site banner
Advanced search parameters (with examples): "author:quadnarca", "domain:reddit.com", "over18:true"

Showing 25 of 111569 results for

domain:aporiamagazine.com

"Let's elect the most leftwing candidate we can."

"Great, so Stalin then?"

Does rephrasing it that way help you understand the joke, or are you going to go down with the USS Waging The Culture War?

Literally "Yes [practically] all men!" That's correct. "Locker room talk" is real.

There's a Chappell Show sketch about a woman who develops psychic powers and hear men's thoughts. She is comedically horrified at every man she meets including a middle school boy. You are resembling that character a bit.

Sure, but that still means credit goes to Stalin, no?

The rightmost and "our beliefs" may be different things. Extrapolating your views to the most extreme failure state possible is not endorsing hyperbolic extremism.

If a Young Democrat said we need more government control over the economy and another one sarcastically replied "okay, Chairman Mao", I would not interpret that as literal support for Maoist economic policies.

Granted, they did do the Nazi thing of rounding up co-ethnics and shipping them off to concentration camps in Siberia

By contrast, there's a country in the Near East- the ethnicity of its founders even had 'nazi' as part of their name- that despite its small size actively sends armed 'settlers' into a combat zone to displace the natives there, spends a great deal of treasure doing this, and the people that do those things have a TFR above 2. That just ain't a thing the average communist does.

Because they don't have to. Russia / the USSR is a different creature, but the Soviet satellite states were so ethnically homogeneous, they'd give the average Californian a stroke. And come to think of it this might even apply to the USSR, give or take minor Soviet Republics being flooded with ethnic Russians to maintain control, it's not like you were free to travel around that country. As for TFR, I think my generation is the last above-replacement one.

I was a Daily Show watching Dem-voting asshole internet atheist

Even the guy who used to write for John Oliver and still is liberal in every conceivable way is getting fed-up of the activists blowing up mountains out of molehills and the 'trust the science' bullshit being, well, bullshit.

More importantly, why didn't they count hard Rs and soft As independently? I need to know how close to a real MW2 lobby we're talking here.

Anyway, "this girl is fully retarded" is hardly worth clutching pearls over... maybe imitation pearls?

Remember a little while back when there were finger-wagging lists of words that were no-no because they were ableist, including describing things as "things are insane round here" or "we're crazy busy this week"?

So terms like 'retarded' are no-no because slurs and because 'excuse me, my brother is retarded, how dare you?' as per this article ("When someone casually says, “she’s so crazy” in an off-handed way, they could be talking about someone like my mom.")

one could imagine a fascist movement built on the basis of "our nation has never been particularly great or important, but we are going to be great in the future".

Without that specific spiritual foundation it just decays into regular old authoritarian nationalism. Most right wing African governments have this sort of setup and they are recognizably not fascist. And South America has it's fair share of Caudillisms too.

When you start to bring out some mythic past to rewrite the history and meaning of all institutions through fanatical and totalitarian mass politics, then you're in fascist territory.

In a weird way the Woke movement is as close to Fascism as MAGA, just from the other side. But neither are fascist.

Or Imperial Russia, whose failure to do exactly this was the entire reason Stalin rose to Tsardom in the first place.

I thought about doing 8/16 IF but that's quite hard to fit in my schedule. Looks like 10/14 is working OK for me so far, and it fits well, but if it becomes not enough I could try to go to 8/16.

Talk is cheap, of course. What did they actually do to support the average working-class non-party-member family? Granted, they did do the Nazi thing of rounding up co-ethnics and shipping them off to concentration camps in Siberia, but far as I know that wasn't an explicit policy goal and was more about paying off supporters than anything that would have benefited the average Russian.

By contrast, there's a country in the Near East- the ethnicity of its founders even had 'nazi' as part of their name- that despite its small size actively sends armed 'settlers' into a combat zone to displace the natives there, spends a great deal of treasure doing this, and the people that do those things have a TFR above 2. That just ain't a thing the average communist does.

