BANNED USER: Constant low-value, low-effort antagonistic poster
Job
No bio...
User ID: 1485
Banned by: @Amadan
I think you have the Ukrainian man's perspective wrong.
I probably do.
Russia launched this invasion in the first place because they (or, rather, the idea/memeplex of Russia) have lost the culture war in Ukraine.
Maybe they did, but that should not translate into bombing civilians with strong ties to your much bigger and stronger next door neighbor.
Wars still need to be fought. It's very impressive that the comedy actor Zelensky was able to parlay billions of dollars from the EU and US, but all it takes is for the general sentiment to turn in either or both for 'his' country to go down the drain.
Furthermore, if the average Ukrainian man is a strong nationalist willing to die for Ukraine (whatever that is), that he considered very very different than the next door Russian neighbor his ancestors shared hundreds of years of destiny with, he's in for a big surprise when he finds out what kind of people the EU and NATO have been importing on their side.
Nationalism is not really a strong value for the NATO camp, and aside from the Reddit brigade, there aren't that many people that care enough about the personal, individual fate of any Ukrainian to put their life on the line for them.
Any other year, they would have assumed the man to be some kind of patriarchal racist/xenophobe, and to an extent probably correctly.
Job
1yr ago
I don't have any issue with non-family men or women interacting with my children in an appropriate context.
You can smile at them,talk to them, pat them on the head, as long as you're a normal person.
Warning signs: visible tattoos or piercings, danger hair color (aposematism) or hair cuts, obesity, strange dress, unkempt appearance, odd behavior, conspicuous lack of children at an older age...
If you insist on talking about sexuality with children, don't be surprised if people call you a groomer. Children do not need to know that <1% of the population likes certain practices that do not contribute to making children.
If you wear the same clothes around children as you did at your last orgy, don't be surprised if wary parents give you dirty looks.
It's really not rocket science.
So, what is your objection to them not "assimilating" - which I take you to mean, converting to Christianity or otherwise abandoning Judaism - now?
I thought I laid it out pretty clearly:
The difference between the Amish and the Jews is that the Amish don't control banking and media corporations, don't control people's livelihood, what they buy, are allowed to buy or what they are allowed to think, who they are allowed to vote for.
My problem is when a tiny minority that hates me has such control over my life.
It also happens when people talk trash about blacks or women or trans or any other favored minority group. We talk a lot here about how it's pretty much only "privileged" groups (i.e., straight white men) who it's okay for celebrities and politicians to talk trash about.
Name 5 examples of a rich African-American suffering from talking trash about anyone else but the Jews.
There's clearly a hierarchy of who it is okay to criticize.
what you think "we" should do about it, or alternatively, what you think Jews should do to stop being so offensively Jewish, you are conspicuously silent.
I'm not against powerful Jews. My issue is that they are against me.
I want to have a country where if there are elections they are not controlled by 8 media conglomerates that are either outright owned by Jews or overtly Jew-friendly.
I want to have an internet where I can write or read opinions about powerful Jews or anyone else without having to go through convoluted hoops. See what happened to the Dailystormer, and others.
I want to limit the amount of crime that powerful people commit, and if they do commit them, be able to point it out without harmful consequences.
I want scientists to be able to study trends that are related to crimes powerful people commit, for example Epstein, Weinstein, Wexner for sexual crimes, or Sam Bankman Fried and Charlie Javice for fraud.
If we see some actionable information there, then we can figure out what to do.
I would also like media to stop printing propaganda encouraging my children to do drugs, mutilate themselves, hate their ancestors, hate their religion, etc,
but if not, at least having an alternative would be nice.
Oh and another ask would be to stop having my taxes pay for wars on behalf of powerful Jews and their friends. Which was the biggest commitment Trump made to the American people, and for what he ultimately had to be removed imo.
Job
1yr ago
I catch a lot of flak for saying this from older/married users here but the modern Instagram/Snapchat/Tinder-injected dating scene is really something they are NOT used to.
So I am getting up on podium and saying; So what if you fix the economy, so what if you fix culture? What are you going to do about the fact that OLD made it such that instead of settling with the guy from college or the office, a good chunk of women think they deserve to marry and build a life with the 99th percentile men they get attention from on tinder (men will fuck anything within reason).
Have you considered going around with a hammer smashing (young) w*men's cell phones?
Job
1yr ago
Retroviruses like HIV are able to insert their genomes into the human genome because they're built to do so.
Yes, so what you are saying is that there are a bunch of HIV+ people walking around with reverse transcriptases in some of their cells.
What do reverse transcriptases do? They transcribe RNA into DNA.
They don't care if it's HIV or covid.
It is not built to integrate into the host genome.
