This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I think this is an interesting point, and it sounds to me like you are probably correct, but it raises a question: Why didn't Candace Owens just join the Left? As a reasonably attractive black woman, she surely could have gotten some kind of reasonably well paying public intellectual position. Or she could have stayed with the Daily Wire if she had just stayed silent about Israel. (As a side note, I strongly suspect that Matt Walsh has pretty strong negative feelings about Jews but is smart enough to keep his mouth shut.)
Her incomprehensible Gamergate origin story was that she had developed a service that would unmask sock puppet accounts, to fight harassment. Then Zoe Quinn anonymously contacted her, threatening her if she went forward with it. And this cemented in her world view that leftist were pro-harassment.
Even then she was obviously a retarded liar. There were no details as to how this sock puppet unmasking service worked, not even a whiff of a hint that she was remotely capable of creating such a service, or even outsourcing it to people who were. The utility of such a revolutionary technology has not diminished in the least, and yet it has still yet to materialize from her now that her grift has moved so far past anyone even remembering her fantastical origin story.
And yet, somehow, she has still managed to embed herself in the ecosystem of online right discourse. Frankly it's astonishing. She's like some sort of meat LLM that has gradually learned what mouth sounds to make to secure infinite attention, with little understanding of what any of those mouth sounds really mean.
More options
Context Copy link
She did, originally. The competition for black female influencers was too stiff, so she jumped ship.
The left wing grift industrial complex is large and well funded, but the barriers of entry are high. The right wing one is much more modest, but with less competition (at least a few years ago).
The meta right now seems to be go right at first to build up an audience, and then try to pivot left as a David Frenchian figure to secure the leftbuxx.
See also: Richard Hanania
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Well, there's plenty of demand on the right too for black women and less competition. Mainstream rightists are but progressives driving the speed limit, and are also desperate to have blacks and women as allies so they can say "see?! look! we're not racist/misogynists," not that their meek protests are effective. Lots of two-soyjaks-pointing at Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, and MLK too. Plus, the online right leans male and is not immune to simping whenever a reasonably attractive chick comes along (see the ecosystem of rightoid/TradCon e-thot grifters).
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link