site banner
PaperclipPerfector  6d ago (text post)   24630 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 20, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

An unknown assassin has attempted to kill President Trump at the White House Correspondents Dinner tonight. One person is dead. President Trump is unharmed. The disposition of the assassin is unknown.

The "anti-racists" will have a field day with that case. A white guy, active shooter is apprehended and in custody, while blacks are offed for way less. I expect them to move the conversation in that direction. Can let Trump set the narrative.

The assassin is black thoughbeit.

Mixed race it seems...

The shooter wasn't white unless my racedar is totally totally busted

Where I live in Europe - if your skin is lighter than sicilian and you have foreskin - you are white.

In the US, you're not white if you have any noticeable non-European ancestry. Like, Obama is technically biracial (white mother, black father), but basically everyone considers him to be black.

When in Rome, do as the Romans do. When attempting to judge the political fallout of an American assassin's attempt on an American president's American life on American soil, do as the Americans do.

That guy's darker than Sicilian. No idea on the foreskin

The US has one of the highest rates of circumcision in the West, even among the goyim/kafir.

Proud to be in the minority on that one.

It's very hard to tell skin tone from photos, but he looks lighter than Sicilian to me (and I'm 1/4 Sicilian). I'd guess maybe 25% African-American, the rest some sort of white, maybe including a little Hispanic too (from the spelling "Tomas")

A family photo posted on Kiwi Farms (with no source given, so it may be fake) appears to indicate that his father is fully black and his mother is fully white.

his father is fully black and his mother is fully white

Presidential assassination attempt, from the casting director who brought you Bridgerton.

I'm wondering if some news outlets are doctoring the images to make his skin lighter. Compare the Kiwi Farms Family photo to this one from Reuters.

Nah, it just looks to be different lighting. Indoors with family camera versus well-lit with professional rig is enough to explain the difference.

See also this photo of Allen in his graduation gown, he's light-skinned enough. Definitely black enough to be classed as African-American/Black, but not very dark.

The photo in the Reuters article is the same as the one that Trump posted, without alteration.

Biracial high-functioning autistic. Wild speculation but I'd imagine he bounced off the workforce, decided Indie Game Dev was his passion project and then got cajoled at Tendies-confiscation point into signing on with the tutoring service he worked for by his parents after spending too long in the tank. Then one day decides that he's gonna attempt to be a historical figure.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats