domain:aerosociety.com
The UK has the best hay people. Everybody knows it. They said many years ago "The UK will have the best hay people" and I said "No, I want America to have the best hey people". But it's better this way, I'll let the UK have the best hay people. Just this one time. Maybe I'll tariff their hay people, I don't know. What do you think?
I worship Truth. If your God is not Truth, then I do not worship him. Fortunately, Jesus said "I am... the Truth," so I'm happily a Christian.
That's you putting your definition of God above God himself.
What is God to you? I still don't understand. What differentiates him from another human being?
Depends what you mean by "happen", as I was half-joking. There was a guy recording himself following some woman around the park. I think her dog was somewhere where they weren't allowed, and the guy was complaining about that. She wanted to be left alone, but after being ignored for too long, he pulled out some dog treats out of his pocket, and tried to get the dog to come to him. She freaked out, and started screaming that if he doesn't stop, she'll call the cops and tell th a creepy black man is stalking her. This during BLM times was seen as an implied death threat. She promptly became the face of racism, I thinkbshe lost her job, and for a while even her dog.
I don't think any NGO was involved, that part was the joke, but honestly at this point nothing woupd surprise me.
They're not mutually exclusive options, either. Chavvy white underclass girls doing chavvy things in a park, molesty migrant approaches them because they're chavvy and he's molesty, and he bites off more than he can chew.
There's Central Park Dog Karen (really, two of them; it was a case of dueling Karens) and Central Park Bike Karen (which involved no Karens, as it turns out). As far as I know neither was a setup by a creepy NGO.
For those not in the know, the above two users have revealed themselves to be Tumblr users. By saying I recognize this, I am also revealing myself to have logged into Tumblr in the past year. I hope you all appreciate the sacrifice I made to explain the joke.
Did this…happen? I vaguely remember some Central Park nonsense. I don’t remember it being a psyop.
Bozo the clown was not on the FBI payroll.
Was he?
I hate Hanania.
I hate Fuentes.
Uh, I don't really have much to contribute. I just wanted to say it.
Seems almost identical to the video of the minnesota girl saying nigger. We don't see the initial brandishing of the 'weapon' in either case, but presumably right after that, the guy pulls out his phone and tries to bait it out again to share on the internet, even if he has to pursue her a bit. And in both cases, the guy filming suspects he'll be more sympathetic.
Eventually, the kind of older women who would have reported young people who received visits from opposed-gender people to their landlords in the 1950s will be the main enforcers of SJ norms
This has already happened; traditional Christianity (or at least, people who claimed to be them) was this for that age group up until the mid-00s until it was clear to the average participant it was naturally dying out as a morally-respected force.
- We know guy filming thinks he is innocent (or else why share the video?)
- We know girl brandishing blades has chosen her weapons poorly. (it's a chopping knife, not a slicing/stabbing knife. she probably wouldn't do much damage with that hatchet before someone wrested it away from her)
- They're also quite large, and would be awkward to carry around even stuffed down her sweatpants. Neither girl seems to have a bag or backpack
- I think staged video is unlikely because of spontaneous behavior - girl decides to try and put the knife away, then pulls it out again. Leaves, comes back, etc.
I don't have a good guess at what is going on, but I suspect it was some mundane disagreement that escalated. Possible the girl ran to a flat and came back with the two biggest weapons she could find on short notice.
Groypers are not a real faction in republican politics lol. I could speak with a dozen R voters off the street here in Texas and I doubt more than 1 even knows they exist.
As far as I understand that tape is fake and/or it's not Fuentes in the video. Even the geniuses at Kiwi Farms (who never let a salacious accusation go to waste) don't seem to think it's real.
And just for transparency reasons, my opinion of Fuentes any time he comes up amounts to roughly "Who gives a shit?"
If this were the case, why is he following them around and filming? He’s walking toward them, and they’re backing away, not the other way around. Certainly I can believe that the two girls are not, themselves, “innocent” exactly. But it is very weird to follow two teenage girls around the park with a camera.
