Even if I agreed that the decision of large corporations to raceswap well known characters was only made for cynical reasons, isn't that too human?
Race based discrimination is also human, but I dislike it. Especially when it goes against myself.
And raceswaps done by large corporations are curiously oneway and match propaganda of my enemies (that positioned themself on their own). I am not interested in race based culture wars but I dislike surrendering even more, so if someone declared themself to be my enemy....
Reminds me about that law banning leaving trace amounts of sesame (?), even with warning on packaging. Intended to be help for people deathly allergic to it. Deliberate inclusion of sesame remained legal.
Resulting in producers starting to add sesame deliberately. Impacting people with allergy but capable of eating products that had just traces of it.
Worth noting that at this scale many things happened. And it is hard to distinguish between "something unique happened single time and we have proof of it" and "something is happening routinely, intentionally and ordered".
There is difference between "single specific soldier was summarily executed for disobeying orders" and "anyone who retreats is executed", with wide variety of stuff between.
The same goes for many different things.
The repair stuff could make sense if they are liable for something like catastrophic failures
this contract was intentionally constructed to decouple servicing overhaul and train construction, with manufacturer obligated to provide full servicing documentation
they lied, sabotaged train and tried to sabotage companies competing for servicing overhaul tender
they were caught by hackers hired by one such sabotaged company (with first hard proof delivered 43 minutes before servicing contract would be broken by train company)
Newag continues to lie and try to blame others.
but it could also be at least partially a mistake or ineptitude on the part of Newag
Yes, and there are indicators of this. But none of them reduce that all this is nefarious and hopefully illegal.
Trains were programmed to falsely report being broken down after specific date, or after specific number of mileage or after being repaired at repair yards run by competition.
This was not documented, Newag lied about it when asked and continues to lie.
Newag was nefariously sabotaging competition.
There is overwhelming evidence that aliens are here observing Earth, and have been for some time.
No, it is not overwhelming.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
What if anything do you make of the fact that we are not alone in the universe, much less alone on this planet?
First is likely true but of limited practicality as we are unlikely to ever interact, for second we have no strong evidence for that.
We have evidence that they observed UFOs. This is entirely normal as in "it is normal to fail to identify some flying objects". But software bug, visual artefact, commercial plane are all more likely than literal aliens. Widespread conspiracy is more likely than aliens.
Show me investigation(s) by say USA, China, Germany, Russia (feel free to switch Germany to UK, France or something, and Russia for Iran or similar) and then I will treat it seriously. Or at least official announcement by USA president about aliens, not mumbling by some faction. Then I can treat it seriously.
Are you aware that Kurt's content is curated by Kurt's and material unflattering to Kurt will be not shown?
Why you think that you can draw any strong conclusions from such biased sample?
Was the life you had in Venezuela really that much worse than sitting on the frozen streets of a foreign country begging for money?
(...)
(Despite claiming she has not been able to find enough food to eat, it is clear that few of these people have been running much of a calorie deficit)
Sounds like answer is yes.
than admit that free and easy abortion serves the public interest.
People believing that abortions and evil and murder are opposing it, more news at 11.
I guess what I'm asking is: where the liberals at? Or alternatively, why has the proportion of racists increased dramatically since moving off Reddit?
I may kind of qualify?
While I appear on themotte: I have limited amount of time that I can spend on "someone is wrong on the internet".
And there is only so much that I will spend on arguing with handle abbreviated to SS about holocaust denial. It can be sort of interesting but only in low doses. (the same goes for other witchy topics)
Many other topics seems to be equally witchy in noninteresting way, where I have no competence or interest or are extremely USA-specific in a boring way.
And when something is on topic, it is often of so low quality that it is eyerolling.
The idea is that the IRS is so small and incompetent that they basically won't do anything against this sort of passive resistance.
Author wrote about it also on https://sniggle.net/TPL/index5.php?entry=19Mar23
And this indicates that you need to restructure your life, give up passport, lower income AND hope that IRS will stay incompetent and will not use its power to seize what you owe. And maybe also put into prison.
This is terrible idea, as expected.
The total amount I owe at this point is well over the threshold at which the IRS is supposed to notify the State Department that I ought to be forbidden a passport and perhaps ought to have my passport revoked. It took the agency longer than I expected, but they eventually submitted this notification a few years back.♦ This means that the State Department could revoke my passport at any time, and in any case is not supposed to allow me to renew it when it expires. So far they have not revoked my passport.
