@Job's banner p
BANNED USER: Constant low-value, low-effort antagonistic poster

Job


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 3 users  
joined 2022 October 04 23:03:46 UTC

				

User ID: 1485

Banned by: @Amadan

BANNED USER: Constant low-value, low-effort antagonistic poster

Job


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 3 users   joined 2022 October 04 23:03:46 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1485

Banned by: @Amadan

Can anybody explain the Polish perspective on the Ukraine war?

I went to Poland and it looked like what Western Europe should look like. The urban areas were clean and seemingly safe. Indeed the people living there are mostly European or Slavic.

My understanding is that most of the tsunami of African or Middle-Eastern immigrants of the 2000s would rather go to Western Europe or Scandinavia for better welfare or economic prospects.

Still, Poland used to get in trouble with the EU for not wanting to take in a certain amount of them.

Moreover, Poland has also faced reprimand from the same union for their policies toward non-heterosexuals.

Why did Poland even join the EU? Did they really need the money so badly at the time?

Now it seems that Poland is going toward ever more alignment with the EU and US.

Are they really so scared of Russia that they would drink the corn syrup and give up on whatever is left of their culture/sovereignty/demographics?

Is anybody of relevance in Poland even attempting to contradict the pro-Western turn?

  • -14

To anyone who has discussed the issue with pro-Ukraine people.

Why do people support Ukraine fighting against Russia, with a strange militaristic fervor, instead of supporting surrendering / negotiating peace?

Anglin makes the points that:

-the war is severely impoverishing Europe due to high energy costs

-the war is destroying Ukraine ( population + territory / infrastructures / institutions)

-continuing the war increases the chances of a world war

Is it cheering for the possible destruction of Russia?

Something to do with the current leadership of Russia, anti-LGBTQ, pro-family policies?

Is it about the 1991 borders of Ukraine, issues with post-Soviet Union border disputes?

Notion that 'if we don't stop Putin now he will never stop no matter what'? Is it something about broadly standing up against aggression of one state vs another, supporting the 'underdog'?

The issue with that one which seems to be central to Alexander's March 22 post is that there isn't much that seems capable of stopping Russia.

Sending another 100k Ukrainians to the meatgrinder for that end seems a little bit harsh coming from people with very little skin in the game.

Just signaling what they are told is the correct opinion?

Is it about saving face, sunk cost at this point?

What would be the best case scenario for a Ukraine/State Department victory?

To my understanding, Putin is not the most radical or dangerous politician in Russia, and an implosion into ethnicity-based sub-regions would cause similar problems to the 'Arab Spring'. Chechens for example would not appear very West-friendly once 'liberated' from Russia.

Not only that, but economic crisis in Europe could generate additional security risks.

  • -13

If they're so smart, why did they fall for the psy-op?

I can see smart teenagers fall for it because they're too busy to study to go online and 'do their own research' which has been the easiest thing in history since circa 2005.

Anyone with a certain brain processing power that has lived in the Western world for 20+ years has no excuse.

Weren't you around for the Iraq WMD or any of these dozens of disasters resulting from trusting government and corporations?

It really boils down to ethnocentrism and xenophobia.

African-Americans and their allies commit large-scale arson for several months and the result is the non-African-American majority's response is : 'Well maybe they have a point, maybe we can be nicer to these people, let's give them some reparations or whatever'.

Meanwhile African-American entertainers complain about unfair business practices, nepotism, dishonest contracts and other unfortunate experiences from Jewish millionaires and billionaires and the response is 'oy vey, how dare you claim I hold disproportionate power in this society, I'm shutting down your contracts and your bank accounts.'

As a group, the Jews encourage and profit from multiculturalism in other countries, where they have access to the highest positions and where they deploy extensive lobbying groups, but they can always retreat to Israel that they have shaped as an ethnostate where they have primacy over other groups.

The worse thing? It's not the scheming, the money-laundering, the international human trafficking / blackmailing networks... It's the hypocrisy!

