This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
tl;dr: It seems almost impossible to judge the validity, reliability and authenticity of the goals and states principles of those outside of your circle. Do they actually believe it, do they actually think it's true, will they actually do it? Eg, "No new wars" and the Kamala deadenders who run the D's to pick an example from each ruling tendency.
I come here to-day to humble brag about my money, but in a culture war way; and to share my sure to succeeded investment system. This is financial advice, and you can trust it! (This is not financial advice, do not trust me.)
I've recently made a bit of a small amount of a fuckton of money based on starting amounts; took my fuck around money and plowed it into you guessed it, oil futures and related industries before it became clear that no, he really is that stupid. I'm up a lot on top of my previous gains from betting (read: instructing my investment guy who tells me which southeast asian restaurants are for real) to bet as if the various Trump economic policies would:
Not meaningful increase productive employment in the US.
Not help the balance of trade issue.
Not hem china in in any way, and in fact increase their gravity as an economic center.
Not lower the debt at all, public or private; and in fact increase the debt massively. (This one didn't amount to much, there isn't much money to be made here until the US starts to go downhill for real, so it's just positioning for now.)
This compounding my gains during the Biden boom times, I am up quite a bit, so much in fact that It no longer is fun gambling haha stonks money and now I'm worried about what it does; so I'm taking it as far out of the US economic sphere as it is possible (which isn't that far) as a hedge. I would buy gold with it, but I kinda think that it might not be a good idea right now, I don't know.
As to the culture war angle: If by merely assuming that the ruling party will fail at all it's stated goals and betting against them no matter how flimsy the reasoning gets, I make a killing; how does it keep on rolling? How do people wake up and see the all the red arrows, all the "I'm warning you!"s becoming "I told you so!"s and stay hype?
It would be one thing if there was some sort of big social project that the party was ride or die for; but even it's most sacred commitment (deporting non-whites) was limited in scope (non white, but not the ones the boss or his friends or his allies rely on, H1Bs for all and Farm Scut work for everyone south of the border!) and on the optics chopping block after all.
Where is the there there? It is it all vibes, or do people really, truly believe that there is a plan?
And the actual point of the whole post: Would it be possible for such a person to convince me, even if they truly ment, and even if they were right? It's hard to imagine anything but events changing my mind at this point, especially since my fuck around money is too ballin' for the FDIC to handle anymore off of them being wrong so far.
I'm concerned I've fully closed my mind to my opponents here, but I'm also concerned that if I opened it an inch more my brain would fall out.
whenever I see these "I got so rich now i'm retired" posts all can I wonder is not "how do I emulate you" but rather "what is your advise for the mass of peasants with some money to their name who are not you, and cannot become you"
The ability to become wealthier or at least improve one's financial salutation is one of the few things anyone has some control over, unlike talent or traits (e.g. HBD). Anyone can invest in the S&P 500 or not waste money on frivolous purchases.
Sadly, as time goes by, I've become more and more convinced that finance is one of those realms that you either get or you don't, and alot of people - even ones that are highly intelligent in other fields - simply don't.
You just need to get your head straight. It's a game of probabilities. A casino may lose 5 rounds of blackjack in a row, but over the course of a month or a year they rake in the money. One bet or a few bets comes down to chance. A thousand bets? That's never down to chance.
If the results were random, there wouldn't be any consistent winners. But there are. Believing the market moves randomly gives individuals an excuse to not take full responsibility for their own actions and long term results. Those who take responsibility, and review their mistakes regularly and learn from them, will become consistent winners as long as they're willing to keep doing what 90% of people are unwilling to do.
Keep in mind I'm speaking as someone who actually 'gets it'. To a degree.
Maybe I'm expecting to much, but when you're hashing stuff out with an actual medical graduate on managing their college loan payouts and they're more than a little clueless while a friend of mine and I are just going 'No... this is easy', it kind of makes you re-think alot of things.
Granted, you seem to be less talking about financial acumen and more market management strategy. I would say they're a little bit different, and good market management strategy is alot harder than learning finance. IMO, and from my observations.
I’ve heard colleagues grouse about needing to do mathematics when “the reason [they] got into medicine was to get away from maths!” I’ve also seen frankly shocking levels of statistical ignorance in the doctor population.
One thing that stuck with me is an informal experiment a friend of mine did many years ago — he asked a few dozen consultants what a p-value indicates. I think he got a grand total of one correct answer. And these are people who are supposed to be regularly reading (and sometimes writing) academic papers!
That tracks with what I've been told. I've half-joked about somehow finding a medical Doctor Sugar Momma to get married to, in exchange for managing her financials.
The 'somehow' in that sentence is doing alot of heavy lifting, though. Among other things.
