Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?
This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.
Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Shower thought: the state should manufacture luxury items, or alternatively subcontract the work to a few officially approved brands, which would pay enormous taxes for the privilege. If you buy from them, you know you’ve overpayed through the nose, so you must be rich. Basically the state sells you a licence to signal your wealth. Why should the perfectly good money of morons go into Bernard Arnault’s slimy pockets?
I always thought the state should find ways to get donations from citizens, normalize it, reward it somehow. It is technically a big charity with an army. I want to see politicians and business leaders prance around with their million dollar StatelyTM cufflinks.
I think the issue with that is often luxury products are actually marginally better than the defaults, and I don't think the state could consistently make actually good products. It's one thing to pay $10k for a watch that's 1% better than a $500 watch, it's another to pay $10k for a watch that's 1% worse
They could just repeal the ban on civilian post-'86 machine guns, but add a huge stamp tax. The wholesale prices will come back down to Earth by unrestricting the supply, but the retail prices would remain high due to the tax, and the government gets the windfall.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
This would only work if you outlaw all other luxury brands. why would someone buy a $5k Statelyᵀᴹ watch at 5000% markup when they can buy a $10k Rolex at a 400% markup? Anyone who bought a Stately would just look like a rube - which is the opposite of what they want!
I think the signalling structure isn't wealth → class, but wealth → quality → discernment → class
More options
Context Copy link
It's "paid" not "payed".
1616, William Shakespeare, Last will and testament:
This was well before the standardization of English spelling.
More options
Context Copy link
Please edit the rest of your comment to be consistent with The Bard's grammar, then.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I agree. The best way is titles, become the Count of Iowa for $1bn, Duke of New York for $20bn, your kids inherit the title for an extra 40% of the purchase price + inflation upon your death etc.
(un?)fortunately unconstitutional. But maybe we can come together and pass an amendment to make it okay.
More options
Context Copy link
You think they'd shell out just for courtesy titles? Although for that much dough we the people can throw in an exclusive weekend once a year, where the aristocracy gets to hunt in the sacred groves of west virginia.
The prices quoted are much too high, but people will do a lot for a knighthood or other such gongs. They aren't hereditary, due to vague egalitarianism and a desire not to inflate their value.
You might also be interested in the "For Iron I Gave Gold" campaign:
https://www.antoinettevondermuehll.com/For-Iron-I-Gave-Gold
Obvious scam. The man had been buried for over ten years at this point.
But yeah, it seemed to work, and so could this.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Ah, mercantilism. I agree, on the condition that we bring back the powdered wigs.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link