BANNED USER: Constant low-value, low-effort antagonistic poster
Job
No bio...
User ID: 1485
Banned by: @Amadan
Job
2yr ago
The difficulty with the current social mores is that you have to determine the truth values of contradicting advice, and act on it in a sociopathic manner:
-women are just like men, they deserve the same respect, plain speaking, no need to take kiddie-gloves for them (mainstream media feminism/women page articles)
-women are fragile animals full of emotion, that, similarly to children, you can trick into buying your products (the ads running on the side or intersped with the content of the aforementioned articles)
To date successfully, a man has to claim to genuinely believe the former, to the grave, while in practice behaving ruthlessly like the latter (marketing/ad professional), and make it seem effortless, as if there was never any contradiction to resolve.
Once this premise is begrudgingly somewhat internalized, the main obstacle becomes a combination of idealism/integrity and ego.
We want to believe Hollywood lies about the poor, unattractive nerd getting a love story with the girl next door, after he stopped believing in incel conspiracies or started showering or what not.
We want to believe that women will just give the average man a fair chance.
And more than anything we want to believe that we are great as we are and we shouldn't change anything to attract a woman.
I think the greatest tragedy in all of this is how much effort smart men end up deploying before they can secure one wife. For the 50-80% of men who cannot effortlessly attract women they are attracted to, securing a long-term partner becomes a long-term hobby, or a second career. How many of the nerds on this website have dating sites statistics memorized, like Scott Adams with FBI crime statistics?
But but but I just can't believe in God, it doesn't make sense, cries the atheist, before spending the next decade crying about the unfairness of the dating market generated by his elders' criminal apostasy.
Job
2yr ago
Presumably that since it's easier to have gay sex than seducing women, men who chose to have gay sex over seducing women did so out of desperation.
Conversely, women are more attracted to men who have a history of seducing women.
Job
2yr ago
Yes it's not Jews in Hollywood, it's Jews in academia, government, the media and Hollywood.
As Joe Biden puts it:
“Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense.
Job
2yr ago
You really can't think of any reason why the West, a civilization whose left-wing intellectuals cast the Holocaust as a mortal and unique sin in the 60s, would make lots of movies about the Holocaust but not as many about a civilization they don't belong to?
And what is the reason that that civilization's left-wing individuals elected to cast the Holocaust as a mortal and unique sin? Pure coincidence?
Job
2yr ago
It's not a normie comment to say that not eating too much food works when half the population doesn't seem capable of maintaining a healthy size.
Fat people's opinions on dieting are obviously biased in the worst direction, with thin people's opinions having higher value, and formerly-fat-but-now-durably-thin people's opinions even higher.
Job
2yr ago
Nobody ever tries to put these fat people in work camps.
If WW2 history classes have taught anyone anything, it's that dieting works.
Job
2yr ago
Everything is socially constructed, but society is biologically constructed.
The way we understand medicine is socially constructed but nobody uses 'actually cancer is a social construct' as a gotcha, or in order to get some kind of cancer-benefits in absence of medical evidence of cancer.
Job
2yr ago
The alt-right sees jews as adversaries, and responsible for harming the country / going against what they think Western civilization should be.
For example, regarding foreign policy:
America has bullied every single country on earth, and is presently in the process of bullying all of Western Europe, most of Latin America, black Africans, Asians, and several different Moslem countries.
If Americans don’t like big countries bullying smaller countries, they should stop supporting the sickening Jew government.
[...]
Not only is this skittish individual a member of the elite ruling establishment of the global anal empire, he’s Jewish.
What did the Jews do to Palestine, Jew, if not literally “erase it from the map”?
Here's a compilation of reactions to a fundraiser for the ADL, an organization promoting antisemitism:
You should not have tried to destroy Ye. It was a very, very bad move.
The history books will remember the smearing and bankrupting of Ye as the beginning of the end of the Jewish dominion over America.
Fundamentally, the alt-righters see the ADL and other groups as opposed to their interests.
Job
2yr ago
I was gonna make a top level but I guess this is already tangentially the topic.
According to the New Stateman, Russel Brand is now far-right?
Brand launched into a tinny rant that encompassed every right-wing signalling trope: the ghoulish mainstream media, the dishonest and untrustworthy pharmaceutical industry, the West’s shameful treatment of Julian Assange and “American hero” Edward Snowden, and the Covid drug Ivermectin. He then pivoted leftwards, and rounded off his angry sermon with an endorsement for, erm, Bernie Sanders.