To be fair, you probably would be doing a lot of it too, if you managed to wrangle such an arrangement.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Gellmann's amnesia comes to mind (possibly not quite the right term here). Most people have only studied a select few things in any depth at all, but we still assume that the smart doctor will know a lot about many things for some reason. Status and authority confers construals of wider credibility and competence in the observer's head. The actual polymath or renaissance man is rare, it seems.
Do you mean facts and foundational knowledge versus applied action here? Financial acumen = knowing what EPS means and how to read a balance sheet, the difference between price and value, etc etc?
What most people miss is how much of investing is a mental game, requiring an adoption of new beliefs and discarding many old ones. The person born into a family of highly successful investors would know this, while most of the rest of us chumps seem to pick up more misinformation and limiting beliefs than any sort of solid mentoring.
Pretty much. I've seen a bunch of egregious attitudes in regards to, for example, day trading, where alot of people fall into the attitude that they have to trade, despite the market not matching thier models, which turns what should be good tactics into basically betting on the market.
Or, for another example, people who flock in after a boom has occurred, asking if they should invest in your material of choice. (Looking at you, gold.)
Much like in comedy, timing is everything. That's a thing most people think can't be done. They'll parrot platitudes like "time in the market beats timing the market" and talk about how it's basically impossible to do it.
'Sitting out strength' is part of the mental game. I've come to believe that having patience before placing a trade is perhaps even more important than having the patience to wait for the flower to bloom afterwards. Trades are like farts: if you have to force it, it's probably shit.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Are there consistent winners who (1) win consistently with short-term plays; and (2) don't rely on inside information? Based on my limited knowledge that such people are either extremely rare or non-existent.
I do think that there are people who win consistently with long-term plays. With "winning" being defined as either making a good return, like in the neighborhood of 8 percent, or outperforming the market indices in general. By all accounts, people who can consistently outperform the markets in general are very rare, but I am willing to believe that some exist.
People who consistently make money on short term swings? That's something I'm extremely skeptical about. If I hear about a short-term player consistently making money, I think he's either a liar or a cheater. But I'm open to evidence to the contrary.
And by the way, I myself made a bunch of money a few months back on a short term play. I bought QQQ right after it tanked due to a Trump tariff announcement and it seemed obvious that the market had overreacted. I've never tried anything like that before and it paid off very well. But I think that kind of situation is extremely unusual.
I think a strategy of keeping most of your investments in SPY, and then occasionally (every couple of years, but only when a real opportunity presents itself) making strong, reasonable bets during major events where you have high confidence can get you outsized returns (e.g. I almost doubled my net worth during the first couple months of COVID).
The issue is that psychologically, waiting around for those types of events is really boring. And success begets failure, as you really want to start looking for opportunities where your edge is smaller or realistically non-existent.
This seems extremely tempting to me (and in fact I kinda used this strategy) but ultimately I am skeptical. I would worry that inevitably, some small percentage of these "reasonable bets" will turn out disasterously, enough to wipe out the gains and then some. Look at it this way: In order to double your money during the first couple months Covid, it wasn't enough to buy into a general index fund. You had to use options; or buy on margin; or whatever. Which means that even if you were right, you'd still be screwed if your timing was off.
But then again, you may be right, I don't know.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I'd add the qualifier consistent high volume winners.
It's one thing to take a chance where you see one, it's another to produce enough ideas to run a fund.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Probably related to getting math, right?
Before I took my finance courses, I would have told you I was horrible at math.
Now, I'm just convinced that math teachers are horrible at their job.
And worse comes to worse, that's what excel spreadsheets are for.
Math teachers in general are bad at their jobs, because they're people who 'just get it' and don't need much teaching, so they assume everyone else is like that too. The best math teacher I ever had was a seminarian randomly assigned by his superior to teach high school algebra- clearly very intelligent, but had needed to actually study to learn the material.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
You don't need more than arithmetic.
You can't be dumb if you're going to become a consistent winner in the markets. But you don't need to be smart.
Eh, I'd say at least a decent grasp of algebra helps quite a bit
In what situations?
If you have a target retirement (or investment or whatever) amount you need to solve some fairly simple algebra to figure out how much you need to invest per month etc. But I also think algebra is generally useful in a lot of different circumstances and knowing it makes a lot of financial planning easier.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
It takes money to make money, as they say.
More options
Context Copy link
I agree, but it's pretty hard to use that strategy to get to the point where you have "fuck you" money, i.e. enough money so that work is optional. Which makes sense, because having "fuck you" money means you can sit back and live it up while other people work for you. It's logically impossible to be in a situation where anything more than a small minority of the population gets to sit back and live it up while other people work for them.
Basically, for most people it will require (1) being born in a wealthy country; and (2) a lifetime of careful saving and investing.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link