This is the Quality Contributions Roundup. It showcases interesting and well-written comments and posts from the period covered. If you want to get an idea of what this community is about or how we want you to participate, look no further (except the rules maybe--those might be important too).
As a reminder, you can nominate Quality Contributions by hitting the report button and selecting the "Actually A Quality Contribution!" option. Additionally, links to all of the roundups can be found in the wiki of /r/theThread which can be found here. For a list of other great community content, see here.
These are mostly chronologically ordered, but I have in some cases tried to cluster comments by topic so if there is something you are looking for (or trying to avoid), this might be helpful.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I don’t see apex in this, simply because so much of what trans women seem to think the interior life experiences of women are the things that the media tells people that women are like. It would be like me taking men’s media portrayals as what men are like. If I say I’m a man and I act like the media portrayals of male action heroes maybe like John Wick or something, you’d find the effect rather weird because this isn’t what any men are like. I don’t think John Wick in the wild is super high status, but he’s the character people think of when they think about maleness.
I'd absolutely say that John Wick is super high status, even before you account for the fact that he's, in-universe, famous as the assassin that makes other world-class assassins shit their pants. Ie even if he were some "everyday" assassin with just enough assassination skills not to be killed on the job, he'd be super high status. Men and women who are protagonists in fictional works are almost never very low status and often very high status, and even the very low status ones, like, say, Forrest Gump, are exceptional in a way that makes them relatively high status compared to similar people - it's exactly their exceptionality that makes the fictional story worth telling, because a loser being mopey and suffering and then dying without ever making anyone's life any better, including their own, is a really boring story.
But more to the point, perhaps you can argue that "apex" is the wrong term, and I would probably agree with that argument. It's a very broad "apex" being used to describe the slice of people in that genre who are high status enough to be noticeable. Which is probably like 40-70% among men and 60-90% among women, by my completely unevidenced speculation. In that bottom 10-40% of women are the women who aren't noticed by men, and I'd wager that women who are less traditionally feminine are more highly represented within that bottom slice. So if you build your vision of what a typical feminine woman's life is like while ignoring that slice, you end up with a vision that's, among other things, more feminine than the reality. I think a lot of transwomen combine that with some other pathologies to end up believing what they do about what being a woman is like.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link