If I was masterminding a big conspiracy to sterilize a big part of humanity, this is the part I would be lying about.
Not saying that this is true or not, I'm just saying one possibility is that it is actually packaged in there and nobody has the capacity or will to check.
Heck, they could have been injecting us with reverse transcriptase in a separate instance (food, drinks, other injections), but that's a little bit too convoluted.
The splicing might randomly impact the cell via accidentally inserting itself into a coding sequence, or an intron, or a promoter sequence, or it might integrate into a region of noncoding RNA where it might affect some of the local molecular architecture.
That's the fun experiment part.
Do this to billions of people and a few hundred thousands of them will have a few cells where the spike protein sequence just happens to insert itself in the right area to get translated into a functional protein. And some other hundred thousands will have sequences that do not generate a functional protein, but instead generate something like a prion protein, or turns the cell into a cancerous cell, which would be much worse. And some other thousands or millions will have some other kind of integration that just kills the cell instead and stops the issue...
It would be a really, really stupid way of trying to genetically engineer a population, because it actively wouldn't work on so many different levels.
Well maybe this was all a big test and it failed. Maybe they genuinely tried to engineer something functional to save humanity and they just screwed up big time and then they just kept doubling down on, covering their traces because of the stakes, the outrage, the money, and business as usual with Big Pharma and the people that are loyal to it.
Job
1yr ago
Poland is on pace to have higher per capita income than England.
I wonder if this has to do with the quality of people that reside respectively in Poland and England.
I wonder if building stronger ties to NATO and EU is going to lead Poland toward increasing or decreasing the quality of the people that live there.
Let's not forget the assumption that higher per capita income should be used as an important metrics.
But your opinion is quickly given - you don’t believe Ukranians exists.
What do you care if Ukrainians exist? If the proportion of Ukrainian in Ukraine decreased by 10% but the per capita income increased by 10%, wouldn't that be positive for you?
This is horrible logic - “Ukraine had the chance to create their own identified when they had Russian leaders”
Ukraine had an identity for the hundreds of years that it was practically a part of Russia.
You do not seem to like that identity and you seem to believe that the 1991 to 2022 or 2014 to 2022 period is the 'real' Ukrainian identity. Arbitrary.
You saying Ukraine could have any destiny they wanted as long as their a Russian colony.
Oh now they are finally free from the Russian empire! They only have to come grovel to the American congress and take orders from American politicians. Surely this will improve their lot.
The EU makes it difficult to be conservative, due to their rules superseding national rules.
They can literally force unpopular changes on the locals due to their grandparents' government choosing to join the EU.
Additionally, whether the changes are intended or not, exposure to a broader market means that other countries gain access to your own market, and the EU by design prevents fine-tuning of internal market mechanisms to for example protect the local labor from foreign truckers, factory workers, farmers etc.
It's not an on-off button you can play with to get wealth out of. Once you're in your people's destiny is tied in to the EU's peoples' destinies.
For a small country like Poland the choice is to align with a block like EU or Russia or China or US or say a hypothetical confederation of Eastern Europeans countries... Either way, the choice matters for your people's future, and the Poles picked the atheist, gay pride block.
That's one way of looking at it.
The 'lack of gratitude' is not the issue in this case.
One could argue that Jews are not necessary to elevate the talented African-Americans. Even Hitler recognized the talent of Jesse Owens for example.
American entertainment Jewish millionaires and billionaires are not exactly acting out of pure disinterested concern for their brothers.
The issue is that African-Americans who are not grateful for billions (trillions?) of dollars of welfare and other perks associated with living in a Western country, can freely criticize white Americans, even colonize or burn down their city centers, and not much happens to them.
Yet for some mild criticism of Jewish billionaires, they get fired, unbanked, etc.
And everybody has to say 'Jews don't have power' or a similar fate awaits them.
Job
1yr ago
Hasn't Ireland benefited massively from having lower tax rates than most other EU countries and acting as some kind of tax haven?
Their 2018 law allowing abortion shows which kind of path they're engaged in after welcoming Google and Facebook headquarters in Dublin.
the majority of Ukrainians won't be sitting around grumbling about Black people.
Job
1yr ago
How about fleeing to another [more affluent] country, taking the necessary steps to have your descendants take control of that country and then exact revenge on the initial threat?
Would that be a successful strategy?
Job
1yr ago
Which country?
The only consistent alternative to NIMBYism is Kyle-Rittenhouseism -or Goetzism for the older version- in America.
You've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?'
You can't simultaneously assert the right of one urban demographic to burn down, tear apart, annihilate downtown and then turn around and complain about food deserts, sprawl, bulletproof windows, shrink prevention devices...
Getting pushed onto subway tracks is 'part and parcel of living in a big city', yet it's not everybody's cup of tea.