Glenn Greenwald (Dailystormer darling // He might be a homosexual Jew, but Glenn Greenwald is a legend and a hero, and his recent piece ripping apart the hall monitor censorship beat of the mainstream media is the article of the year.) comments:
For as long as I can remember, those views - contempt for corporate media and Big Pharma, anger over mistreatment of "heroes" Assange and Snowden - were deeply associated with the Western left.
They're views I always held and still did. Now these are right-wing views? Evidently.
Is it now right-wing to signal distrust of Big Pharma, corporate media and opposing desert wars?
Job
2yr ago
Maybe LGBTQUP+ people should start their own schools like the Catholics if they don't like the government keeping their propaganda out of public education.
Job
2yr ago
Job
2yr ago
There's still that Building 7 that just collapsed without getting hit by a plane that was kind of fake?
Job
2yr ago
Are you denying that there is a racial component to 'black lives matter'? Instead of a less racially charged name like 'End police brutality'?
Where was Briahna when Ashli Babbitt was summarily executed by Capitol police for trespassing unarmed?
Where was Briahna when James Fields was charged multiple life sentences for hitting a car in front of him during a protest with no law enforcement control?
In the same exact video Briahna even mentions Rittenhouse in a disparaging manner.
By Briahna's logic, nobody should have attacked Rittenhouse. He may have committed some kind of offense by 'crossing state lines' with a rifle or being at a riot or what not, but that does not justify attempting to murder him with a gun or a skateboard!
(again, graduated from harvard law, co-hosted a left-wing podcasts with "Virgil Texas"
I don't see how this informs her motivation for decreasing law enforcement against her kin.
Here is the quote:
'Joyriding is very common, people joyride in all kinds of communities, teenagers go and try to find open cars, ride around and abandon them on the side of the road. You can look up statistics about how common this is...'
My prior is that this is an unexpected statement coming out of a Harvard's graduate's mouth.
It seems that they're letting all kind of riffraffs in these schools now.
Good for diversity right? We need more prosecutors and judges that are familiar with petty criminals, career criminals, otherwise, how could they possibly do a good job?
Virgil Texas also looks like the kind of guy that would hate the white tribe and would stand for black criminals over white families.
Here she is in that video claiming that police violence affects blacks disproportionately.
Which is not true, black people interact more frequently with the police, due to the whole committing half of the violent crime thing, they are not disproportionately killed when adjusted for frequency of interaction.
She even says at 17:36
What specifically are you as a politician going to do for black people? Which is a very reasonable question to ask.
Imagine somebody claiming that it would be reasonable to ask politicians
What specifically are you going to do for white people?
Seems like she wants people to go out of their way to do things specifically for her kin.
here we have white people participating in black power bombings! Along with black people! How does this fit into the 'radical black progressivism is black ethnic tribalism'
Some whitish people identify with the black tribe, or at least against the white tribe. There are a number of articles written by whitish journalists out there that essentially amount to 'white people are terrible'. That does not say anything of black people's motivations for supporting their own tribe and selectively demanding more relaxed law enforcement.
That was 50 years ago and these people are still around, some of them barely did any time for terrorism.
Susan Rosenberg was involved in BLM for example.
The default of American society is to favor blacks and disfavor whites, at all levels of government.
We are all complicit in this anti-white system, again, that does not really say anything about the motivation of black people themselves.
If violence, such as killing a 13 yo kid is a bad thing, then surely, black criminals committing ~50% of the violent crime is a bad thing.
If one wanted to alleviate this issue, and a more violent police was found to reduce the rate of violent crime, wouldn't that be progress, according to Briahna?
If the police killing 10% more innocent black kids every year was able to reduce the violent crime committed against black kids, to reduce the overall total black victims of violence, shouldn't BLM support that solution?
The murder rate is currently rising in majority-black cities in the last couple years, and this is associated with the police pulling back due to public outcry over brutality.
I don't know if causation can be found, but it seems that the public outcry against the police is hurting black people.
I believe that Briahna should stop advocating for more safety for black criminals.
Job
2yr ago
Maybe we could just educate people not to commit crimes, police forces would lose significant power then.
Job
2yr ago
The other issue is that a lot of the benefits of 'traditional' women does not rest in one individual woman.
If you're not importing the whole family, your traditional SEA wife is going to have the same or a worse support system than your regular corn-syrup-fed one, so raising children will be tremendously stressful.
The other component of that issue is that the SEA women that choose to leave will be on the less-traditional side of SEA, otherwise they would not leave.
