domain:forecasting.substack.com
ThisIsSin
PC is for progressive-conservative
22hr ago
If that is not "proof of Bad Nazi" to you, what is?
Is Hitler in the room with us right now?
Look. The reason communists hate fascists is because the driving impulse behind both are identical except for who, whom. It's bikeshedding.
The reason Germany and Italy went one way and Russia and China went the other is simply due to which gender role [gender is too reductive in the face of mechanization] found itself in oversupply relative to its output given the technological conditions at the time. Working class men were in undersupply in the former nations, and in oversupply in the latter (sometimes called the 'unneccessariat').
That is why communism usually goes full civil war mass murder dependent on the poverty of the nation, whereas fascism does not need to. (That's not a guarantee it won't, of course, but since when have dictatorships- including communism/fascism, which is the dictatorship of the working class- ever really been rational?)
faceh
22hr ago
being aggressively, overtly racist isn't quite socially acceptable yet.
Uhhh it certainly is if you're from an oppressed demographic and directing it against an oppressor demographic, as framed by the left.
Skeletor
22hr ago
I was going to post a reply of my own but I think I'll just updoot this one.
Skeletor
22hr ago
…did you ever?
Who the fuck are you to say otherwise? Back before the blue team made being racist against me hip and tried to get my niece to cut her tits off, I was a Daily Show watching Dem-voting asshole internet atheist. Now when the thing that side has become comes calling, wearing its little civil rights skin suit, to tell me how so-and-so said some no-no words, I just snuggle in among all the Jesus freaks and right wing dickheads I used to think of as my enemies and say, well, at least they weren't aimed at me.
Thanks for asking.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
22hr ago
Liberalism is not a dictatorship of the working class; liberalism is a codified cease-fire between groups that naturally seek to become dictatorships to let them exploit their resource surplus
That's the Superbowl ad of liberalism that it purchases to try to sell itself. What liberalism actually is, is a silent conspiracy of lizardmen to sell you for a slave, while pretending this is what you wanted all along.
hydroacetylene
22hr ago
Paxton is probably the third most influential Republican politician in Texas nationally at most- Abbott and Cruz at least beat him, and there’s an argument that Dan Patrick does too.
hydroacetylene
22hr ago
is neonazism, support of slavery, and unabashed bigotry such as this actually common among young conservatives as Hanania and the group chat themselves seem to believe?
No. Well, not really- opposition to involvement in WWII/stalin was the worse evil than Hitler is very common. Mildly antisemitic views on Israeli influence are very common. Opposition to women’s suffrage is common. HBD is fairly common.
Gas chambers and support for Hitler and slavery is just edgy humor.
JarJarJedi
22hr ago
Something like:
V9135XA: Hit or struck by a falling object due to an accident in a canoe or kayak
I'm sure is a lot of fun to marvel at, but working with this system practically might be challenging... "So you say you were struck in the head by a falling object, my first medical question would be - were you per chance in a kayak at the time? How about a canoe?"
Southkraut
The rain fell gentlier.
22hr ago
"I love Hitler" seems about as literal Nazi as possible.
If serious, then it's proof of LARP.
If that is not "proof of Bad Nazi" to you, what is?
Nothing anymore. I'm in agreement with @KMC. Nazi is a meaningless term nowadays. Back when there was an actual nazi party, you could be a nazi. For a few years after the war, with a network of your old nazi buddies, you could maybe claim to be a nazi. But by now, the term has lost its original meaningful application, and anyone even actively claiming to be a nazi is a joke. Anyone claiming that someone else, someone else who has not just woken up from an 80-year slumber, is a nazi, is either historically ignorant or just complete indifferent. The word nazi, in the 2020s is, and I am very serious about this, nothing but a signal, a target painter, a LASER designator meant to point out POLITICALLY BAD GUY.
Show me the modern nazi. Point him out. And explain to me what it is that makes him a nazi, the true heir to a label that described one political movement and its adherents in 1920s and 1930s Germany, who made up their ideology as they went along. And why that label fits better than "trolling LARPer".
Amelia Earhart is a very good suggestion. I think my criteria would be pre-1950, not a DEI exaggeration of her accomplishments, non-political, not the wife of a more famous man as that’s a bit demeaning. Earhart has a nice feminist aspect, with bravery and technical competence. I would nominate these:
Laura Ingalls Wilder as kind of a stand-in for the bravery and hard work of women on the frontier, as well as their literary contributions.
Lilian Gish representing women in entertainment/Hollywood. Though maybe her involvement in Birth of a Nation disqualifies her. However, importantly Gish was gorgeous, and would make for beautiful money.
Emily Dickinson representing women’s contribution to literature, especially poetry.
Maybe Grandma Moses?
My issue is all of these feel sort of DEI. Why Earhart and not Lindbergh? Why Dickinson and not Whitman? Why Gish and not Chaplin? I guess Wilder would be my top choice followed by Gish, but more as emblematic of women on the frontier than her specifically.
ThisIsSin
PC is for progressive-conservative
23hr ago
That's just communism calling itself liberalism. It's the equivalent of a nation calling itself a "Democratic Republic" when it is in fact neither of those things.
Liberalism is not a dictatorship of the working class; liberalism is a codified cease-fire between groups that naturally seek to become dictatorships to let them exploit their resource surplus (this is distinct from monarchy and oligarchy, where in those cases the benefits of that resource surplus can be easily captured by a limited number of actors- liberalism self-establishes when that is not possible).
Once that surplus runs out, including for hedonic treadmill reasons, people turn their attention back to reforming those dictatorships.
thrownaway24e89172
Death is the inevitable and only true freedom
23hr ago
So two adults coordinating a child porn ring is acceptable as long as it's done in private? Might need to walk back your literally nothing claim here.
