@Lizzardspawn's banner p

Lizzardspawn


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 14:36:46 UTC

				

User ID: 594

Lizzardspawn


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 14:36:46 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 594

Yes, but it wasn't principled. It was to get cheap shot at openai and lure the antitrump SV to use Claude when Codex started seriously catching up with them.

That is based on the assumption that Anthropic have principles. Which the real world experience doesn't show it is true.

Chef's kiss. The subtle deviousness of the USG demonstrated by taking Anthropic at their word. From what I see on HN - people are quite entertained by it. Seems that Dario has ground a lot of gears with his safetysm. And in a way - the USG is absolutely right. If the technology is as potent and dangerous as they claim - then it is not up to Anthropic to decide who can use it and for what.

Unfortunately the timing could be better - it should have been given just before their IPO is irreversible, but enough to tank them hard.

Only the gypsies. The majority is absolutely Slavic - probably 70-sh percent of people have ivory skin. Just that gypsies and the turkish minority (also quite fairly skinned) are overrepresented in emigration. There aren't many people with hair on the back there.

Unfortunately no. We are headed towards a depression. AI is essentially deflationary. What it is best at is reducing demand and destroying added value.

Think of the following scenario - lets just say that 3d printing advances a bit more, as is home cnc, sheet metal bending and laser cutting. And add a bipedal robot. Suddenly all you have to buy from there on is basic commodities and semiconductors.

The total and utter crap that were the Craig era movies after casino royale (which I think is the best bond movie post Connery), showed that the Casino turned out that way by accident. Afterwards was - we found what works and now it is time to excise it with great precision.

We live in a world in which noticing the strong correlation between demographics and how shitty a place to live is strongly discouraged. Even if it has substantial predictive power.

French speakers from gulf of africa are on the top of my list.

Tranquilize that unicorn and put a mark on her ear.

The system we have works terrible. Even if we assume that removing/restricting the power of copyright will reduce the content created - we are producing too much anyway.

It is not about comprehension. Heavy Indian accent speakers are way easier to understand than some other.

Are there any studies from linguists what makes the Indian accent so hard on the ears? Btw - I expect this to change in generation or two - everyone is immersed in english media now from birth, so more kids learn english simultaneously with their maternal one.

The new diablo 4 explansion. the game turns into path of exile light. That is a good thing in my book. What can I say - junkies gonna junk.

Both will be amusing

what’s your legal theory behind why certain groups of people should have their speech suppressed

Because by creating LLC they have deliberately separated themselves from the company. Or more specifically if the person doesn't wear the brunt of the liability and is shielded, then stripping the corporation of rights doesn't infringe on the owner's rights.

That was the inevitable end game in the whole corporate personhood thing.

  • -14

Can I only point how clustered they are? Unless this coding benchmark is heavily logarithmic in weighting the models - the results say that all of the models are good enough.

The deepseek one

No. They just became good in price gouging - which is hidden and subtle.

Already almost there if you include all Chinese companies, certainly will be by end of 2026: https://livebench.ai

Deepseek 4 pro blows Codex 5.3 out of the water in real world usage.

Yes, or a bright teenager with nothing better to do, for that matter.

The last time that was true was when ROP-s were in vogue.

The whole of civilization and industrialization has been underpinned by using energy to achieve superhuman feats. Most of the worries so far about AI are thin veil for some people's fear that their greatest labor asset will lose value rapidly. And probably some narcissistic injury if we are using LP definitions.

If I didn't get worried that we created cars that could run 20 times faster than a human 24/7 or that we have trivialized the magic of flying to the point that it is utterly trivial, boring and so on, why should I worry that some machine will think better than me. Hell - I should be worried if we don't invent such a machine. Whatever you can think of - we are running out of it - out of soil, out of biomass, out of oil. We need faster science progression to get out of the trap that is our lovely blue planet.

And your predictions are tame because they fit linear advancement at current rates. And we will probably get there even on log. Your definition of AGI is modest.

So pretty mild stuff, although I do find your definition of AGI/ASI somewhat texas sharpshooter style. On the other hand no one seems to have to be able to define those things in a way that is better so there's that.

Still useful, but picking off only mildly interesting results that haven't received much focus isn't world changing.

It is. Quantity has quality of its own. Even if LLM peak below humans, a stupider brain that is inexhaustible, can work 24/7 and can be scaled to infinity means that a lot of intellectual things could be bruteforced in the million monkeys with million typewriters way. Throw at a million small problems and there will be breakthrough somewhere.

I usually buy some with clean design from Temu/Aliexpress that cost 30$, have really clean design and have lots of their movement exposed. A good skeleton watch is mesmerizing.