Yes, Mr. Ivanov, Alexander Ivanovich, Alexander, Alex, Sasha, Sanya, Shura, Shurik, Ivanych, etc. are all the same person, depending on context. And using the wrong one in a wrong context may be a major social faux pas too. Unless you grew up with it, it can be a bit tricky to guess, especially that some diminutives have very little obvious connection to the full name, and some of them are also non-unique. You just have to know it.

Would you happen to be the Twitter Skeletor? That guy rocks and you rock.

I haven't heard of the Young Republicans before this.

Their Wikipedia page is almost empty except for the story that just broke out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Republicans

They have under 4000 followers on Twitter https://x.com/yrnational

I checked their website and most state chapters have at most a Facebook page.

They haven't seem to have accomplished much that would be newsworthy.

I'm sure they do stuff, but as an outsider doing some minor research, I can't say I'm impressed.

Yeah, he should get some credit for that. It's more than you can say for Republican Spain, or even modern progressives.

when he realized it's ruining the country, and he might have a war or two to fight

Translation: Stalin perceived that the valuation of men in society increased (or would increase), resulting in it being necessary to pander more to their interests lest his forces simply permit the Germans to walk right into Moscow and overthrow the government through inaction.

If you had the same access to 'Young Democrats' or whatever it is on a college campus, you could 'both sides' this pretty quickly

Indeed, Vance did exactly this, bringing up the Virginia AG candidate who called for the deaths of conservatives’ children in a text message exchange.

a total lack of emphasis on family formation and children

I was just a baby at the time, but that seems a bit off. My parents told me the message at the time was "the family is the basic cell of a society", and other such slogans that you could easily mistake for coming from the Tradcath sphere.

Made an IF routine where I only eat anything between 10am and 8pm, outside of it I only drink water or tea

When my a1c crept into the prediabetic range, sticking to an eating window of 9 to 5, at least 6 out of 7 days a week fixed me right up. Dropped my a1c by 0.5 after a year. I cut back on a lot of things by virtue of not fucking snacking at night, but didn't cut out alcohol, carbs or sugars entirely.

Speaking of, I should probably get my yearly scheduled soon, make sure things haven't relapsed.

Why? I think it was very feminized- layers of bureaucracy simply to make work (especially important for women), a total lack of emphasis on family formation and children (China is an even better example of that), and total equality of outcome (which favors the gender with the evolutionary disadvantage when it comes to producing physical things at scale).

Were the same things true of the fascists? No; where communists increase bureaucracy fascists do away with it, where communists fail to provide suitable accommodations fascists say 'living space', and equality of outcome is as far as I can tell not a thing for a Nazi (unless it's a group for which a claim that they owe reparations can be made).

I don't think the USSR was a particularly feminised society.

As feminists (and even superficially non-feminist women) will tell you, even today's society isn't. The USSR definitely did have a short stint of the sort of progressive craziness we are facing right now, which Stalin had to cut short, when he realized it's ruining the country, and he might have a war or two to fight.

that both sides say extreme things and that both sides get indignant at the other does not prove the situation is symmetrical. How do you prove that someone is joking or if they are being serious?

Epithets like “f----t,” “retarded” and “n--ga” appeared more than 251 times combined.

I just found it funny the writers censored out "faggot" and "nigga", but not "retarded". So they're trying to get the list of the worst offensive things that were said but the 3rd item on the list wasn't offensive enough to censor but it's all grouped together to get the 251 count?

Mosiman was derided by members of the chat as “beaner” and “sp-c.”

How come they didn't censor out "beaner", isn't that racist too?

What's with the self-censorship, anyway? Politico had no problem quoting faggot just a year ago:

https://www.politico.com/search?q=faggot&s=newest

Same with bitch, cunt, nigga, nigger, spic, and chink. All words that have appeared in previous politico articles uncensored.

[ideas fundamentally, perhaps existentially hostile to the intersectional coalition] are common, [ideas fundamentally and existentially hostile to the intersectional coalition] are not

You see why they treat the two as equivalent?