This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Indepedent of the race split, we would also get a huge gender split which I find interesting. (And would we possibly get an overrepresentation of nonbinary individuals?)
Let's assume a complete meritocracy based on SAT scores. According to this, the admitted students in Yale have an average SAT score of 1540. Since we disregard anything else now though, it will probably be even higher. However, at the 1400–1600 SAT range we already have 6% women and 9% men. Since we know the tail end of the IQ distribution is longer for men, and 1540 is almost in the upper quartile of 1400 to 1600, we would probably get a distribution of less than 30% women.
As a side note, according to this the average SAT of someone putting "Another/ No Response" as gender is 1067 in comparison to 1029 for men and 1018 for women. Huh, I wonder why that is. Few explanations that come to my mind are politically correct.
We can conclude that there are a lot of white and Asian men who are not getting the academic degrees they would get in a meritocracy. Then the question becomes where do these men end up and how to invest in these sectors. Typically high status low paying jobs such as author, human rights lawyer, journalist, professor etc are being ethnically cleansed of white men while other elite institutions are having an under representation of white men. These men are probably not all giving up on life just because they didn't get into Yale.
My guess is that many of them go into professions with higher pay but lower status, skilled trades, HVAC, property and construction (all roles), B2B sales, corporate roles at medium to large companies that aren’t Fortune 500s with woke hiring programs, many go into tech.
Trades pay gets massively exaggerated- we get teacher money for the most part, except the guys who work 100 hour weeks.
That being said, teachers definitely make a living wage, and ‘living wage, plus dating opportunities with dumber than you women, plus the ability to live in a shitty neighborhood with no problems’ is an appealing pitch for more men than women by a long shot.
?
An artifact of the audience, to live in a clean well ordered suburb in a southern or midwestern city is considered "shitty" by most of of the users here because it is naturally "lower status" than living in a condo in New York or LA. That the latter is far more likely encounter litteral shit/feces on the sidewalk than the former is just a fun bit of irony.
The difference between a "shitty" nieghborhood, and a shit nieghborhood.
I recall reading the observation on this forum and on Reddit that such suburban living combines all the disadvantages of urban and rural living. Maybe that’s what these users have in mind? The lack of walkable neighborhoods and third places, your neighbors being boorish and boring etc?
This is anti-rural slander / urbanist propaganda.
Our neighborhood is walkable, there's not really anywhere to walk to except nature trails and neighbors houses. There is a pub and two churches that many would consider their third places.
Wildlife is great too. https://imgur.com/a/bTanUVX
What about supermarkets? Gyms? Barbers?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link