First off thank you for your sensible assessment

to the typical overreaction of jewish media people, or what you could call members of the 'jewish mafia'.

Every criticism of an individual jew is antisemitism, every criticism of jewish power is antisemitism, using words like 'jewish mafia' to describe existing groups is antisemitism, while it is factual and not describing 'all jews'.

As Chapelle put it, a group of Italian criminals is a Mafia while a group of jews is a coincidence.

Yeah, I think Israel has a right to exist, but I don't think I have to believe that as a consequence of being Jewish.

As a jewish ethnostate?

Or should Israel be decolonized like South Africa or every other colony? With reparations, reconciliation commissions etc.

but he is a white nationalist who, at the absolute least, does not treat the holocaust with reverence mocks those who do.

Why should anybody treat the holocaust with reverence?

The Dailystormer made the point a while back that American jews mostly identify as atheist but they made the holocaust their religion. They had some poll to back it up. Your parents/family obsessed so much about the holocaust that you see nazis under your bed.

The holocaust was allegedly a century ago, all the alleged perpetrators are dead... The only people that remotely affiliate themselves with the perps are Ukrainian Banderas fangirls that the overwhelmingly jewish Biden admin is sending billions to.

Nobody cares about that, not even Zelensky, who actually lives in the very area it supposedly took place.

Everybody's ancestors went through their own share of suffering.

That should not put anyone above blame.

Jews are massively overrepresented in all facets of American power. They are less than 1% of the population but you can't turn on tv or open a newspaper website to see their opinion plastered everywhere.

Should jews have a say in American governance? Sure, at a proportional rate. <1%, whatever their population rate is, of all positions of power.

Not 1/3, 1/4, 1/8, 1/10 or whatever we see now. There should be 0 jewish supreme court justices ruling on whether or not white and black American women should be allowed to kill their kids.

Check your jewish privilege.

Sit down and listen to the black man.

The fact is that people usually get cancelled, and cancelled hard, when they say something mildly antisemitic (and mostly true) like 'jews control the media'.

Meanwhile journalists and editors and publishers excrete headlines like 'X is too white', 'Dear white people...', 'Yes all white people...'...

Most of the critiques aimed at white people actually apply to jews and even more, as American jews are on average more wealthy, powerful, connected than white people.

Even the concept of a jewish genocide is somewhat racist at this point.

If jews didn't have this strange obsession with pairing up with people with comically oversized noses and ears who stay away from military service and honest work, would anybody even be able to tell them apart?

Why do jews have an inherent right to exist as a distinct people, if white people are told by endless racemixing propaganda that they do not have a right to their own country and that denying romantic advances from POC is racist?

To summarize - you think Ukraine is a non playable character. No ability to create their own destiny.

In my opinion Ukraine is not a character. Proof of it is that the main leader of that 'nationalist' country is Jewish, thus not sharing the same ethnicity as most people in Ukraine and Russia (slavic), and was even sued a couple years ago for not using the official language (Ukrainian, a regional dialect of Russian that he learned as an adult) in official settings, Most people in that country speak Russian but the government has been playing a game of forcing Ukrainian as the official 'language', similarly to French in Quebec.

Aside from that, they cannot possibly win against Russia on their own, and they've been struggling with intelligence, spec ops and billions dollars in support from the richest country in the world.

Ukraine also had the ability to create their own destiny when they had pro-Russia leaders until that color revolution that brought in actors like Zelensky in charge.

I guess that was not the right type of democracy back then.

Poland cares about these borders. And a bunch of other smaller post Soviet countries in NATO all of which would have to decide on going to full hot war with Russia. Whether the US joins or not half of nato would likely end up in a hot war with Russia.

I don't think that's in question at this point.

One can also question why Poland would decide to strengthen ties to EU/NATO when they already put themselves on the bad side of the EU before for their treatment of LGBTQ+ minorities.

They may have ultimately more in common with the Russian block than the Western block, but that's up to them to figure out.

And Russia isn’t the ally I want against globohomo.

Which one is it then? Let's have globohomo fully destroy Western Europe because Russia bad?

