@Lizzardspawn's banner p

Lizzardspawn


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 14:36:46 UTC

				

User ID: 594

Lizzardspawn


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 14:36:46 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 594

Or use a crossbow.

That is up to him, not to Pete.

Absolutely not. Because it was pure raw uncut bullshit justification to begin with. So if they can tie it to privacy, then privacy of execution is much easier to tie to the right to privacy.

We are literally living in George Carlin sketch.

This is stupid. I don't think that public executions are a bad thing per se. But if you want to instate that federal executions should be public - there should be somewhat of a process, not by fiat, and not make it exceptional occasion.

Also not a chance in hell this will happen - if SCOTUS thought that right to privacy gives you right to abortion, if sure as hell gives you literal right to privacy for your execution. I do support the condemned to be able to waiver it and make it as public or private as they desire.

Someone designed it, someone implemented it as a series of instructions.

Unlike the backpropagated transformers that just emerged from nothingness.

A good analogy - LLMs are viruses level stuff on the consciousness evolution step. They can't form homeostatic processes. We are far away from the moon is a harsh mistress.

I think the right believes women need strong limitations on sexual rights and cultural traditions preventing let’s call it sluttiness or their love will end up being temporary.

The right believed mostly what the old time feminists believed - that a woman in charge of her sexuality also bears responsibility for her actions and outcomes. Most of the edgelordiness online is just backlash to the change of no means no to yes means yes to yes means no four years later after the fact.

And do you know what is the most red pilling event of them all - to see a woman you hold dear return for 18th time in her abusive relationship "because I love him" after she was beaten up regularly. The pure red hot rage that you can't save someone from their own stupidity.

What is the difference compared to playing sims throwing your sim in the pool and removing the ladder?

The arctic road is opening and russia and usa in alliance control all of it. Russia has no desire or capacity for European hegemony. The relationship between Europe and USA is irrelevant to USA because - well we are useless. Even united we can't become a threat to USA power any more - nor military nor economically - 20 years of Brussels rule made sure of that. We have huge problems with immigration and future immigration. Europe is decaying. Even totalitarian military junta won't fix our problems.

The Sino Soviet split was the deathblow of the cold war, now USA have to do it in the other direction.

And let’s be clear we are at war with Russia.

Repeating lets be clear many times doesn't make the following statement any truer. Not every minor geopolitical adversity is war.

First - we don't want to. Obviously Trump is not suffering by the sand in the vagina syndrome (real idiom from my country btw) that Macron, Ursula and Boris have on the topic.

Second - Russia is not in war with the USA and this is why USA is treating them ambivalently - i have often said that USA - RU alliance is too natural for it not to happen eventually. Yes Washington is making Moscow's life harder when it is low cost and for the lulz, but they don't really give a fuck about it. Which I think even people close to Zelensky start to realize, even if he is too dense to see it.

Third - unlike some of the elite human capital that is better candidate to be deported - he is not a parasite, he is not a drain on the safety net, not breaking any laws, he is culturally integrated, making a good salary - so why bother.

What happens when you combine crazy russian, ai, warhammer and madmax?

Only for the brave.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=ggfw1i9XIbs

I believe that Nate Silver wants to be right and does his best.

Now the question is not whether you take said sources seriously, but whether you do it consistently or not. Empirical evidence is that people that are under the impression they are winning are not busy unskewing the polls. When the Iowa gold standard poll came out two years ago, republicans didn't try to prove that it is wrong, they just laughed at it. With good reasons.

I have taken Nate seriously for more than a decade so far (and he has always given Trump higher chances than the rest of his cohort, so there is that), so if I have to make exception now - there has to be good reasons for it. This year may be different - but the only different thing so far is that I really dislike his prognosis.

Now if your gut tells you that Republicans are in better shape than presented, and said gut was also mostly right about the 2016-2024 elections - I will say - great - a track record is a track record.

Do you have links towards serious analysis why polls are terribly wrong that is not fueled by binge on copium and hopium?

I agree with you. Doesn't change the fact that USA is unfortunately functioning democracy and people are swayed by the strain on their wallets. If Trump manages to hold to some legislative power he may as well be celebrated as visionary 20 years down the line - especially when we see what joy and benefits diversity brings on France's streets now. But doesn't change that winning elections in democracy is not optional.

Polymarket believes blue wave, Nate silver believes blue wave, polls predict blue wave, RCP believes blue wave, rumors are that GOP insiders believe blue wave, I am pro Trump also - but I think that his absolute remarkable dumb political luck has finally ran out. A nominal majority is control when it comes to appointments and passing laws.

Second most important. The most important always will be cost of living. And the only way I could characterize the Trump foreign policy signature issue - tariffs is difunctional.

I am genuinely surprised that the polls insist on a Democrat sweep at this stage.

The Trump administration has been extraordinarily chaotic. And dysfunctional. Also war.

The USA is definitely getting little bang for its buck procurement wise.

There is a reason why Slaanesh is called she who thirsts. She definitely fits the lore.

I would strongly suggest you read The Sarantine Mosaic. Thank me later.

Julian

Steinbeck is the closest the USA has produced to "Russian literature masterpiece" and Florence Pugh is too full of vis vitalis to make good tragic characters. She just doesn't have the slowly weathered away soul and suffering in solitude in it.

It was.

That is only because they couldn't cast Pedro Pascal as Cathy. At least they got the skin color right.

Glide bombs are awesome. I await eagerly the day when someone will reinvent that the easiest lift is with automated zeppelins and make carpet bombing great again.