domain:preview.redd.it
"Like the glaze covering an earthen vessel are fervent lips with an evil heart."
I'm pretty sure the "glazing over the truth" sense is comfortably pre-bukkake -- quite a nice motto for the coming Jihad to boot.
This is way too much words and speculation. The actual reasons are quite simple: Muslim Arabs did 9/11; Muslim Arabs would do 10k 9/11s if they were capable of doing so, they say so themselves; Muslim Arabs also hate Israel and sometimes divert their hate in that direction; Muslim Arabs also disrupt other important interests to normal people like international boating trade; Muslim Arabs that have been allowed into America or borne to such people statistically disfavor the Republican party.
There is no reason for a Republican to be in favor of any Muslim Arab until you get to the "they hate Jews" dregs level. Instead, what the actual question is why would anyone support Palestine ever. They are losers who lose, and they lose while intentionally killing civilians. It is hard to think of a valid reason to support not just Hamas, but ANY Palestinian. They elected Hamas after all. Hamas continues to sustain support at levels unheard of in the US for a political party.
So it is all odd, probably nonsensical, arguments to convince anyone on the American right that Palestinians aren't bad. I certainly think that there is good evidence that they are deserving of a nuke to the face and subsequent scattering if not deserving in a full elimination.
That may or may not be true, but the history shows the people who end up being kings rarely behave like philosopher-kings and frequently behave like psychopathic serial killers. Today's kings are only relatively nice because they know if they aren't their head is quickly going to be on the chopping block. Where it's not the case (like African dictators or communist dictators) the picture is rather bleak.
I mean I'm more sympathetic to the latter for sure -- but "thou shalt not kill" has a little more weight of history behind it than "two weeks to flatten the curve" or whatever.
In my heart-of-hearts it's probably that it smells like a sales-job, as much as anything -- and I hate those.
You might argue the paramedic consents by virtue of their job, which is true, but their time is also finite and could be better spent on a QALY-basis helping alive people.
And the Swiss presumably have better things to do than killing people?
Also the person who finds you might be a family member, friend, or random innocent, none of whom contented to this or are paid to deal with it, which is just pure negative utility.
Perhaps this encourages the suicidal people to rethink their course of action?
In an case, life and death are both messy -- and I'm not a utilitarian.
it'd probably involve an emphasis on frumpy and especially too-large clothing
Hey, you don't have to call me out like that!
Yeah, something like that, but eroticized as someone permanently taking you and making it impossible to go back.
Holy crap, are virginity, the "breeding" kink, and pozzed culture linked psychologically?
Instagram is a dating app, it offers hotter girls with stiffer competition. I nuked social media because I'd spend a lot of time getting girls there to text me stuff, nudes and all, that place is a dating app.
Definitely both lol. I need to restart mma stuff soon.
Won't disagree with this sentiment. You need to get at least one girl in your bed by definition to have any hopes of having a girlfriend or a wife. Having enough experience allows you to find the right woman to hitch and keep her attracted to you, the game you learn and practice becomes a part of you. Your baseline changes which allows for attraction to remain there, reducing the chances of cheating.
I can always replicate it, having hoes around doesn't make you not love your family. We all are capable of attachment If we fuck anyone hot for enough times regularly, though this applies to girls a ton more than guys. Her sleeping with you once a week guarantees her falling in love as long as you are decent.
Was waiting for you to show up. I wrote about emancipation being the problem here, not his natural roommate, although violence and scorn agaisnt men is justified but questioning the need for emancipation is where most draw the line.
I agree with Jim on a lot, his perspective isn't complete or total, still much better than most.
I’ll admit, I’ve seen political signage and iconography on both sides that’s starting to get disturbingly close to the murals in Belfast that demarcate Catholic and Protestant neighborhoods.
The girl in question from you nation had bought herself a house by her age and grew up with an alcoholic father who passed away. Nightclubs attract plenty of cokesluts, it also attracts plenty of not explicit party animals.
I had to do tourists since I don't like Asians, I stopped once I came back because the women here are not as hot.
I have tried this, but it does not actually work. Maybe I need to upgrade my daki to a DHR7000 or something, but most fantasy centers around the closeness, etc. rather than just fucking.
I have no idea how people do it directly to pictures; I just lay on the bed and read them for the articles, so to speak.
Government enforced grass touching was tongue in cheek
Although trying to imagine how that would be enforced is really funny
Yeah they're kind of fucked either way given they committed to the unforced error of having the most nonsensical product naming scheme.