This is not a requirement to be Jewish. They do not go looking for converts, but it is possible to convert into Judaism.

Not a very common thing to see. At least we can admit that they are pretty insular people.

In the one country where there is a large amount of them, Israel, they can't really be said to be very nice to the non-Jews.

This isn't a component of Judaism, and while it may be a fair description of many (not all) socially liberal Jews, it's not a defining characteristic of "Jewishness."

Your main objection seems to be specifically about contemporary leftist SJ-aligned Jews, yet you made reference to historical "ferocious" refusal to assimilate.

Well, yes. Refusal to assimilate. All the Jews that decided to assimilate converted to Christianity, 2000 years ago.

All the Jews that exist now descend from people that had a chance to convert at some point, and decided not to.

And they've taught their descendants not to.

Similarly to the Amish. The Amish exist because they descend from a line of people that decided not to adopt technology and to teach their children not to. There are very few converts.

At any point in time an Amish person can decide to stop living the Amish life. Sure, they could still be considered Amish, but their children or grand-children would not.

The difference between the Amish and the Jews is that the Amish don't control banking and media corporations, don't control people's livelihood, what they buy, are allowed to buy or what they are allowed to think, who they are allowed to vote for.

Imagine if the owner of TheMotte was talking trash about the Amish and the Amish somehow coordinated with payment processing systems, internet infrastructure companies, other corporations to force the owner to close the website.

And when they would try go tell somebody about these events, their media invites would get cancelled or the media that did decide to host them would get banned from internet infrastructure companies, payment processing companies, etc.

This is what happens very often if not always when somebody talks trash about the Jews.

that's still a long shot from saying "Jews cause anti-Semitism because they all cancelled Kanye and are afraid of being Holocausted and won't assimilate."

This would be fair if that was the first time this ever happened.

Rick Sanchez had the same issues in the 2010s.

Norm was joking about it in the 90s

My point of view is that a conspiracy does not need to exist for the results that we see.

I think that Jews in general, going through the historical selection that they went through, led them to inherit characteristics of people that not only cannot assimilate to a wider body of humanity, but also constantly feel under attack from the majority of humanity, and tend to overreact to that perceived attack, therefore triggering resentment.

Kind of like the common psychological phenomenon of somebody feeling insecure, thinking that everybody is constantly judging or scrutinizing them, therefore projecting an aura of awkwardness wherever they go, and causing people to perceive them as they self-evaluate.

These people find each over and bond over their uniqueness and their vulnerability against the rest of the mean world, and when inevitably their behavior causes the rest of the tribe to suffer, they are the first out the door, and the most likely to survive!

Who is most likely to survive a banking riot, the honest guy that doesn't really have any opinion about banking, or the insider Sam Bankman-Fried, who knows that there's a lot of bad things happening in banking, and if they're not coming for him, the pitchforks outside the windows are not good news anyway?

The easiest for rich, powerful Jews to get others to like them, is to personify noblesse oblige.

Be generous with your money, share your wealth, be a role model for others.

What do so many of them do?

George Soros goes and hires people to make US cities more dangerous (soft on crime DAs).

Others found organizations to help people illegally immigrate to the US (break the laws that protect the American people).

Sam Bankman Fried goes and scams a bunch of do-gooders who wanted to improve charity.

And of course the endless stream of progressive media 'stop whiteness now', 'you are racist for having standards of how your country should be that rich Jews disagree with' etc.

This is historical too. So many Jews could not stand that Americans had a right to self-association so they funded the Civil Rights movement.

The Amish like their life a certain way, they like to live among themselves and not mingle with others, like the Jews, but they're not forcing or even coercing anyone else to live their beliefs, drop their borders, accommodate foreigners, accommodate sexual minorities, drug addicts, etc.

It's a self-fulfilling prophecy.

When you go from 'racism is a property of uniquely evil people called nazis' + 'evil nazis want to kill Jews because they are the good guys' to

'racism is your uniquely original sin and there is nothing you can do to wash it away' + 'somehow this does not apply to similar-looking people called Jews because it just doesn't'.

