This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The online discourse, I've been watching this week is the $20 Burrito. As a super TLDR; this is an intra-right argument that got started by one conservative saying young conservatives are upset about food affordability, and gave an offhand example about '$20 burritos'. The response was a combination of:
Burritos aren't actually that unaffordable, the rate of increase in unaffordability has come down, also you can make them at home for cheaper, also you aren't entitled to eating out.
The response to the response is that this is a losing message to one's own side, avoids accountability for losing focus on why 2024 went Trump, and suspiciously aligned to Iran war support.
Before I address that specifically, a little about my personal burrito.
I am as close to a controlled middleclass experiment as possible.
I live in the same zipcode I grew up in; my kids go to the same Catholic school I went to. I work in the same industry as my father. I aspire to give my family the same life I grew up with. I can't live the life my parents lived.
In the 90s my parents moved us into a new construction. Today, I live in smaller a house, on a smaller lot built in the mid-70s. In realtive terms, I live in a house that is not only smaller, but nearly 50 years older than the one my father did.
My parents had >8 kids. I have 5.
Here's the kicker: My father was an individual contributor, software developer. I am a Director-level at a mid-market software company; This isn't title inflation, I manage an org of about 25, including multiple layers of leadership.
While being considerably more successful than my father in my career, I financially struggle to same life he lived.
I don't disagree with any of the above points, or probably other reasonable ones, but they all miss the point: I want to live the life I grew up in, I am willing to work hard for it, I held up my part of the implied social contract, I think that the failure of the implied social contract is a BAD thing, something to be seen as regrettable, and I want my politicians to focus on fixing it.
Burritos aren't actually that unaffordable, the rate of increase in unaffordability has come down, also you can make them at home for cheaper, also you aren't entitled to eating out.
This is all arguably true. But yet, is a losing message. Especially when your side won on addressing the real and percieved reasons we can't get affordable burritos, and super especially when the other side's solution is 'free burritos for our friends, mass immigration for our enemies'
The US middle class opportunity has changed in negatives ways for reasons that don't benefit me, and I didn't ask for, and instead of my political side agreeing to help address these issues, they are telling me to support a foreign war
I've been to expensive and gucci places and I think it completely loco to pay $20 for a burrito. If a restaurant tries to charge that much, literally walk out and go somewhere else. It's true though that restaurants in general have gotten more expensive though, but I think it's probably a structural shift in the labor market as well as the attitudes of young people getting food and ordering delivery. If there are suckers out there who will pay $30 for delivery of a shitty meal, then someone out there will charge that much.
In my personal IME groceries are up slightly but not enough that I really notice.
I think a major issue is that some specific things that people really enjoy have surged massively in price, sometimes in ways that aren't reflected in inflation.
For example ground beef where I live is effectively up more than 100% since 2020 both due to price increases and the almost complete lack of meaningful sales. If you're price conscious and your usual diet consists a lot of ground beef this will feel outrageous.
I've replaced almost all of our (unground) beef intake with chuck roast. Slice it thin (and maybe pound it a little) and I think it's better than flank steak for fajitas. Else I just cube it and braise it. Couple hours of that and it's so delicious and tender. Plus you're getting a lot of nutrition and flavor out of the connective tissue that's converted to collagen. Hoping nobody else figures this out. Also, typically about half the roast is suitable for cutting into steaks and cooking normally, whereas only the other half is something you wouldn't want to cook that way.
Real steaks, like ribeye, have become exorbitantly expensive, but I've found that in almost all cases I like lamb shoulder chops better anyway and they're less than half the price per pound. My go-to is to marinate them in a little bit of very high-end soy sauce and rice vinegar.
Cannot for the life of me figure out why filet """mignon""" (it almost never is) is so expensive. Worst cut of meat on the cow IMO unless you're doing something very specific with it, but people go nuts and I sincerely think it's because "mignon" sounds fancy.
I feel like people realised that here long ago. When I can get flank steak for almost the same price then why bother?
Here the chuck roast I'm buying is $10.99/pound whereas the flank steak is usually more like $27.
But most people probably aren't feeding a wife who insists that every piece of meat be organic, pasture-raised, and from an animal with an endowment set up such that buddhist monks will be praying for them in perpetuity; etc.
Are whole cows available in the bay area? You might be better off buying a whole/half a cow directly from a rancher and getting it processed to eat over time.
Yes, that's definitely been something we plan to look into, and I'm not sure why we haven't gotten around to it yet. The economics make perfect sense and I'm more than happy to use all the weird cuts that would come along with it. Probably I should put Claude on the case.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Highest price = highest quality! O_O
It's a known phenomenon from marketing psychology. Sometimes if you increase the price of something to an absurd amount, you'll get more units sold.
One of my favorite books is 'How to Blacksmith'. It starts from absolute zero principles - that you have nothing and educates you on how to get into said topic.
The very foreword starts off with 'If you're thinking to get into this to make money as a side project, don't. You will not. Do not do this. You will end up disappointed and frustrated.'
It's not until the very last chapter that he basically says 'If you're determined to try and make money off of this, these are my experiences.' And one illustrative example he gives is 'If you're not able to sell a product, the first thing you should so is increase the price.'
And yet, despite all of this, I find alot of sales people I've interacted with seem incapable of grasping this.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link