site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  1yr ago (text post)   38071 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 27, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

11
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

entered the Covenant School via a side door

Once again, actually locking doors seems to be the anti-mass shooting low-hanging fruit

The doors were locked. The perp shot out the glass.

Ah - so then hardening the doors would be the fruit but that is substantially less low hanging.

There's glass that's harder to destroy, but the real low-hanging fruit is giving guns and training to teachers.

Doesn't the US military have loads and loads of old 9mm pistols hanging around ? Ditto for ammo and magazines.

Vastly cheaper, plus, it's not like they have anywhere to run in a school, etc.

Doesn't the US military have loads and loads of old 9mm pistols hanging around ?

No one should want that old inventory.

I mean, is all of the vast pistol inventory that used up ?

Dunno; I'd imagine that, even with how mistreated many acutal military-service M9s may be, it's probably not improbable to refurbish them with spare parts and some TLC post-service. The Beretta 92 overall is still kind of in that "refuses to die" phase, especially since the adoption of the M17/M18 wasn't that long ago.

From the footage released, the shooter did not shoot the lock. Instead, the doors had glass panels, which were shot out and easily traversed through.

Then it makes total sense. Shooting out the lock only reliably works with a shotgun from what I've seen.

I know I know, ">Amerishoots," but when I was in school, every time we had lockdown drills someone would always point out, "couldn't the bad guys just shoot their way through the door?" and the teachers would have to begrudgingly admit that yes, they could do that and that we were pretty much wasting our time.

The proper response to an actual school shooting is to run the f*** out of the school building as soon as possible.

This is of course enormously inconvenient to administrators running a drill, and so they don't do it.

All of the active shooter training I've seen at the university and corporate level emphasizes "run, hide, fight" (in order). Admittedly, I think K-12 does still emphasize locking doors and emptying hallways, but they have invested in better doors and access control in the last decade.

It is the proper response to a guy hiding on the property with a gun after robbing a liquor store, which is when it wasn't a drill for me.

At a small high school where I used to work, this is literally what they said. They did not have drills. It seemed very sensible.

It's not such a good plan at a large elementary school, though.

This will double the cost of all contractor work on public schools. It’s also a massive pain in the ass.

I have never seen a school that had doors that weren't locked from the outside after school hours. The problem seems to be actually locking them, not that they can't be locked

I think this means that if you are doing work that requires you to alternate between inside and outside, you will now need to funnel yourself back through the main entrance rather than go back in the door you came out of.

Though really they should just put card readers on every door. It's a safety issue the other direction as well. Imagine a teacher gets locked out and can't reach a child in distress, for any reason.

https://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/statistics/v14i14.pdf

An estimated 4,000 school building fires were reported by United States fire departments each year

Optimizing for relatively rare events at the cost of more commonplace ones is bad policy.

Is it really possible that you are not familiar with door push bars, standardly installed on just about every institutional door I've ever seen?

"Locking doors" in this case really only requires that the door not open from the outside. A crash bar (and possibly an alarm system) wouldn't prevent safe egress in a fire, but prevents random entry.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats