This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Congratulations United States, you are Pope!
Edit: Sorry if that is too short but I am currently watching the livestream from Europe and am totally baffled.
More information on Prevost available here: https://collegeofcardinalsreport.com/cardinals/robert-francis-prevost/
Dude wasn't even a cardinal 2 years ago and is now Pope...
If this is the stuff we know of, he's got enough skeletons in the closet to be very reliable indeed.
Primer on how it works in the church for those who aren't catholic. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccarrick-catholic-church-how-the-lavender-mafia-works/
The few Italian catholics who I'm following on twitter are seething.
Italians seethe and cope
More options
Context Copy link
Gosh, somebody piped up to accuse him of mishandling sexual abuse allegations. I'm so surprised - not. There's a lot of people making a tidy living from being professional agitators about this, usually with an accompanying laundry list of "we demand zillions in payouts/also the Church must totally change every single bit of doctrine so the stuff we like isn't a sin and it becomes just like a mainline liberal Protestant denomination".
When there's real grievances, I'll listen. When it's "fifteen or so years ago, somebody said that there was something happened" not so much, because while there has been genuine horrific abuse, there has also been ambulance chasing lawyers and people looking to make hay out of it. "Oh did you know X is bad because whisper whisper?" Funny how these allegations all immediately popped up after the announcement but not in the days beforehand?
Your Italians are seething because an Italian didn't get selected.
Said Italians were hoping for Erdo.
Unfortunately, their Erdo’s number wasn’t sufficient
This is what necropapers are for.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Italy was Erdo’s weakest point in Europe, though.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
His mishandling abuse cases were known to Vatican watchers well ahead of time and probably the reason he didn’t make many lists of papabile. You’re suddenly hearing about them because he suddenly became pope.
Apparently well known to the Vatican which investigated them and found nothing there. As to "Vatican watchers", I wish my fellow conservatives would stop looking for "the smoke of Satan, he's a liberal! he'll ban the Latin Mass for good and all! he'll force us all to allow married women priests and excommunicate us and burn us at the stake!" every time anyone who is not Archbishop Lefebvre is in the news. Some of them seem to yearn to be persecuted, as though the challenges of living the faith in the modern world were not enough. No, I'm not just cosplaying the old rites as part of a miniscule element of the universal Church, I'm so important that the College of Cardinals needs to oppress me specifically by who they elect as the new pope!
Do you think I liked the sweeping changes that threw the baby out with the bathwater? Do I approve of the lack of catechesis which means the vast majority of modern Catholics are more ignorant than the unchurched of their own faith? Was I happy with everything Francis did?
No, but he was the pope. And now Leo XIV is the pope, and I am not going to waste time and energy hoping for a "ah yes, the lavender mafia, he's secretly a flaming gay being blackmailed by them to cover up abuse scandals" Real True Truth revelation to blacken his name (particularly when one of those scandals seem to be heterosexual not homosexual).
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
A surprisingly large percentage of the population lives within shouting distance of an elementary school. Is the Catholic Church supposed to lock people in jail?
More options
Context Copy link
The local prior, not the prior provincial (Prevost), accepted the request of the Archdiocese of Chicago.
I would say the stuff that happened in the Diocese of Chiclayo is stronger evidence of poor responses to sexual abuse.
Yeah. Often what happened with accused priests was that before they were officially defrocked, they were sent to live in a religious community where they could be monitored. This particular one happened to be in range of a school. Not the best choice, but choices are going to be limited about "we need to send this guy somewhere and there aren't a lot of places we can do that".
If I'm getting it right, the accused priest wasn't an Augustinian, so probably one of the secular clergy in the diocese. Doubtless the facts will come out in time, but the damage has already been done.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link