Job
1yr ago
Ok that makes a lot of sense.
Yet it would be apropos, considering that they are both seemingly nationalist countries in the same area with common interests, and facing an existential risk at this point.
It's even somewhat ironic that they would go to such great length for the integrity of Ukraine's borders, when Ukrainian nationalists themselves would love to claim a slice of Poland.
Who would say no to a slice of Poland?
Job
1yr ago
Did Poland really need money so badly that it had to join the EU?', and any responses to it, are trivially incoherent unless you assume that the EU is an inherently malignant entity.
Well I was always perplexed by Poland joining the EU because they are consistently among the black sheep with Hungary who oppose a lot of what the EU members collectively stand for.
I'm legitimately asking what was the original idea behind Poland joining the EU which implicitly and formally comes with a certain set of requirements, among which giving up some of your sovereignty, when in the 2000s Poland has been rejecting a lot of these requirements
So, rephrasing, did Poland really need money that badly that they had to join the EU, despite knowing that they would down the line not want to fulfill some of the requirements, like not going against EU rules created by countries that are much more pro-immigration and anti-Christian-family than them?
Job
1yr ago
How could a transwoman age better than a woman?
Isn't the aspiration to be a woman?
If you don't look like a woman in your elder years, aren't you failing your stated goal?
Job
1yr ago
The key difference between Blue Jews and Blue whites is that if somebody goes and says 'I have an issue with Jews' then the Blue Jews can all get together and issue a statement to complain and bad stuff can happen to that somebody.
If somebody goes and says 'I have an issue with white people' then they can potentially profit from it and the Blue whites might have to apologize for whatever complaint was filed against them.
Oh and they also get their Blue white comrades to fund the military defense of their ethnostate in the Middle-East that they can retreat to if their latest race war experiment goes wrong stateside.
Integrating to the Blue team for white people means letting go of your tribal connections, denying the importance of your ancestry, cultural accomplishments, demanding that whatever remains of it be thrown down.
An authentic Blue Jew would demand Holocaust museums exclusively host Rwandan or Uyghur genocide exhibits, write hit-pieces endlessly tearing down classic Holocaust literature like Ann Frank's diary, Maus, etc, for racism, homophobia, sexism...
We need a Netflix Ann Frank movie starring a disabled trans African tribeswoman including jokes targeted at traditional Jewish culture.
Job
1yr ago
Freedom is important.
One of the most important freedoms that the USA trample on is freedom of association.
If I were allowed to keep my family away from the kind of people that desire the freedom to do cocaine and other mind-altering substances, then it would not be that bad if these substances were technically 'legal'.
If I had a choice, when sending my kids to school, to pick the teacher they get trained by, why should I care that it's legal to hire gay pedophiles?
Job
1yr ago
Nobody ever tries to put these fat people in work camps.
If WW2 history classes have taught anyone anything, it's that dieting works.
Job
1yr ago
Why are you unable to understand why people might want to run from an empire that has, is, and signals a clear intent to continue brutalizing a people, to an association that does not?
It would have remained a mostly peaceful special operation if the US and EU had not meddled like they did in so many other countries in the last few decades.
Clearly not, or else migrants would be going to the wealth in Africa, which is the highest it's ever been in human history, and not to wealthier countries elsewhere. This distinction in grades of wealth is itself held within the European Union, where Ukraine would not be the wealthiest, and thus not in the area where migration flows would be intending to go.
Yet the EU intended to distribute them to Hungary and Poland.
Plus at some point being overrun by migrants will have an impact on the Western economies.
The migrants are not leaving Africa to settle in a colder Africa.
and have identified a European model that does not entail having to take in refugees, you have just resolved your own objection.
There is not.
Hungary is getting punished for its immigration policies, by getting cut off from EU gibs.
Similarly, Poland will get punished, or its American and EU 'allies' will see that they elect a government worthy of investing so much NATO money in, ie a government that celebrates gays and Africans.
And if people like Sgt. Makhno are in charge of future Ukraine, it seems that they will welcome everyone.
Ukraine will be very gay and very African or it will not be.
I don't 100% support Russia in all cases. There are many things I don't understand about Russia, and a lot of the propaganda does not resonate with me.
My main issue with this whole situation is that Ukraine is making a claim to power 'We should independently be able to control our own destiny'.
Fair and good, go and fight Russia.
But that claim is not the only claim, the following one is 'So now give us money'
Clearly Ukraine does not have the material means to follow up on its ambitions.
From what I gathered so far, most commenters here support Ukraine, but they do not mostly support Ukraine because they believe that Ukraine should be independent, to my understanding.
