Cause otherwise midterms discussion will be scattered around a bunch of separate Culture War thread posts. And it's nice to have more off-the-cuff rapid reactions in a dedicated megathread.
The first thing I've noticed so far: if the exit polls are correct, Americans are very pessimistic about AI.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
How's that supposed to work? The only reason he's an "albatross" is he listened to the neocons and went all in on Iran. Would any of the non-Trumpian Republicans avoid that?
Even George W. Bush didn't go in on Iran. Listening to the neocons is one thing but if you only listen to them and Tel Aviv and not the rest of the military or intelligence apparatus...
Not for lack of desire. He had his hands full with 2 other full scale occupations.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
We're gonna have to find a way, because it looks to me like the Trump Train is about as dead as it can possibly be. There's bitter choices available on the best path forward, especially since Progressives are pushing all the various closure methods available to them and there's probably no path forward that avoids them all, but Trump at this point appears to be a fatal liability. He's never going to admit fault or error either, and will probably sabotage any attempts to route around him.
He fucked us, and he fucked is in the stupidest, most easily avoidable, least justifiable, most stereotypically awful way possible.
Sit down for a moment, think about how fucked the political situation is in America and how difficult and expensive it would be to fix, and then ponder the amount of Republican political capital we've lost to wars in the middle east. It's a fucking Greek tragedy.
It made some strategic sense to be militarily involved in the middle east, if only to secure oil. Since the shale oil revolution and wind/solar/nuclear energy advances, it makes almost no sense since we are or can be a net oil/energy producer. We should import cheap oil if we can, but if we can't then just turn on the shale faucets and let the middle east be someone else's problem.
The unfortunate thing is that I honestly get it- you have one remaining country in the Near East before you have a complete system of alliances subordinate to the US (and hence, a complete system of oil-producing nations that can be instructed not to sell to China or to the EU- something that was already done with Venezuela and [what is currently being done to] Canada, and something I don't see reversing under Blue rule either).
One notes that, in case of war with a particular strategically vital American ally in the South China Sea with an enemy that can outproduce your own forces, that it would be in one's military interest if you can Thanos-snap away all the fuel they'd use to get there. Doesn't matter how many engines you build if you can't run them (a military that depends on batteries is not practical- energy density and refueling speed are still way too slow for that).
Russia isn't ready to supply a Chinese expedition to Taiwan yet, won't be for some time, and thanks to the Ukrainian war (that the US intentionally provoked, mind you) will be in a much better position to defend against potential Chinese aggression on its eastern border if the Chinese decide they'll do it themselves (provided the Russians actually bother to invest in manufacturing the newest smart mortar systems [that is, drones] completely outside the Chinese supply chain). The PLA hasn't fought a hot war in 40 years.
But it needed to have been one thing at a time. Either sacrifice the economy of Northern states until Southern Ontario turfs the Federal government entirely in favor of Anschluss (or are rendered so economically irrelevant there's no need and you can just impose terms that way), or destroy Iran. The US is very powerful, but it is not '90s powerful, and I can absolutely believe Trump is hindered by a mindset that hasn't updated beyond the '90s.
For many people, you have your mindset locked in during middle age (or even younger) and that's what you carry with you into your old age. We beat the crap out of Iraq in 1990, and then after deposing Maduro in Venezuela it seemed like we were just as strong as we were back then, but with even better fighter jets and other military tech. With Iran, it was probably easy to believe that their regime was shaky and just needed one strong kick for it to all come crumbling down.
And honestly, I don't even think trying that is bad. If the first two are layups, seems reasonable to try for a third.
Yet, if it was stronger, now you're stuck in the Soviet Union that is still somehow managing to supply itself while needing to fight on 3 other fronts at the same time. Which, well...
Which is how you end up with "firm handshake economy and self-flagellate for being co-generational with the last of the old-style racists" Boomers. Trump is 80, but his advisors sure aren't.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Yeah, I hear you. My issue is with the "Republican senators would be delighted to get rid of him" framing, would these guys fuck you any less? My impression was that the whole point of getting Trump into power was to get rid if them.
There's a glimmer of hope in the form of panicked noises about "groyper" staffers, but by the time these guys advance through the ranks, Trump is not going to be factor anyway.
Which makes it extra frustrating when he burns everything we gave him to give them the one thing they could never get, in a way where the only plausible further put them more firmly between us and power than they were before.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link