Yes. Why wouldn't it be? They'd still obviously be liable for creation/distribution/possession of the child porn itself so there's no need to crack down on mere "coordination" other than an authoritarian desire to sneak in more control over private speech in general.
netstack
Texas is freedom land
23hr ago
Eh, it’s possible. People here are unusually likely to pass that sort of Turing test.
And I don’t disagree that the bottom, so to speak, has fallen out. There are a lot of people who are feeling more afraid, alienated, polarized. What they aren’t feeling is vindication. That’s something you get from people who were already thinking about a CW model.
JarJarJedi
23hr ago
The reverse side should have the picture of the autopen.
VoxelVexillologist
Multidimensional Radical Centrist
23hr ago
This reads a lot like the "50 Stalins" dialog, and I at least see a plausible reading where "That would be Hitler" is rhetorically "No, 50 Stalins!" in a way that is pointing out the extremism of one's own side.
I guess it depends on how earnestly "Hitler" is supposed to be taken here, or if it's a clearly-over-the-top suggestion. Still relatively unprofessional for such an organizational forum, though.
WhiningCoil
Ghost of Quokka's Future
23hr ago
Do you believe that all of politics can only be summed up as "left" and "right" and that it is impossible to be both against killing people like Kirk and against racism/neonazism/etc?
Yes.
Let me put it like this. When a high profile Jan 6 defendant gets tenure at a major university, and becomes the mentor to the next president, I might be willing to entertain the notion that I have enemies to the right. If the town my daughter is growing up in doesn't flip from 80% white to 30% white over her lifetime like mine did, I might be willing to entertain that I have enemies to the right. If I can look up resumes in my field and not see that 50% of them have some variation of "we prioritize hiring diversity", I might be willing to entertain that I have enemies to the right.
But my life has been made so infinitely worse by my enemies to the left, I don't understand why I could possibly care about these theoretical enemies to my right. They've literally never done anything to me.
JarJarJedi
23hr ago
In July, I did my routine vitals checkup, and got some bad news. High glucose levels (110), high HA1C (5.7), abnormal lipids and liver function tests. Of these, the glucose part has been most worrying, since I have genetic predisposition to diabetes duer to family history, and that's not fun. I talked to the doctor and he said basically you can lose weight or we can give you a bunch of pills, your choice. So, I decided to take some measures to reduce my weight and sugar intake and see how much it can more the needle. What I have done:
- I've been eating pretty cleanly already, but I excluded all added sugar products pretty much completely
- I stopped all snacking, unless it's nuts, cheese or beef jerky, and only do those 1-2 times a day in small quantities
- Stopped all sweets altogether (with rare occasional exceptions like birthday, etc.) including no sugary fruit
- Stopped all high-carb foods - no bread, pasta, etc.
- No alcohol (again, with rare exceptions like birthday or social occasion with friends - which came out no more than once a month)
- Made an IF routine where I only eat anything between 10am and 8pm, outside of it I only drink water or tea
- Exercise routine - at least 3 gym days (15 mins cardio, then 45 mins to an hour resistance training) plus 1hr martial arts 2 times a week
- In addition to that, walk with the dog 45-1hr daily
This wasn't very hard to maintain - I am missing the sweets a bit, but otherwise I just needed to be a little more organized and regular with what I was already doing. Just required to keep in mind and reminding myself that I need to keep to the routine. It does include eating less varied diet than I used to and forgo some culinary pleasures, but it doesn't become intolerable (fortunately, my wife is a good cook and is very supportive).
This week, after 3 months of this routine, I got the new tests. The glucose is back into acceptable range, HA1C is 5.4 - well within normal range, liver function normal, lipids are still abnormal but much better than before. And I lost 20 pounds. I am happy with the result and plan to continue with the same regimen with another 3 months, and get my weight close to my ideal range (which requires losing another 10-15 pounds). After which I plan to slowly relax the routine and re-introduce some stuff like occasional bread or fruit and see if I can maintain the lower weight while allowing some more tricky items in - my wife is also a good baker, so some temptations are definitely there. So far I'm optimistic about this.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
23hr ago
Liberalism is what a dictatorship of the working class looks like when it goes through gender affirming care.
ThisIsSin
PC is for progressive-conservative
23hr ago
Fascism is what a dictatorship of the working class looks like when it forgets to invite any women.
Communism is what a dictatorship of the working class looks like when it forgets to invite any men.
NewCharlesInCharge
23hr ago
Okay, how about composing and performing a song about it being springtime for Hitler?
professorgerm
clutching my imitation pearls
23hr ago
the ones who were already jumping at the bit.
It is interesting to see it potentially developing as the last straw for a lot of people, where a passive lack of charity crosses into something more active.
Once, I did care, but I burned out before this. I don't really consider the right "my side" in an affirmative sense, but my anti-leftness solidified sometime during the whole "whiteness is the source of all evil but technically doesn't mean white people wink wink nudge nudge" era of egregious bigotry.
This is not good for society, and it's definitely not good for my intellectual charity when talking to whatever infinitesimal fraction of the left refused to tolerate that shit, but I don't really feel like the ball is in my court for solving it, either. For all my many flaws and failures, I've never declared an ethnicity a contract with the devil, or tried to create high-minded academic fig leaves for virulent racism.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
23hr ago
Yeah, as with a lot of things Jewish, there's two kinds of people who use the noun "Jew" to refer to a Jewish person -- neo-Nazis and Jews.
(OK maybe boomers too)
YoungAchamian
23hr ago
It's water under the bus.
I don't think the USSR was a particularly feminised society. Blue-haired feminists may consider themselves communist, they may even be communists, but they definitely haven't established Socialism in One Country.
More options
Context Copy link