Some like @Dean seem to support beating down Russia out of attachment to principles like 'nuclear non-proliferation' and 'preventing annexations'. Fair enough, but that's not making a moral claim, you're supporting the ethical system enforced by the top guy that you so far have been lucky to be on the good side of.
Once Ukraine has successfully 'beat down Russia', will they be independent?
Will the 'reconstruction money' come with no strings attached?
No requirements to Westernify, Americanize, Netflix your society like the Marshall plan, the EU subsidies, the occupation of Japan and West Germany?
I doubt it.
In my opinion, from the demographic, cultural, nationalist point of view, siding with the West is a sure way to end the Ukrainian nation within the next century.
Hence the absurdity of this supposedly 'nationalist' drive.
My intuition tells me that Zelensky is to Ukrainian nationalism what Sam Bankman-Fried is to ethical altruism.
Job
1yr ago
Maybe if they didn't make NATO the only way to avoid getting invaded and instead offered a better deal they wouldn't be in this mess.
NATO doesn't protect anyone from invasion, quite the opposite actually.
Without NATO wars in North Africa and the Middle-East, there would have been a lot fewer immigrants to Western Europe in the past decade, that many have characterized as 'invaders'.
But Gaddafi got his, so there's that.
Gaddafi got what? His fair trial according to the rule-based liberal world order?
Job
1yr ago
All I'm saying is that they are a lot of Americans that believe that the militarization of American police is a bad thing.
Joe Biden for example:
"Surplus military equipment for law enforcement? They don't need that," Biden continued. "The last thing you need is an up-armored Humvee coming into the neighborhood, it is like the military invading, they don't know anybody, they become the enemy. They're supposed to be protecting these people."
According to many people, the proliferation of America's military power is directly harming them.
Another aspect is the mental health crisis for veterans, who make up a significant share of the homeless on American streets.
Russia practiced total war same as everyone else. You really think they wouldn't have used nukes if they had them?
They've had them and not used them. Their track record is much better than America's.
Job
1yr ago
Insofar as the reasonable man's reaction to a co-ordinated effort to sexually abuse children is not "I should vote about this and if I get outvoted, I should allow my children to be sexually abused", the actions of the shooter are completely predictable
Andrew Anglin (AA) at the Dailystormer agrees with you.
You aren't reponsible for every nutcase or moron on your team. But you are responsible for the logical consequence of your ideas.
Why is the onus on the people upset about child sex abuse to watch their speech and not those who condone the CSA?
AA makes the point that the club where that shooting happened:
- can reasonably be inferred to host sex parties because that is what MSM do in their clubs
-was advertising a drag story hour for children in the same premises
Obviously that kind of coincidence is upsetting for a certain segment of the population.
The logical consequence of the widespread conflation of 1 the 'gay lifestyle' ie orgies with strangers in semi-public locations (see pride) and 2
outreach with children leads to a natural association :
'these perverts are really keen to 'educate' [my] children into their so-called lifestyle, and I don't see this as an optimal situation as I do not want [my] children to grow up with trauma, sexual infections, unnatural behaviors etc'
Aside from ramping up the police state, what is the MSM community's solution to marginal non-MSM anger?
The Dailystormer is ran by a handful of people, has covered many topics in depth that other media don't cover, for example what happened in Charlottesville, on January 6th, the adventures of Hunter Biden, geopolitical issues including non-American sources (Western media hardly ever present the Chinese or Russian POV).
They have a clearly expressed bias, they offer retractions / apologies when they get something wrong, they hold people on their side accountable...
There are a lot of topics that they don't cover and their coverage is usually surface-level, but their journalistic track record is much better than any big media I can think of.
I'm sure that they are other good small media out there, but I haven't looked too much.
But I doubt aggregating headlines would really give you an accurate picture
Just to make a comparison with what we have now. If writing about famous or non-famous people dying suddenly from unknown medical causes without any known chronic disease before 70yo is clickbait, it must be because people are curious about such matters? Kind of a man-bite-dog kind of news.
I'm sure a lot of antivaxxers are looking to stimulate their confirmation bias but can it be the only reason that'd be clickbait?
Job
1yr ago
Is there a tool similar to Google Trends but for media headlines?
That would allow one to look up keywords and see how prevalent they were over the years in online newspapers' articles or headlines that can be found on Google News for example.
The Dailystormer and other respectable publications are constantly highlighting reporting of young, fit-looking people 'dying suddenly' or 'unexpectedly' and connecting it with the mass-scale RNA injection experiment undertaken in the West.
I'd like to test that claim if possible by comparing headlines from 2022 to 2019 and earlier.
This the President
Them the ones getting eliminated by the President
Let's see what the 'New Ukrainians' look like once Zelensky is done with Ukraine.
More options
Context Copy link