Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?
This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.
Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
So, I'm a bit late to the thread here, but I've been playing around with Gemini off-and-on the past few weeks.
Now, I keep encountering "AI boosters" extolling the universal utility of LLMs, that there's nobody who can't benefit from using an LLM as a tool in some portion of their job or daily life. Well, I've been looking for those uses, and I'm not seeing it.
So, my question: what is my personal use-case for an LLM? I'm a NEET, I don't code, I don't do any of the things I see people regularly using LLMs for.
My husband used an LLM to manage his recipes for his diabetes. He would provide his recipe and the resulting blood sugar. Use the LLM to bounce ideas off when the results weren't as expected and it made it easy for him to track changes over time.
If he knew he was going to have a meal that might blow out his blood sugar he could easily get meals that were blood sugar neutral from the LLM. It was a quick query, which worked better for him than paging through recipe books and spread sheets. And since he trained the LLM on his food choices and what they (typically) did to his blood sugar, he had a bespoke meal service at his fingertips.
(He also used them for art work trained on his art work. Collages without all the cut and paste up. But that's a bit less generalizeable.)
I only use ai/ml at work. But I have debated asking it for recommendations to clean up my computer and email. Things have gotten out of hand.
⁎seethes in anger at how his mother has consistently failed to organize her computer and email despite repeated pestering⁎
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
"Here is everything I've ever written down, public and private. Tell me what patterns exist that I might have overlooked"
"I always wanted an app that would do X. Please build one and install it on my phone."
"I'm reading this book (pdf attached). Do a deep analysis of chapters 1-3, as if for a book club, and let's discuss"
"(attached photo of a product's ingredients) explain what all these ingredients do individually, and how they come together to form a complete product"
"Geoguessr this photo and explain your answer"
"create a custom tpot (twitter) character creator, complete with all the obscure classifications, kiki/bouba, apollo/dionysus, theatre kid/band kid, Kegan stages, the works"
"calculate the optimal talent build for this game given these specifics about its combat system. explain and show your work"
"help me unpack why I irrationally hate this popular thing"
"give me the tl;dr of this 2 hour youtube transcript so I can decide if it's worth my time"
"educate me on the background context I need to understand this current world event"
Sounds like a recipe for bricking my phone.
Why?
Why would I need that?
When would I ever need that?
I have no clue what any of that even means.
What game? Why?
That needs a youtube transcript available (I don't know how to get one).
"Help me cultivate the virtue of curiosity"
-- but, to your points:
Really? That's not what I hear from most the people I know — then again, the rest of my family uses iPhones, so Apple…
And besides, what would I even need a custom app for? I only got a smartphone, like, a year ago, because the decade-old LG flip-phone I had finally died. I use a phone to make calls. That's about it.
If not everything, then enough that discussing it with an LLM is unlikely to provide much novel insight.
Not really.
Where would I even see such a "cool photo"? And, no, I know I'm going to spend the rest of my life too poor to ever travel anywhere.
That's not an explanation; and, again, what use would I have for that? For one, I disdain our "pop culture." Secondly, work with it to what end?
Absolutely none. That's my point.
And that's something that's actually useful information. Thanks. (And I'll note — I got this useful information from asking a human being.)
I have a book "insight" prompt that goes like:
This always pulls out a lot of things that I missed.
(I think in general, the better the author, the more you'll find they've have sprinkled clever connections, allusions, and foreshadowing, often in a kind of hidden way. The LLMs are easily already superhuman at pulling these details out.)
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
This description of you is pretty imprecise, but it clearly highlights one goal you're trying to achieve right now: to learn what a modern LLM could be useful for in your life. I think modern LLMs could be useful for you by providing an answer to that question, though I'd suggest using Claude or Chatgpt over Gemini. I think Grok might even be better than Gemini right now.
In the best set of current benchmarks I could quickly find, there are only four with leaderboard results for both Grok and Gemini, but Gemini is leading in 3 out of 4... which is definitely an underestimate; there are no leaderboards with Grok results but no Gemini results, and spot checking shows there's at least some Gemini leaderboard results where Grok was tested but no version made the leaderboard.
Gemini is not as competitive versus GPT (7 out of 17) or Claude (5 out of 16) though.
Subjectively it's pretty nice. I use Gemini to "self-" study advanced math (I'm a PhD, but applied math that leaned heavily into analysis, so my topology is weaker and my abstract algebra is pathetic), and even with its moderate/default setting I catch it in errors only about as often as it catches me, and its errors are probably technicalities more often than mine are. The other day I had it actually make an embarrassing error and double down, the first time it's done either since I started using it, but even then I just had to turn on "advanced reasoning" and retry for it to see its mistake.
More options
Context Copy link
AIUI, Grok requires Twitter. How much do Claude or Chatgpt cost? I use Gemini because it's free, and because my existing Google/gmail account means I don't have to sign up for anything new.
You can have a Grok account with a normal e-mail. I'll caveat that it's not the smartest model out there, though it's generally less censored and the usage caps on the normal accounts are pretty generous.
And all of the major providers have free tiers, or there's LMArena as an option.
More options
Context Copy link
I pay for Claude & ChatGPT $20/month, but both have free versions IIRC. I don't recall if the free versions have access to the latest models, though. I think they might allow signing up through Google account, but I don't recall if I used that or set up separate usernames/passwords.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
They can be useful for answering questions that do not fit well into conventional keyword-based Internet searches. A recent AAQC alleges that they are quite useful in language learning and have essentially reached competence in the editing even of full-length novels (given proper preparation). And, of course, they excel in generating text pornography (especially the local decensored models), as several users have testified in recent months (1 2 3).
And I don't really have any such questions, really.
No languages to learn, no novels to edit.
Not interested. Plus, the free models available online are mostly censored, and my laptop lacks the power to host most anything locally.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Most of what I use LLMs for is creating bespoke fiction. Have you ever had a story you wanted to read, but nobody has written? AI can do that. The top creative writing models (claude-fable-5, claude-opus-4-6-thinking, gemini-3.1-pro-preview, etc.) are really good at this. If you want smut, then your best bet is grok-4.20-beta1.
Alternatively, you can use them to create explainers in the style of your favorite authors (also a creative writing capability). Go ahead and ask them to explain economics like they are Scott Alexander, or write a moving guide in the voice of Eliezer Yudkowsky, or an introduction to anime in the style of Robin Hanson.
They can also do your research for you. Suppose you want a list of 1950s science fiction movies in color along with a short review written in the format of Leonard Maltin, including runtime and year of release? Done.
As they say, "Press X to doubt." What I've seen of AI-written fiction is barely fanfic tier at best.
And how much do those cost?
And why would I ever need this?
Again, why would I ever need this?
Here's some samples of Fable 5 writing:
If you know any fanfic like that, hook me up; I'm always looking for good authors.
But, honestly? Looking at this and your other replies, I think that your problem is that you just don't want to do anything.
I haven't checked all of those links but from what I recall of your previous LLM Evangelion smut, it was just watering the prompt down with meaningless (and very aislop-coded) prose. If that's your criteria for good authors I suppose you can stick with AI. Any amateur "bad" human author would add more creative input on accident, let alone if he tried.
More options
Context Copy link
Well for starters, most fanfiction (or fiction of any kind) consists of more than 4k words stapled together from eight loosely connected vignettes.
I guess there's value in the specificity, but I feel like baseline Mottizan imagination could crank out one of these but better while taking a crap.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link