At some point the people targeted by #2 are going to wonder about #1 and how and why the uniquely evil nazis that they are made to identify with felt about the suspiciously similar but immune people.

Something's gotta give.

The only way to stop antisemitism is identical to the only way to stop racism, for Jews to assimilate. Unlike various races that have been more than happy to blend in together, the current Jews are descended from people that ferociously refused to.

While Jews enjoy a pretty comfortable situation at the top of American society, from an economic, social, prestige pov, they are not satisfied until the goyim grovel and endlessly apologize, even if they are billionaires, even if they are minorities, even if they are beloved, high status entertainment figures.

That's not sustainable.

Supposedly Russia was considering joining NATO in 2000.

The Labour peer recalled an early meeting with Putin, who became Russian president in 2000. “Putin said: ‘When are you going to invite us to join Nato?’ And [Robertson] said: ‘Well, we don’t invite people to join Nato, they apply to join Nato.’ And he said: ‘Well, we’re not standing in line with a lot of countries that don’t matter.’”

The account chimes with what Putin told the late David Frost in a BBC interview shortly before he was first inaugurated as Russian president more than 21 years ago. Putin told Frost he would not rule out joining Nato “if and when Russia’s views are taken into account as those of an equal partner”.

Russia doesn't want to be an American lapdog like Germany or Japan.

and no pride flags (Japan deal).

That was the 1940s deal, American foreign policy prioritizes women's rights and anal sex.

If they tried to teach the Taliban to respect women, why would they not teach the Russians to have anal pride?

While I may not be able to produce clean data to establish my hunch, the dramatic increase in immigration of the 2010s in Western Europe came with a lot of unsanitary conditions and street violence.

I'm not implying that white = clean, as it's Western Europeans who welcomed that uncleanliness, and there are many varied people that are very much capable of cleanliness, for example Singaporeans.

Based on the observation on the ground that (the surveyed areas of) Poland is a very clean country, I'm guessing that the Polish people generally enjoys keeping their environment clean.

The cleanliness is a result of a lack of a certain type of population, which is abundant in Western Europe due to EU policies.

This has me questioning why the Polish government is suddenly so strongly supportive of EU policies, despite what seems like a natural, intrinsic cleanliness of its people.

I'll call one Sandra. She was 30, a computer programmer earning 6 figures, graduated college at 18 and smart, beautiful and accomplished.

Yes she started settling at 30. Leaving her what, the opportunity to have maybe 3 (healthy) kids at best if he's lucky?

Some women get married at 18. She graduated early but too bad she was the wrong sex for that to matter for her romantic prospects. She had been rejecting marriage for over 12 years!

She had even lived with a serious boyfriend between 24 and 29

Who believes that? If he's serious he puts a ring on it within a year. Smart and beautiful woman gets strung along for 5 years. Many such cases! Sad! That must be the one lesson she skipped by spending so much effort on government school.

Doesn't this theory suggest welcoming with open and encouraging arms atheist jews who integrate and marry into normal western society? Yet almost all antisemites suggest that left-wing or revolutionary ordeconstructing jews, most of which aren't that ethically jewish and marry into broader society, are a key driver of societal decay or w/e.

The problem with 'atheists' is that they actually follow a different religion. From example egalitarianism, or 'woke' religion.With Western Jews I would say that their primary religion is the holocaust / antisemitism.

Bad things happen to everyone every day, but every time somebody steps on a Jew's toe, it seems to make international news.

There seems to be a lack of self-reflection as well. Show me a person descended from Jews who says :'you know what, Kanye and Kyrie Irving have a point, these Jews sure have a lot of wealth, maybe they ought to act nicer', who is not trashing Jesus Christ, who is not lambasting white people or anyone else for freedom of association, and I'll be pretty welcoming to them.

Stephen Miller is pretty okay I guess, from what I heard about him.

Ukrainian defeats seems ineluctable to me.