That should still put them on a better footing than the local women, but could also be worse, if they are 100% green card/golddiggers.
Or they have unrealistic expectations of life in the USA (thinking they'll be moving to Miami Beach or the Upper East Side or whatever sitcom/movie fantasy). Or they don't have unrealistic expectations and the USA are just as bad as they had the impression from their traditional village, and they hate being there.
If you're not specifically seeking a traditional woman, but just a woman that is able to stick to a marriage for longer than a local one, then probably some foreign college-educated, traveling-abroad one might be good enough.
The other option is the straight-off-the-boat, 1st generation English-speaker of the family, not completely disgusted by US norms but still retaining traditional upbringing and family nearby. It would take more effort to find and court these.
Job
2yr ago
Now that's a fun place to do exotic dating.
The white SA women be willing and they may be more 'redpilled' than you...
Job
2yr ago
I don't remember the exact quote, but she makes a point that joyriding is a common, and rather innocuous activity.
I doubt that a white liberal would claim that.
I saw similar claims from black twitter users that a cop should not have shot a black teenager(?) that was actively engaged in stabbing another teenager(?) because knife-fighting is a rather common and harmless activity that young people engage in. I doubt that this is a viewpoint that makes white people comfortable.
The way American media presented it was by cutting the bodycam video at the point where you can see the black perp dropping the knife. If they thought that knife-fighting was a harmless past-time that would not turn down their sheepish viewership from supporting BLM, why did they cut it?
My understanding of the white support of BLM is that they have a poor understanding of the actual violence cops have to deal with in the US. If they are advocating for violent criminals to be straight up released, they are not asking for that in their own neighborhood.
But when we see Brianna's white friends, or harvard-educated friends, be similarly outraged about BLACK BABIES being killed, that doesn't work?
They're insulated from black violence. Sure they'd love to see fewer black babies harmed, in a vacuum, until these black babies are literally holding them at gunpoint, then they'll demand the police, or the federal marshalls
Federal Judge Susan Dlott wrote the book on racial profiling in 2002.
“There’s three black men with guns at our house,” Dlott told a 911 operator after she escaped the home invasion and ran to her neighbor’s house one mile away.
That’s Racial Profiling 101: Identifying the criminals by race, as if that had something to do with it.
Some of these people don't see themselves as white, and see themselves as on the same side as the blacks, which is why they are demanding ethnic spoils. Demanding ethnic spoils for another tribe is performative, a form of Law of Jante, but for the blacks like Briahna, it is straight up 'taking what's ours'.
Not that all blacks necessarily believe that, but that's a commonly observed sentiment, and it's not like American culture in general provides any sort of pushback against the idea that 'blacks are owed everything'.
Job
2yr ago
Interestingly, the one hapa guy had issues because his Asian mom would not let him bring girls around for fear that they'd steal her white husband.
The fetish is not always on the side you expect.
Job
2yr ago
This is why men ought to look for women in circles where women are competing on being 'trad'.
Find the right meme-culture and you will find women that are just as enthusiastic for breeding as you are.
Then all you have to do is compete with the other trad-minded men, and it's not that hard imo.
It comes with another sets of demands, like providing for a set of children, actually fitting the trad-meme culture yourself, etc, but what other choices do you have?
If you're looking for a woman to have 3 kids in the Bay Area or NYC, you're doing it wrong, but there are ways to get that done, like being an Orthodox Jew in the latter, for example.
Job
2yr ago
Isn't being able to rob cars without risking getting shot a form of ethnic spoils?
If shooting a car-robber makes one a criminal, what should be the appropriate punishment for such criminals according to Briahna? Restorative justice? Immediate cashless bail? Benefits like in Richmond CA?
Job
2yr ago
I was trying to follow the path of sino friendship advocated by the Anglin fellow and some others, in the face of eternal militaristic Americans, but Guangxi Massacre hits hard.
I knew that Western travelers in China reported them having elaborate cookbooks for human flesh but that was centuries ago...
Now the White Man is a frog in a boiling pot, must it stay in there and have its kids turned gay, mutilated and sterilized, lobotomized, propagandized, or jump in the actual boiling pot and literally be boiled and eaten?
A priori the White liberal is still a more direct, mortal enemy than the Chinese, but clearly Asian dominance is not sustainable in the long run.
At least for the ones forcibly brought overseas.
