This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
ICE Needs Better Uniforms
Everyone's in favor of immigration enforcement until the masked goons in unmarked SUVs show up. Are a lot of these complaints pretextual? Sure. But it is hard to deny that ICE looks unprofessional. Law enforcement must command respect, or failing that, fear. Why are they in camo pants? Are they hunting illegals from covered positions with tranquilizer darts like deer? Such attire projects weakness. Our officers must be dignified, projecting the full power and majesty of the federal government, the greatest instituion God ever gave man.
There is an idea in the water supply that cool uniforms are fascism. People are far too afraid of ever doing anything that the Nazis might also have done. Still, aesthetics that conjure images of 1930s Germany are to be avoided (that means you Greg). I propose looking back even further for inspiration. 1914 was the last time regular armies in battle uniform looked cool. This sort of style would both pay homage to the heritage that the DHS Twitter account seems to think it is protecting, and project an aura of seriousness and respect.
Because it's 2026, I have created a small album of AI-generated concept art. Feel free to offer your own suggestions.
I believe this video changes everything and ICE is very much not shooting first. https://x.com/geiger_capital/status/2016640876865327169?s=46
So now the “execution” is a guy known by ICE for being violent with them. I am very much on the side of just shoot them but they have had an amazing amount of restraint on who to shoot.
Unless someone was holding on to these incidents being organic, rather than engineered by the protest organizers, I don't see how it changes much. They still made a mistake in the chaos of the situation.
Fairly obvious this was suicide by ice now
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Put this together with the claim from CNN that Pretti interfered with ICE chasing people, and it seems like this guy was trying to cause an incident, and eventually managed to find some officers who screwed up. Didn't work out so well for him, though I suppose being a martyr for the cause is an old and honorable position.
More options
Context Copy link
Not surprising. If let’s say any physical contact with ICE has a 0.1% chance to turn out deadly by accident, it is most likely that anyone that dies is someone who has rolled those dice many, many times. You see the same with ordinary deaths in police encounters like Floyd
Does Renee Good affect your thinking here? She had no habit of confrontation and got killed anyhow.
It's still a 0.1% chance, meaning that she just got very unlucky. It could be argued that she was attempting to flee but did not realize an ICE agent was in the path of her vehicle, and I would describe that as being unlucky.
The best way to maximize your health and longevity is to not get into physical confrontations with ICE, or really any law enforcement agency for that matter. You are far more likely to lose the fight than the cop is.
More options
Context Copy link
The "somehow" here being her formal application for a Darwin Award. Her shooting was, if anything, more justified than Pretti's.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
It is a completely different day. Just because you know someone is a bad actor doesn't mean you get to execute them when you get a chance. I'm not sure normal folks ever thought the guy was a saint. But he is an American citizen and extrajudicial killings of disarmed and restrained protestors by CBP is a violation of all of our rights.
When righties whine about lefties cheering on Kirk's death, I'll point them to your comment.
So I guess I have to put a limiting factor. They are obstructing then you can just shoot them.
I'm sure lefties will also find a convenient limiting factor for escalation to death. Probably something like: "Acting like a Nazi" to justify their future extrajudicial killings. Swell...
Future?. The New York Times of course decried the shooting... of the murderer.
Just wait till its the Department of Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion Enforcement, and they are executing chuds on the street to applause. One can't decry the viciousness and hatefulness of ones foes if you are in the pigsty rolling in the same mud with them.
Certainly you can; antifa has been doing so for a very long time.
There is nothing holding your side back other than practical considerations. Reciprocity does not factor into it. Any time there is an argument like "What if we did it to you?", the answer is either "You would anyway" or "You already have". And usually it's both.
Yes and nobody who is politically aware and independent/moderate gives antifa any respect. We all know they are violent hypocritical thugs. The right won that moral high-ground. Now you can throw away that hard fought and sacrificed hill for some cheap shots at the other side. On the mistaken belief that everyone is already on one side or the other. but it is frankly a very narrow black-and-white view of the world.
Being a knuckle dragging ape when it comes to politics might feel good but it is giving into the basest and worst impulses of humanity. Some of us, the adults in the room, want to aspire to a more evolved human species without such primordial tribal bickering. Feel free to continue back down the road to capped-dunbar number polities on your own.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link