This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
For what it’s worth, I do agree with this very specific point.
Unrelatedly, in the interests of not making another Minneapolis thread for a potentially uninteresting side issue: What do we make of the fact that this guy has a Filipina wife? The demographic replacement is coming from inside the house.
All countries are different. Within the Philippines there are even significant regional differences in culture and religeon. I've spent time for work in Manilla and Cebu and most of the people I met there seemed like genuinely good folks and were I not already hapily married could easily see enjoying a relationship with a Tagalog or Visaya for many of the reasons mentioned in this thread. I doubt I'd say this about many of the other places I've been for work like Singapore, Malaysia, or especially India. There's just something different. Maybe it b/c I was raised Catholic.
edit - banana ketchup is gross
More options
Context Copy link
I don't know how long they've been together so this might predate the current moment in dating, but showing conservative politics/any sort of a job like policing on a dating app is incredibly poisonous to your rate of matching.
Also having personally gotten out of the Dating App Mines a few years ago with a WMAF pairing, simply holding the following standards
Meant that my dating menu was like 85% Asian in a country that's like 10% Asian on the top level. That's gonna encourage guys of his profile to end up with Asian women.
More options
Context Copy link
Good for him. Reports are that she’s a US citizen.
Naturally, the side of Empathy, antiracism, antimisogyny, and free love has taken to sneering at her and calling her a mail-order bride.
Nor does the side who keeps wailing about Empathy for Renee being a mother give the slightest fuck about Jonathan being a father.
Hillary Clinton in the 2028 Democratic Primary debates: “White women have always been the primary victims of ICE.”
From the perspective of leftist middle-aged white women it’s like immigration policy anarchotyranny.
Anarchy: These stupid, toxic white men bring over their stupid age-gapped mail-order brides and make the world worse with their stupid, toxic children.
Tyranny: If you play games as a LARPing revolutionary on behalf of black and brown bodies you may win stupid prizes, when this were not supposed to happen.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Do you have some links for this one in particular? Any source will do.
With a cursory search one can find such links. For example, one of the first Reddit results:
More options
Context Copy link
A Xitter user with 43k followers explicitly describing Ross's wife as a mail-order bride. Heart-reacted 92k times, retweeted 15k times.
Richard Hanania mocking him for having an immigrant wife while thinking immigrants are a threat to America (refusing to parse the legal/illegal immigrant distinction, of course).
Richard Hanania asserting that Ross married a brown woman and then decided to devote his life to terrorising brown people (my God, do I loathe the term "people of colour", as if a Filipina has anything in common with a Somalian other than not being white).
Someone on Instagram comparing Ross's wife to the sexually exploited women she met while working as a missionary.
A Xitter user claiming that Ross married his Filipina wife specifically because the Philippines is the only country in the world which doesn't recognise divorce, thereby enslaving her.
If ICE was only deporting illegals, that would be true. But it doesn't seem to be the case. They are seen terrorizing not only legal immigrants but also US citizens. They even shot an innocent lady in Minnesota and decided to cover it up.
Besides Obama deported more illegals for a fraction of the cost. Where is the money going? Probably in terrorizing “brown people”, so that terrorizing part must be more by volume that ICE legal activities.
No US citizens had been deported by ICE. As for "terrorizing", this is not a factual statement. It could of course happen that ICE briefly detained a citizen - since it is impossible to recognize the citizen by just looking at them, it could take time to establish the citizenship, but I don't think you can name an example of ICE purposely targeting US citizen for deportation.
The rest of your statements are even less factual - what exactly is "terrorizing" that supposedly costs a lot of money? Of course, the reality is much simpler - to deport even a small part of 20 million of illegals, all over the US, while facing violent opposition and total obstruction to any law enforcement from the side of local authorities - takes significant time and human resources. Humans insist on being paid for spending time working, especially when their work is hard and involves significant risk of being violently attacked. That costs money. Processing the illegals targeted for deportation in accordance with the procedure costs money. Leftist activists ensure it costs as much as possible and takes as long as possible. Mystery solved.
