen to music much, and the few times I feel like putting something on, just a YT recommended playlist does the job well enough. I've also actually come around to not hating discoverability - i.e. YT recommending music to me that I hadn't listened to before.

Am I a sucker for not stealing from my local grocery store or not paying for PT? I'm sure I could get away with both with little to no negative consequences.

You wouldn't steal a car.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ALZZx1xmAzg?si=KHIsWoGo3JgSvR5Q

Ignoring the discussion about IP, you're not copying here. You're literally stealing.

Ad blocking on a streaming site seems less like stealing to me than what the "you wouldn't steal a car" campaign was targeting. In the streaming ad-block case, you're just finding clever ways around certain aspects of the APIs/functionality that they're already putting forth. In the downloading movie case, those movies were never supposed to be put up for distribution on the pirating sites to begin with.

Just like I find a clever way past not paying for my dinner at the restaurant by going to the bathroom and climbing out the window.

More comments

Yeah the number of people who just expect to never pay for anything and think it's some kind of moral statement on their part... Fundamentally unserious. Pay, watch ads, don't use their product. Three very easy choices.

There's no way I'm incentivizing them to do this. I'm very stingy, I barely pay for any services.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats