site banner
PaperclipPerfector  4d ago (text post)   15481 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of May 11, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You know I always just assumed the vast majority of dog beastiality was like receptive oral where the human smears peanut butter on their genetalia or the dog is the receptive one either vaginally or anally.

I suppose training an adolescent dog to be the one penetrating is possible but it seems extremely difficult; aren’t dog members not nearly as stiff as humans? I don’t know how much anal sex you’ve had but it’s an “out” hole and it fights back more than a bit when compared to a vagina, unless it’s been really “trained up” so to speak.

Someone up thread described this as essentially a blood libel and it seems more likely; dogs are a very specific Arab / Muslim taboo so it smells like a maximally offensive myth made specifically to inflame an already maximally uncharitable audience primed to believe basically anything.

To my mind it reminds me of the 19th century Indian revolt against the British Empire. One of the precursors was a rumor spread amongst Indians serving as auxiliaries that the rifle cartridges were stored in beef fat. And crucially for my point, they told the Muslims that they were stored in pork fat. Never let the truth get in the way of a good story, eh?

Plus, if you wanted to sexually brutalize prisoners there’s a lot easier ways to do it. We got a ton of examples of this.

Ironically this reminds me a bit of that old /pol/ bit about holocaust survivors talking about nazis freezing Jews with dry ice and putting them on mine carts so that they smash into a million pieces looney toons style. Way too baroque to be true but the ones spinning the yarn are given maximum charity due to their “victim” status.

The “Dogs raping prisoners” schtick is a double blood libel as well as it’s a pretty standard lefty canard against any unfavorable regime; I believe the same accusations were leveled against Pinochet, Franco, the Greek Military Junta, etc, etc. usually the CIA is invoked, as is tradition.

A final point; this to me is also illustrative of how certain sexual topics that are politically explosive are difficult to discuss because people are understandably reluctant to engage with the mechanics of the subject. I think for example the backlash against LGBQT ideology only could grow because increasing numbers of people were willing to frankly describe, outside of the gatekeepers eye, the physical acts being performed routinely in great detail. The rest followed.

frankly describe, outside of the gatekeepers eye, the physical acts being performed routinely in great detail

Oral and anal sex? Non-monogamy? I know they do that. "They" being a portion of gay men. You got something more scandalous?

”Quantity has a quality all its own.”

Very few people are scandalized by anal sex nowadays, it’s the fact that the average gay men has an astronomical amount of sexual partners compared to heterosexual men, and the most sexually active 10% of the population are essentially the male version of Bonnie Blue.

This combined with the prevalence of PreP usage, which is shockingly high to the average heterosexual, are the things that as they become common knowledge dismantle a lot of the “shucks, they’re just like us” line that the 90s and the 2000s cultural era built up so carefully.

In urban settings you can get a blowjob off of grindr faster than you can get a goddamn pizza delivered.

In the 90s and 2000s politically active homophobia used to be basically just the province of right wing religious types, that ship has sailed as we learn a lot more things than we wanted to know about each other via social media. Now it’s increasingly normal for secular people to be disgusted by this sexual culture, even if they keep it to themselves in public.

The whole monkey pox episode was a microcosm of this, once it seemed obvious it was sexual transmitted and certain people couldn’t stop sucking and fucking bareback at an extraordinary rate in order to actually combat the outbreak, it was dropped as a story. But people noticed, and remembered.

My favorite line about hyper partisanship in the social media age when magical “algorithms” are brought to be the ritual scapegoat in the divided society, I simply say “No, we just know a lot more about each other because we volunteer what would have been private or semi-private information freely to huge audiences. Certain groups were encouraged and told no behavior from them can be shameful. So now we know much more about each other and have collectively decided we don’t like each other much.”

Or to put it another way “They’re not confessing, they’re bragging.

What physical acts, outside of the gatekeepers eye?

[cw: exactly what you think from the block quote]

I suppose training an adolescent dog to be the one penetrating is possible but it seems extremely difficult; aren’t dog members not nearly as stiff as humans?

Dogs, like most non-primate mammals, have an os penis bone. When fully aroused, the combination of bone and hydraulic pressure makes the penis very firm even compared to the typical human erection, though the root of the knot is flexible. Much of the complication comes because canine sexuality has some process difference such that full erection rarely happens before penetration.

((There's a lot of very life-like furry fandom sex toys and discussions and images out there. Actual zoosexuality is rare and Frowned On, to be blunt, but the line gets fuzzy when a major vendor sells lifecast toys. I'll avoid going into more detail for the sake of anyone wanting to keep down their dinner.))

That bone also makes them extremely vulnerable, as for a whole lot of complicated biomechanical reasons both the penis membrane/skin itself and the bone is very delicate.

I'm... aware enough of certain scandals to suspect that at least some dogs could be trained to mount a specific person without a massive level of other infrastructure, but I'm skeptical it could be done at the scale, organization, and direction claimed here. And then you need the motives on top of that.

I'm... aware enough of certain scandals

Colby 2012 #NeverForget

“Zoophilia: Much more than you wanted to know!”

... the awkward part is that there's probably a lot of untapped ground in an essay like that: since most writers either approach the topic from both moral and disgust opposition, or from the derpitarian position that ignores the moral issues by waving at the disgust reaction, actually engaging seriously with the moral ramifications while not being disgusted by the physical mechanics could be genuinely novel ground.

But by definition, it's the sort of story no one actually wants to read. Which probably answers is a bigger change to the "backlash against LGBQT ideology only could grow because increasing numbers of people were willing to frankly describe, outside of the gatekeepers eye, the physical acts being performed routinely in great detail".

I don't like that we're describing every accusation as a blood libel now. I'm not a fan of creeping woke rhetorical norms.

The doctor above objected that while they had seen cases of dogs anally penetrating humans, it was always consensual. This is an absurd assertion: the dog has no concept of consent.

I remain blissfully ignorant on the practicality of this entire episode.

Not every accusation against the IDF is a blood libel, but this one seems bang on.

It has all the right texture; It combines religious / social taboo with maximally inflammatory claims with little to no regard for practicality or realism. It relies on Jews having almost a cosmic quality of evil to them, it’s borderline magical thinking.

For a counter example; the accusation of the IDF blowing up that school in Iran. Not a blood libel, just a plain old accusation of atrocities. Textbook stuff, the same type of propaganda and counter propaganda you might see for example in the Irish war for Independence or the American Civil War. Much more mundane.

For a counter example; the accusation of the IDF blowing up that school in Iran. Not a blood libel, just a plain old accusation of atrocities.

And here's the Free Press:

It was unsettling to watch California governor Gavin Newsom on Monday spouting off a rejiggered blood libel this week, and not simply because Democrats have mostly succumbed to a fashionable Jew hate.

The term Blood Libel is used constantly in the Pro-Israel press to refer to anything that anyone accuses the Jews of having done wrong. Accusations of Antisemitism have become the new thought terminating cliche.

Yep! You’ll get no argument from me that it’s overused almost as much the antisemitic tropes it’s being leveled against. People do indeed use the word for cases that don’t fit.

However, the “IDF Training dogs to anally rape Muslims” is almost a platonic example of a modern blood libel. It’s basically a perfect case.

That’s my point.

Exactly. Commentary from Jews about anti-semitism is generally so tedious and hysterical, it feels like I am living in a world where NPR never gave up their ridiculous campaigns against "anti-AAPI hate."

Which is why it is so dismaying to me to see this obvious lie about dog rape published in the New York Times; for once I am unable to roll my eyes when Jews claim "blood libel."

"Lord, protect me from my friends sympathetic press; I can handle my enemies on my own."

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats