site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of September 11, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

9
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The United Auto Workers have gone on strike: https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/us-auto-union-strike-three-detroit-three-factories-2023-09-15/

What happens if Ford and GM simply say: "okay, you're fired"? This seems to have quite a few benefits, mostly that they can get rid of union workers and remove the threat of another strike.

I'll admit that unions sortof confuse me. I didn't grow up around them and have always wondered the mechanism by which everybody gets to quit their job but then demand extra money to come back. Are the people running factory machines inside of Ford and GM (or starbucks, or a hollywood writers room) really that highly skilled?

It should be noted that Tesla is not unionized, and will not be a part of this strike. Do you guys think there is a chance that the government tries to force Tesla to stop making cars during the strike to make things more fair?

I'll be honest about my feelings towards unions: I don't get it at all, and I think I'm missing something. I do think that workers should have an adversarial relationship with their employer, but it seems to me like unions have all but destroyed the american auto industry. I think you'd be insane to not just fire anybody who joins a union on the spot. I don't get how places can "vote to unionize". Why does the employer not simply fire the people doing the organizing? Sure you can all vote to make a starbucks union, but...I just won't hire anybody in your union.

To add even more spice, California just approved unemployment for striking workers. No matter how ridiculous I think we've gotten, there's always a new vanguard to subsidize people that refuse to work with funds from people that are working.

Oof. You know you've gone off the far-left deep end when governor Newsom, of all people, is lightly coughing and hinting that this is unaffordable. So now my California tax dollars will be going towards supporting a strike for WGA workers who, in 2020, were earning a bare minimum of $4,546 a week. (I know the numbers in the current contract under negotiation were leaked, but I'm having a hard time finding a good source...? I suspect most of the media is on the side of any union, anywhere, anytime and would very much not like the hoi polloi to find out just how rich these brave freedom fighters actually are.)

Newsom is positioning himself for a Presidential run in 2028 (or, who knows, 2024 if Biden keels over). He's started a meaningful statewide initiative targeting retail crime, and he's bashing SF leaders for failing to deal with the homeless issue and perpetually kicking the issue down the road (yes, ironic, I know). But I applaud unprincipled politicians who do things that people will benefit from purely for electoral reasons, because that's at least better than the status quo.

The fact that Gavin Newsome is even considering a presidential run and that there are people who think this is a good idea is a massive black pill for me.

California has got a practically divine set of advantages:

  • Some of the best geography in the world. Temperate climate, massive mountains which create plenty of fresh water for both the coastal cities as well as the extremely fertile central valley.

  • A massive coastline

  • The 20th century saw Entertainment and tech, some of the most lucrative industries in our country, base themselves in California.

  • Not much in the way of natural disasters. Some earthquakes and wildfires, but the wildfires are arguably California's fault, and the earthquakes dont' seem to be much of a problem for a 21st century city.

Despite having the money for it, the desire for it, and near total control of the government meaning free rein with the funding to pursue basically any policy they want, California feels like a failing civilization. Californians and the politicians they elect have squandered the biggest head start of anybody ever, and still instead of reflecting on their obvious failures of their ridiculous policies, they just keep doubling down.

Temperate climate, massive mountains which create plenty of fresh water for both the coastal cities as well as the extremely fertile central valley.

The Central Valley is more fruits, vegetables, and nuts. Corn and wheat are easier to harvest, so middle-class farmers can own the farm and buy a mechanical harvester or something. Fruits, vegetables, and nuts benefit from intensive manual picking, so farm owners hire outside labor.

The agricultural products that Central Valley and Mediterranean climates produce are very difficult to mechanize. Cereal crops are quite simple - while John Deere and Cargill are making it harder to eke out a freehold living as a farmer or dairy owner, it has been possible to save, invest, and eventually own your own farm through mechanization for decades.

Almonds, olives, strawberries, cherries, apples, oranges - all of these have been notorious for difficulty of mechanizing. Fruit trees, even monoculture and hybridized ones, will have fruit ripening at different times. By the time the fruit falls to the ground, it's not salvageable.

A dark, open secret on the West Coast is that our agricultural richness is only possible through subverting minimum wage laws. The only way we can have Fujis for $2/lb is because of shared common interests between the Democrats and Republicans in power. Democrats in Washington are heavily-union backed, and the unions have their roots in perpetuating marginalization of immigrants. They turn a blind eye to the poverty wages and intimidation tactics that enforce an underclass of Mexican and Central American laborers that destroy their bodies to give us cheap fruit.

  • quoted from the discussion on the original subreddit on Scott's article on the Central Valley

the earthquakes dont' seem to be much of a problem for a 21st century city.

Excuse me but...what?

And a massive coastline in itself means nothing. Indonesia also has one, Greenland as well.

I wonder if California is the biggest argument against open borders. My understanding (which is probably wrong) is that California until the early 90s was the beach boy California (hell Ronald Reagan was governor and easily won the state during elections) until a lot of migration changed it. That changed the voting dynamic leading to present day California.

Californians and the politicians they elect have squandered the biggest head start of anybody ever, and still instead of reflecting on their obvious failures of their ridiculous policies, they just keep doubling down.

In fairness that’s mostly pre-Gavin Newsome.

I've checked the article, and the other one linked in it. It's rather misleading to call these crimes 'piracy'.

On the other hand, media spin can do a lot with a slick looking fella.

Yeah. He speaks clearly and as far as politicians go looks great. The media would give him a great tail wind. Why shouldn't he take a chance at the presidency?