My primary concern is the people getting killed because the Ukrainian nationalists and the EU and US cannot give in on this one border.

Mediterranean border is fine, Mexican border is fine, Ukrainian border is sacred.

Russian gas, Middle-Eastern gas, American gas, there is always some type of dependency to manage.

The Russians aren't that bad compared to some of the other alternatives.

Why?

How much money can you make being a daycare worker?

$30 an hour top? You could get a decent, normal manly job, make $60 an hour and spend the rest of your time fingerpainting if that's your thing.

You could even afford a family and do it with your own children.

Normal people are not going to like the idea of a childless man handling their kids all day, and I think it would be a struggle to get children from a woman making $15/h top.

What did you end up doing?

Unless you mean they should literally stop being Jews?

If by 'being Jews' you refer to '(1)only allowing blood-related people into your religion, claiming that only blood-relation can make you Jewish and (2) the whole other host of beliefs associated with the Holocaust/progressive worldview related to white people and institutions they like being intrinsically racist'.

(2) being most obviously exemplified by the memetic double claim 'fellow white people now is time to end racism/whiteness etc' + 'I'm not white I'm Jewish' when time comes to explain why affirmative action somehow does not apply to Jewish-heavy institutions.

Then yes.

But guess what, that is implicitly and sometimes explicitly what is demanded of white people. 'stop supporting whiteness'.

'stop surrounding yourself with other white people' / 'stop excluding non-whites' / 'stop taking non-whites' space [in formerly white-built institutions]

Why wouldn't it be more inclusive to have every synagogue open to worship Mohammed or even Hitler?

This is just vilifying your outgroup without evidence.

Well then not all Jews (NAJ).

Just the handful of ones that hold such power that they can get a beloved entertainment billionaire African-American to lose a money-printing contract with a sports clothing company.

[ADL & co / Kanye West / Adidas]

But uh oh isn't that an antisemitic trope to claim that a handful of Jews have disproportionate power?!

I'm tired of wah wah wah

It's sure is tough to deal with all these eggheads.

How's that artificial womb project coming along?

We should just get rid of the women category in sports. Let’s them compete at making the most beautiful, smart, compassionate children instead.

If you start from the hypothesis that there are as many men and women raised in progressive vs traditional households, then you see the divergence.

The boys raised in the progressive environment are quick to figure out that the environment has a problem with them.

From there they either take the redpill or the estrogens, and we know what ends up happening to the estrogen'd up ones.

The girls are nurtured in the schools and coddled by corporations, and who can blame them for enjoying the hedonistic cycle a little bit longer than the boys?

The ones that somehow escape this early on will quickly get nabbed by the men, while the other ones end up joining the sad ranks of women in their 30s desperately trying to conceive.

If you're over 70 and took the vaccine, that's fine.

That disease supposedly had a small risk of killing people over 60, and you're only risking suffering from horrible side effects for a couple decades at best.

Another option was to lock up all the people at risk instead of everyone else.

There is a trade-off to these EU policies that most Western European countries apply.

If they are on the receiving end of the migrants from Subsaharian Africa or the Middle-East whose countries were ravaged by their dearest allied CIA-controlled MIC, due to their generous social systems, then they incur significant cost in cleaning and peacekeeping in the areas where they are most concentrated.

I'm thinking of UK, France, Germany, Scandinavia.

While a large amount of Western Europeans despise the effects of these immigrants on their immediate living conditions, they still somehow end up voting 'in majority' for their causes.

'Voting wrong' seems to be worse than uncleanliness and relative lower safety.

Similarly in the US, a lot of people seemingly just let their own neighborhood get burned down by arsonists around 2020. Not much of a fire-preventing spirit them city-folks!

As a thought experiment, name a couple Chinese-American actors, or any other immigrant-descendants who use their influence to subvert European-American values.

One of the only apparently decent people in Hollywood is Keanu Reeves, Americans love his gun movies.

On the other hand, we have a Sarah Silverman who makes Santa Inc.