Exactly those things that are currently happening are terrorising. Shooting an innocent woman, stopping vehicles for no reason, arresting a US citizen in underwear in cold weather, registering observers as domestic terrorists... Should I go on?
And not taking any responsibility whatsoever is the worst part. Yes, everybody can make mistakes. Own them. Instead of gaslighting, like in that example “we were looking for a dangerous criminal” who was actually already in the prison.
Catching dangerous criminals including illegal immigrants sometimes is hard but I don't see armed men regularly patrolling the streets in cities to do that. Probably because such demonstration of force is not useful. It is just a waste of good money.
And let's not start with double legal standards where the US authorities are unable to process green card applications in time thus leaving people in limbo. Technically they are illegal and yet one agency will accept their status and the other will send armed men after them. It has no consistency and indicates a dysfunctional country. Obviously, the US is very rich and will never be called dysfunctional but in certain aspects it really is. It is not all or nothing proposal.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Strange this one false stat keeps coming up recently.
Obama counted turning people away at the border as deportations to falsely inflate his numbers. He didn't actually deport them.
Changing the definition of something to make it much broader results in a sudden huge spike, despite no change in reality. But that's a politician playing dishonest games with definitions, not good policy.
And do you think Trump administration would not include those people turned away in their numbers?
But assume you are right. So, instead of spending money trying to deport illegals, you could just not let them in, for a fraction of cost?
Or maybe actually illegal immigrants in the US are net positive financially and not letting them in is not good for the economy?
What is the best policy?
You have to do both, obviously. Preventing people from committing crimes is good. Finding people who have committed crimes is also good.
I always find that if the country has a lot of illegal immigrants, it is always due to deliberate policy of that country.
The USSR had very little illegal immigration or emigration despite a lot of land and sea border. We could laugh about Trump building the wall (that was just an attempt of embezzlement), but if the country is serious, it can guard the border quite well.
The EU has a polity allowing a lot of refugees (in reality economic immigrants) in. It might be a bad policy but most likely dictated by desperate measures to counteract low birth rates. It is all deliberate and the EU has very little undesirable illegal immigrants. They find difficult to get jobs and receive services. Most so called illegals are requesting asylum and in most cases they receive it. Only small part of applicants are refused and deported.
The US is most likely the same situation. Most “illegals” are welcomed but the US does not control illegal employment as strictly as in the EU. That is deliberate as those immigrants have no rights and will work for low wages.
From human rights position that is fundamentally wrong. It is like slavery just with more steps. Now promises to deport them sound good from legal point of view, but expect a lot of protest from businesses who are using their labour.
The correct position would be to legalize most of those workers instead of deporting them. But I don't see democrats, nor republicans being interested in this solution.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I'm surprised you find that strange. Deceptive stats that make democrats look better than republicans are incredibly popular with the democrat-aligned media.
Yes, but I've seen that fake stat here at least twice in the past day. It's a bit odd for credulous recitations of Democratic aligned media talking points to be common here.
Of course I wouldn't think it strange if I kept seeing it on Reddit. Maybe we got new users trained on Reddit-style talking points and they're contributing much to this thread.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Are we talking about the same woman? Because her "innocence" is exactly what's under discussion, and I can't say it's been effectively "covered up" if literally everyone is talking about it.
ICE is not talking about it, in fact, they are actively denying it, blocking investigation and spreading lies.
And Trump, vice-president and other politicians are gaslighting about that.
How is releasing footage of the incident that the assailant filmed on his phone "covering it up"?
It didn't provide any new info therefore it was done for gasligting knowing that bunch of retarded people will see that recording as supporting their views.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
He didn't. He just lied about it.
I block gaslighters. Nothing personal
I don't know what to tell you, border turnarounds aren't deportations, and pretending that they are is lying.
Or are you saying you've blocked Obama?
Just stop replying. You are making it worse.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Demand for white supremacists far outstrips the supply.
More options
Context Copy link
It's a clue that this whole thing about deporting immigrants who don't obey immigration laws is not about racism, as alleged, but rather about ensuring that immigrants obey immigration laws.
More options
Context Copy link
Asian Aryanism, clearly. He must be a fan of Safe Sleazy.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link