We see them do a lot worse in metrics that are relevant to success in capitalism such as time preference, literacy, numeracy, civility or manners, almost any metric one can imagine relevant to commercial success, and these metrics have strong biological underpinnings.
Usually whatever gene variant is associated with the worse outcome in phenotype for a capitalist society (ie increased violence or reduced intellectual function) will be more prevalent in Subsaharian African in studies, but these are controversial and not that common.
Some studies related to that can be found here, mostly from the 2010s, I haven't really kept up to date with the most relevant science.
This article from 22 seems to claim that using geographical categorization makes for bad science and leads to violence, continuously referring to a single shooting that happened that year.
While I don't know whether or not it makes for bad science, I think using the fragments of science that are still being published using geographical denominations would probably decrease violence, if one were to believe the FBI crime statistics.
Indeed, they quote one of the scientists:
Benjamin’s hope is that polygenic scores developed for educational attainment and other measures of behavioral and social traits will one day improve the analysis of social science experiments. As he envisions it, the scores could be used in randomized studies, in much the same way that scientists try to control for family income or parents’ educational level. The thinking is that by controlling for genetics, researchers could better estimate the effectiveness of interventions.
Regarding the issue with maladaptation to capitalist societies, which some people call 'structural racism':
The few that manage to attain success and status in our capitalist society happen almost by accident.
If there was no audience for their brawling, their singing and dancing or their running and throwing, most of them would not be successful, and these are people that are outliers of their group already.
While these top sportsmen and entertainers do command a certain amount of luxury and status, they are still employees, or even commodities, traded by powerful capitalist owners.
Who's to say what life they would have on the continent? Would they not make impressive warlords? Powerful tribes chiefs?
Out of the few African-American distinguished for some level of legitimate intellectual achievement, I can't help but notice that they usually show significant non-African admixture. Some people question if Obama is African at all, or Indonesian, MLK is another example.
NASA recently named a moon mountain for Melba Mouton. I'd be surprised if she were more than 50% African.
Job
2yr ago
I disagree with this view.
In my opinion, a great deal of harm was caused to Africans when the wheel was introduced to their continent then combustion engines, electricity and telecommunications.
Being forced to compete in an artificial capitalist economy is unfair when you are biologically less suited than others to that competition, but well-suited to your natural environment that is displaced by the capitalists.
There is a lot of talk about the harm caused to the enslaved people that were transported in state-of-the-art (at the time) boats across the seas and the centuries, and their descendants.
Clearly their suffering matters a lot more (in terms of how many people care about it) than the suffering of their cousins who were just as enslaved, murdered and brutalized but on their original continent.
The difference is that one side had a glimpse of 'what could be'.
Non-African capitalists have been dangling the carrot of civilization in front of Africans for centuries now, never to quite reach it.
Imagine if aliens came to Earth and showed everybody what fully automated luxury communism is but only slightly different people than you got to partake in it, everybody else only getting 30% of the utopia. Wouldn't that be a form of harm? Wouldn't you have been happier if you hadn't had a glimpse of paradise on Earth, without getting told that you specifically does not get to have it?
This is essentially the black experience in the West.
The movie Elysium touches on this, I believe, it is no surprise that the director is a white South-African.
But you do know that FWB are a thing, right?
And there are men that successfully proposition women for sex point blank.
And the women not only accept, but feel flattered and tell their friends to make them jealous.
The rule is to be attractive, not unattractive.
Also the men that are successful at this are also probably aware whether or not the women are interested before asking, as they are aware of their sexual worth.
The issue is with generally unattractive men. Any kind of sexual approach will fail for them. They could spend 6 months courting the one lady and it would still fail if she decided in the first minute that she is not attracted to them.
Their failure is not for using the wrong magic words or behavior, but for improperly assessing their sexual attractiveness.
The issue when being an unattractive man is that you see other people successfully dating, so while interacting in a variety of ways with a variety of women, you misinterpret a variety of subtle rejections in different ways.
'she's not immediately wincing at me and politely smiles at me so she must like me'.
If a woman rejects the unattractive man in a polite manner, he gets to imagine that he did better than with the other woman that was having a bad day and rudely put him down for imagining he had a chance with her. 'This rejection went better, I should tweak what I did today and next time it will work.'
What they need to do is actually something along of working out a lot to appear more attractive, getting a lot of money and power to signal status, or fame, or just a lot of drugs and finding the women that are into that.
Or becoming a violent man that can signal spilling blood, that works too with some women (see the ones sending love letters to convicted serial killers).
More options
Context Copy link