Statistically speaking there's a jew in new york whose grandpa moved to brooklyn and learned english, and his dad moved to italy and learned italian, and his dad moved to austria and learned austraian, and his dad had to learn greek, and each of them invested in a local business along the way.

Normal people don't do that. Why do you act as if that's evidence of integrating successfully?

Speaking the same language as somebody =/= integrating.

This is an example of integration

A normal person you talk shit to they talk shit back, they don't seize your bank accounts.

Only the high priests of the Holocaust religion make people bow and apologize with real tears.

The alt right seeks to spread, as many have noted, the kind of victim or grievance narrative that exists in much of the rest of the world to white Americans.

I don't think that (was) true. There was a great deal of energy in the US when Trump was first campaigning.

The American people had the sentiment that they could actually get in power, and every tiny step was punctuated by 'Are you tired of winning?!" or something similar, by contrast the other side was doing this

At Charlottesville, they were not saying 'please let us live', they were boldly, defiantly chanting 'Jews will not replace us!'.

Unfortunately, the top specimens of the white race have no incentive to get involved in the fight at this stage.

Things are pretty good, so far.

Once people started getting arrested and elections seemed completely unwinnable forever, what was left to do, politically?

Quite a few people I know have turned religious extremists.

I personally don't see the point of fighting for people who in their large majority have no interest in shaping the future.

Love your neighbor and if your neighbor has faith in anything, he will have children and be part of the future and matter politically.

But there are key differences between the injection and an infection.

If I get infected, I'm getting a few particles as part of a spray.

Where do these particles come from? Well they were built by a virus infecting another person, so if that virus contained RNA sequences that turned the host cell cancerous and unable to produce more viruses, it probably would not be able to produce more particles to infect me.

What is the dose I get? Probably something proportional to the amount of air I'm able to breathe.

If I'm a large guy, I'm probably inhaling a lot of air all at once, so more of these particles.

If I'm more pocket-sized, I would guess that I'm not inhaling as much of the virus at once.

I don't know how many of them there are, but they are diluted among other stuff in the particle itself, in the air, into my mucosa, my mucus. Right there and then my immune system starts taking charge of some of them.

My nose, my mouth, my mucosa were created by God to expect such aggression.

It's business as usual.

Then some of these particles manage to actually infect cells and the virus manages to replicate itself yadda yadda.

All in my nose, in my mucosa, maybe slightly deeper in my lungs, idk the details of covid infection.

If I get injected, I get a certain amount of liquid (few ml) at a certain rather uniform concentration all in the same spot. Not a spray.

What is the dose I get? The dose that Pfizer/Moderna decided to put in the bottle.

Supposedly the same dose for everybody. So presumably a dose containing enough material to 'work' for people that are 300 lbs or over.

This is all going straight into the fat of my arm, or if the remaining medical staff that fell for the psy-op and didn't quit due to vaccine mandates messed up, straight into my blood.

The material is coming from a factory, where products are sometimes defective, processes can go wrong, quality controls can be overlooked, concentrations can vary, effectiveness, quality, purity of the material might be compromised.

That is if the owners of the factory are not purposefully committed to making poison.

Was the fat of my arm or my blood stream made by God to receive a dose of RNA? No.

Is this expected by my immune system? No.

We are talking about different tissues, different cell types. Different doses. Chemically different substances. Different modes of administration.

anyone genuinely worried about the effects of the vaccine on the human genome should be just about paralyzed with fear given the levels of random viral infection we're all exposed to on a daily basis.

The virus never came out and say that cutting boys' peepees will turn them female, unlike all the doctors pushing the vaccine.

Some people have even called the virus racist, it's hard not to sympathize.

I'm not disagreeing with the figures and what happened.

Maybe a lot of these high-achievers really didn't have the time to do their own research and just went with the flow out of habit.

And maybe they are high IQ, but that would suggest to me that they need to add a few questions to IQ tests similar to the Voigt-Kampff test

'The tortoise lies on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs trying to turn itself over. But it can’t. Not without your help. But you’re not helping.'

'Why aren't you helping?'