Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 140
- 3
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Which is the most morally correct Inquisitor?
A bit of an odd/dumb thought experiment. Let us presuppose the following. You are in the 40k universe, and through the vagaries of fate have become a member of the Holy Ordos of His Majesty's Imperial Inquisition. You have the rosette, and with that rosette comes the authority to order the death of an entire world, and to consign a billion souls to oblivion. For the purposes of our thought experiment you are a true believer in the Imperium. It is the best, last hope for mankind and your job, your only job, is to push back the dying of the light by a decade, a year, a week, even just a day. To hold the line against the witch, the heretic, and the alien.
But which one is the most morally consistent with your internal value system as a man or woman who wholeheartedly supports the Imperium? The Ordo Xenos, Malleus, or Hereticus? Yes I'm aware that there are innumerable minor ordos, but work with me here and don't say "actually it's the Ordo Cronos." Does pursuit of the witch, the heretic, or the alien provide the greatest opportunity for pushing back the decay that besets the Imperium? There are of course excellent arguments for any of the options. The Alien is the most obvious threat. Unsubtle, overpowering, and always nibbling at the edges of Imperial space. The Tyranid breed xenos is an existential threat, and left unchecked it will consume the galaxy. But there are also countless other xenos threats, ranging from the major (Orks), to the relatively minor (Hrud). On the other hand, the heretic gnaws away at the fabric of the Imperium. Left unchecked they will fester and explode into rebellion, resulting in the deaths of millions or billions, and the diversion of hard-pressed Imperial resources away from the borders of Imperial space. On the third hand (insert genestealer joke here), the witch is the hardest to find and fight, while potentially representing the worst possible outcome. Too many witches go unchecked, and you risk letting a warp storm open in Imperial space, dragging countless human souls into literal hell where they will be murder/rape/tortured for eternity. Better to be eaten by Tyranids than dragged into the warp no?
I deliberately put this in the fun thread because I don't have a great answer, mostly because I can see the valid arguments for any of the above. Also because it's a silly thought experiment. But I'm curious as to what those mottizens who are familiar with the 40k universe think. Or if you're not familiar with the 40k universe, if anything jumps out as you as an obvious answer.
Heretics seem to be the primary danger to the Imperium. The Tyranids and other xenos didn't do nearly so much damage as the Black Crusades did, opening up a giant rift in the galaxy, cutting the Imperium in two. In previous Black Crusades the Imperium had to drop everything and head off to Cadia to avoid disaster.
It's not just rebellion but subversion in support of Chaos and their armies, often synchronized into a coordinated plan that is the issue. Chaos is the primary danger, so I would favour Hereticus, Malleus Demonhunters and then Xenos.
More options
Context Copy link
One ordo or the other aren't going to be more morally "correct" from the reader's perspective, that's down to individual inquisitors and the type of story being told. Eisenhorn is Ordo Xenos (and barely hunts any aliens). Gideon Ravenor is probably the most sane/sentimental/human inquisitor.
More options
Context Copy link
Not versed in the lore enough, but Warhammer 40k ambient music comes up in my feed a lot and I love it. Some of it sounds more spiritual than common church music today, at least to me.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=MY2eOrxYxiI
The comments are usually filled with pseudo-Christian maxims, too. That’s part of the lore I assume. But I read the comments and I think about how they’re all just one or two quick modifications away from medieval or antique Christianity.
That last one is a person having a genuine religious experience. He is experiencing the sublime from a Warhammer 40k ambient music video on YouTube that may have been made by a 16 year old, and several thousand people find his experience agreeable. I watch this and I think: why don’t these guys just do religion? It would be better if they were engaging in living religion even as a larp than wasting these efforts on an expensive consumerist activity that doesn’t promote as much cooperation and social trust and connections etc. Your music and your art are already better than what is made in the churches today, by a lot, frankly. You can depict Jesus as blond and in armor, this isn’t that weird, He’s depicted as a Roman Emperor in a mosaic from Ravenna from antiquity and the Goths depicted Him as blond. Just direct your larp toward Christendom and see what fruit it brings. You’re watching a video of Sanguinus who google tells me is some blood angel, fine, you can find medieval hymns that mention the Sanguinisque Pretiosi of Christ and it kind of sounds like this, and some early Christians saw Jesus as an Angel.
I’m very pro-larp. If the guys doing Warhammer 40k just larped as Christians with some Christianized 40k lore aesthetics, it would be so socially fruitful, and I guess the only downside is that some assholes will constantly criticize them for not doing Christianity “authentically”, by which they mean performing it in such a fucking unaesthetic and tedious and boring way that no one shows up anymore except grandma and half the priests are gay. But whatever, the results would be better than playing Warhammer 40k, especially if you do full immersion baptisms.
There’s a comment from four years ago where someone simply posted an actual saying of Jesus, and it just fits in with all the rest:
And I kind of feel like this guy who replied last year:
Except I’d add: retain the larp, keep the larp, expand the larp. Believe whatever dogma you want which is conducive to prosocial conduct in the world. Who cares?
We have 40K-inspired Christianity at home.
On one hand the footage I've seen on it looks beautiful, and I absolutely wish there were more of that sort of campy power projection in the world (and the Mechanicus BGM people put on it is chef's-kiss). On the other, my late grandmother (most fanatically Orthodox member of the family) would for sure have called the whole thing a demonic monstrosity, what with the numerology of various metrics of the building encoding "1945" (on the meta level, a very heathen practice - the set of sacred numbers is closed) and the ambiguously idolatrous focus on military trophies. In a way it feels like the building is not so much dedicated to God as it is dedicating God and the church to War.
More options
Context Copy link
Yeah I know this one, I like it a lot.
Yeah that’s pretty metal. “Get every twelve year old boy interested in your cathedral in one easy step”.
Still, I think the theology and the liturgy is not optimal for “engagement”.
Unfortunately I suspect most twelve year old boys by that age are already inoculated against any related topic by endless schoolmarm-led political weekly lectures about le glorious grandfather victories.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
You've got your orders mixed up. Malleus are the demon hunters, the ones that deal with direct Chaos influence like demons and warp. Hereticus are the witch hunters, dealing with treason, heresy and witches.
I think Ordo Hereticus is the most important one. Chaos and Xenos threats have direct military countermeasures to fall back on, but you can't use spehs mehreens to root out internal dissent.
More options
Context Copy link
There is none. They are all mostly (in)competent, and Warhammer 40k makes a mockery of the meta-viewers moral ethics systems. Being a utilitarian in 40k is just as monstrous as a virtues-ethics or a wishy-washy moderate.
More options
Context Copy link
I was wondering why nobody had answered yet, and then I saw you only posted 30 minutes ago.
I don't know enough about 40k lore to put forward a compelling answer at all, but I've loved dabbling in the universe in videogames over the years. From this position it seems like a tough question to answer.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link