BTW, given "Last year, when another year of my tax debt became uncollectible due to the statute of limitations" it seems that IRS funding really should be increased.
and they changed nothing
It made multiculturalism less attractive for people elsewhere. It is a common talking point in Poland, with no good counter.
What are the effects of this open borders system?
Who enforces it? aliens? Because I expected it to be modified basically immediately, as the first effect.
Palestinian migrants were also major contributor to Lebanon civil war and its current state.
(3) Most of these other things (railroad stations, parks, apartment buildings) are not worth building beautifully because public administration is unwilling and/or unable to patrol and enforce order in public spaces, and the populace does not recognize public order as a goal worth pursuing and personally-enacting. If everything is just going to be defaced and graffiti'ed and have drug addicts sleeping and shitting on it, what's the point?
That does not explain why European railway/bus stations are also ugly
No one in history really conceived of a level of self-control that would permit you to be alone with an attractive young woman for an extended period of time.
This is complete bullshit. While "The most well-trained monk was still barred from being alone with a nun." type of rules exist because people designing such institution have seen fit to avoid obvious temptations, this temptations can be in fact resisted.
you can no longer accuse a man of rape if you willingly spend time with him alone
Are you serious? This rule as you propose is blatantly idiotic, starting from fact that fathers occasionally have daughters.
But yes, also in cases you likely intended: yes, you can stay with attractive girl, alone, and do not rape her. I have honestly no idea why you think it is impossible.
once there's a good design.
this is a quite significant thing to assume to exist soon
This contract was intentionally constructed to decouple servicing overhaul and train construction, with manufacturer obligated to provide full servicing documentation.
Repairs done at repair yards of competition were NOT illicit, Newag lost bid for overhaul.
You don't tear down other people's posters
I do it routinely with illegally placed ads. (if not easy to remove, I notify local government so they remove it)
I also did it with propaganda stickers.
(note, I am from Poland)
(bonus note: be careful, there are reports of razors being glued below stickers, more likely to happen with aggressive propaganda than ads)
What I remember is that Americans have the power to bury the killing of their countrymen when politically advantageous. And that sovereign is he who makes the exception.
Well, yes? And Poland has not declared war on Ukraine when their anti-air missile killed people in Poland (Przewodów).
Context matters and acting like AI from computer game is not optimal in real world. Large part of being sovereign is being sovereign and not behold to simplistic suboptimal rules.
Note also how Israel responded.
Including the big one, the master of the lists, Oryx.
Oryx gave announcement months in advance and alternative maintainers were found.
Except that hobbyist will not destroy his life work in a fit of pique.
It happened many times with exposure-focused hobbyists. Especially with writers.
Also, Oryx website is up last time I checked, they terminated only dead bird account and started doing other stuff.
Then, one day, they die suddenly and any autopsy performed with reveal superfluous amounts of visceral fat, a leaking stomach, and a liver close to non-function.
On what you base this prediction?
I would be satisfied with responsible people being hit by large fines and maybe spending some time in prison (though not expecting this).
UN
UN actually succeeding at something would be the most surprising part here.
I would rather blame Facebook and Twitter and Tik Tok.
Why does Ukraine fighting Russia advance European interests? It hurts European interests, Russia is Europe's natural energy supplier.
Because Russia is stupid and instead extracting piles of money from being energy supplier they decided to wage short victorious war.
Because ruling class and society in general there was unable to accept its loss of superpower status.
For other European countries it is preferable for this adventure to go badly for Russia so they will not try it with NATO countries next time.
The mainstream argument seems to be 'Europe needs to produce more weapons to give to Ukraine so they can fight Russia'. But why?
Because otherwise Russia will invade, it it can get away with it or thinks it can get away with it?
Why is NATO so obsessed with the 2% of GDP figure?
Coordination tool.
But for those of us who live in the real world where Ukraine is much weaker than the entirety of Europe, it stands to reason that Europe can defend itself from Russia.
Assuming no coordination issues.
This is a big assumption.
despite also being a pale shadow of its former glory and losing Putin's idiotic war in Ukraine
Maybe I missed something, but if anyone is losing this war right now it is Ukraine (it was still idiotic war and bad for Russia)
- Prev
- Next
Edited my comment a bit to clarify that deliberate addition remained legal.
What else they could do?
More options
Context Copy link