I do enjoy gpt5 has unlimited thinking model access if you use the one weird trick of saying "think hard before responding" and it doesn't even eat into your gpt5-thinking rate limit as a plus user.
I literally haven't selected "gpt5-thinking" in the model selector as a result, it's quite funny.
I mean one big difference is the Swiss person is consenting to dealing with your body and is paid explicitly to do so.
You might argue the paramedic consents by virtue of their job, which is true, but their time is also finite and could be better spent on a QALY-basis helping alive people.
Also the person who finds you might be a family member, friend, or random innocent, none of whom contented to this or are paid to deal with it, which is just pure negative utility.
In fact I now have to wonder how actual explicitly LGB establishments can now directly advertise themselves as such.
Internet.
There's some flaming bars that will literally have rainbows draped from every awning and at every curtain, every wall bright pink, but especially these days there's a lot of very boring-looking bars that will have a surprisingly deep event lists. (And, albeit more rarely, some flame-on looking bars that'll have an event list that looks like an Applebee's.)
Fair enough. For me it was 100% jealousy, but you and I are different.
I don't think that the Lotharios are actually a major problem preventing you or I from finding women to pair-bond with.
I'm not much into mistake theory, but what does annoy me about the "enemy areas" phrase is the consensus-building. @phailyoor's enemies are not the same as my enemies. I'd be fine with it if he wrote "Given the proliferation in areas controlled by my enemies,...".
My question was about prevalence. Yes, any 14 year old has probably figured out regular masturbation but I thought gooning was something different.
So far, every investigation that I have seen has resulted in one of two root causes:
- Operator pulled trigger
- Foreign object in trigger guard.
At this point, I can't rule out a mechanical problem causing uncommanded discharges, or if it's a bad design that encouraged operator error.
From what I've seen, think it's far more likely that the very wide trigger shoe and skinny trigger guard are making NDs too easy.
What is an honest straight man who is a zero on the Kinsey scale supposed to do?
Fair. If I had to come up with the no-gay-guy-would-wear-this setup, it'd probably involve an emphasis on frumpy and especially too-large clothing, but that's neither actionable nor useful advice for anyone in the real world.
FG framed it in a manner I've heard before: Back in the day, you're all but guaranteed to get it, unless you give up on the gay lifestyle altogether. Why not just get it out of the way?
Yeah, something like that, but eroticized as someone permanently taking you and making it impossible to go back. Not just for lifestyle-as-in-baths-and-chemsex, but even lifestyle-as-in-meeting-up-with-gays-for-parchessi: remember that it took until the late 1980s for official medical advice to say you couldn't transmit HIV by casual contact, and longer for a lot of people including gay guys to actually believe it.
He told me that he had met three potential partners who were HIV positive. I think he said two of them were on PrEP, and he might have slept with them. The other wasn't, and thus was rebuffed. I think this is what prompted the tirade about HIV and monkeypox. He said that man was being an idiot, and worsening general societal perception of the gays, as well as being a risk to their lifestyle.
There's been a long-standing presence of these sorta pragmatists, and while HIV gave them a lot more political capital (even when they were guessing), they've probably had more impact than my respectability politics side. I'm not sure how well the math works out in the long run, though.
I'm also confused about either the specific policies or a communication issue. My impression was that US medical advice is to actively test people for HIV first and never give PrEP to HIV positive people, and that the UK was similar. Are these people using PrEP as a byword for any oral anti-HIV medication, and they're really on ART (but then they're unusually medtechnical group, so that'd be a weird conflation)? Is FG assuming anyone without known HIV status is positive, and these guys are 'just' unknown status, so PrEP is more reasonable? Am I behind the curve on the literature, here? Am I ahead of the curve, and people giving out PrEP doing so in conditions that probably aren't helping?
I'm not too surprised by the existence of conservative or reactionary gay men. These guys seemed to be very liberal in outlook, they were friends with the trans bartender, so I guess they took the concept of LGBT solidarity more seriously!
Some of them are generally-conservative or reactionary, at least by local standards, but I've also seen it from older lefties who just have that topic as their exception, too, in the same way that a lot of TERFs are bog-standard feminists otherwise. But the solidarity arguments are still pretty strong for anyone that's seen a cis crossdresser called a fag, too, even if the actual policy proposals don't necessarily follow.
Not a bot, am reading -- just haven't seen anything much to argue with so far.
More options
Context Copy link