Okay, I got my conspiracy theory.
This was all pre-planned by one of those creepy NGOs to be a Central Park Karen situation kicking of Boat Migrant Lives Matters, except it backfired by being YesChadded into orbit.
TL;DR: The battlefield to defeat SJP is the marketplace of ideas.
We tried. SJP played dirty by sending goons into the marketplace and attacking opponents outside it. Fighting it only on that battlefield is a losing battle.
Also pollong was done recently and 6% of those polled had a favorable opinion of Fuentes, 33% had a negative view of him, and presume the rest had no clue who he was: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Bj9_tUbMG1yCnME1rc7ggQF7qt8mmxetIfD7bQL167w/htmlview#gid=0
And, confirming my stereotypes for the median white nationalist, Fuentes has highest favorability amongst young black and hispanic men.
Make its own cartoon memes of how bad things really are for the poor migrants and refugees and oppressed BIPOC.
They are, when the right sees them the response is generally "yes chad". Enough so the right makes their own
Yeah, you didn't really read this accurately. It the "we are not really the basis for goodness."
It's also the "best guess." Don't pretend you didn't put that in there lol.
Yes, God is subject to 2+2=4 here in this example. You don't see it? It's possible for God to want something other than 2+2=4 but not be able to change it. That makes Him subject to it. It's an external power He has to work around. "Just how reality is," - That is putting limits on God. There is something outside of your concept of God that is more powerful than Him. Why not worship that thing?
And, yet again, an example of what I'm gesturing towards. Really, if God is everything you believe he is, except that there's some fundamental law of reality he can't change (perhaps simply the law of non-contradiction), you'd worship that law rather than God? That's on you. That's you putting your definition of God above God himself. That's you saying, "if I'm wrong in the slightest about what God is, I will cease to be Christian."
I don't think you actually would, but I'm just saying this to illustrate the absurd overconfidence you have in your theological framework.
The funny thing is, we both agree that God lacks the power to change 2+2=4. It's just that you think that this is because 2+2=4 is fundamentally part of God, and God can't change himself, whereas I think 2+2=4 is part of truth, and God can't change truth.
Epstein was not an ethnic group
Sure he was; the political football being played with him currently is partially about to what degree that should matter.
I don't understand why anyone records themselves committing crimes and then uploads them to the internet with some sob story about how they are actually the victim. And yet it just keeps happening. And there are always people willing to take their side, which I suppose shouldn't shock me anymore, but it still does.
I was watching some old Gad Saad interview maybe 10 years ago, and he was talking about the pathos of the 3rd world regarding honor and truth. Which basically amounts to, commit fully to the lie, and never stop doubling down and escalating, no matter how obvious the lie is. His example involved an uncle he was having a debate with over some fact, and who was right about this particular fact. The next day he mentioned to his uncle that he looked it up, and had in fact been correct, and his uncle just calmly claimed that the sides of the debate had actually be reversed. Broke Gad's mind for a minute. He had spend the afternoon arguing for *A when his uncle was vehemently claiming Not A, and then suddenly the next day his uncle is claiming it had been the opposite in the cold light of fact? All to maintain some facade of having been correct?
But that's just how some people work. Just tell a brazen impossible to believe lie, and there exist some subset of people who will throw out everything they know about how the world works (if they knew anything at all) and just default to "Well, it's one person's word against another, I just don't know"
She did become very antivax through Covid, calls it the clot shot, etc.
I didn't get the vaccine either, but don't really subscribe to the larger conspiracy theories surrounding the vaccine.
When I had access to her device I briefly checked AI usage. Nothing that appeared problematic.
Some of the emails and longer chat messages from the scammers sound like AI to me.
eh, I still don't really buy it -- Scott is just handing Bob an idiot ball here. The correct response to the excuses is "yeah, be that as it may I said I was playing tit-for-tat and that's what I'll keep doing. If you want us to enter a defect-defect spiral that's your call".
Thank you for your service. Of course, you still won't be spared in the purge of Tumblrites...
More options
Context Copy link