domain:abc.net.au
Look through the adult section of downmagaz.net. Assuming that only the most popular titles are uploaded there the big brands are still going and there seem to be plenty of niches being served too.
While it hurt me deep in my soul to praise MS, compared to most of the walled gardens which have popped up since 2000, the PC is a rather open platform. Anyone can develop and distribute any game, no matter how disturbing or distasteful."Windows Defender has prevented the execution of Holocaust Simulator 3000.exe because it violates the PC content policy" is not a thing that happens.
Yeah, it's actually worse than that. Go on a retro journey and you'll find so many files that Windows Defender tries to block. Old official game patches, mods, cd-cracks. Now I'm told the cd-cracks are false positives, but I judge the sketchiness of gamecopyworld's array of mirrors not worth the risk. Side note, I can't believe gamecopyworld still exist, virtually unchanged from the early 00's.
Other prominent women in politics, including Michelle Obama and Kamala Harris, have faced these kinds of “secretly transgender” social media campaigns, the Wilson Center noted in a 2021 report on the “deeply misogynistic” trend. “These narratives tap into the trope of the duplicitous woman, implying that not only are transgender individuals inherently deceptive, but that this deception is responsible for the power and influence that these women hold,” the report said.
Another instance of “heads I win, tails you lose” feminist victimology. Calling a woman manly is misogynistic. Calling a man womanly would also be misogynistic. I imagine there is some jiu-jistsu or just-so story one can deploy to creatively yes_chad.jpg it.
The lives of peaceful Israeli Arabs are on average some of the best in the region.
They have denied most people living their citizenship. People are banned from living on the land the family has lived on for generations.
Why should they sign a peace deal with a country that wants 70+ of the land and with a country that is attacking all its neighbours? It is a concession with nothing to gain.
Has it? Have the Palestinians acted in any way that is significantly different from any other group? They are not really doing anything to different from any other insurgency.
My first thought was that she's being sued in Delaware, and in the United States, unlike Europe, truth is an absolute defense against slander and defamation. So getting a medical exam on record is likely to be Candace Owen's first order of business, and then it's over one way or the other.
Modern problems require Roman solutions.
You can't read history without coming across the names of long extinct tribes. It might be an exaggeration to say they were all genocided, many merely had their cultural identity destroyed through enslavement and conquest. All the same, there are no Etruscans, Gauls, Picts, Carthaginians, Trojans, and probably countless tribes, states and empires in regions without a written history. Imagine, for a moment, if they were all still among us, waging their 2000 year old grievances over minuscule patches of barren land the way Israel and Palestine are. Imagine if we were still arbitrating between extant Etruscans and Romans possession of the land north of the Tiber over a 3000 year history?
I won't claim some ability to arbitrate when, where or why genocide is necessary. But if you really think of a world without it, it's terrifying.
Why? The Western public seems okay-ish with killing of Alawites and Druze in Syria.
far greater chance
Might this be a distinction without a difference.
If Hamas have a sufficiently low probability of success doubling, tripling or even 10 x, while a greater chance is still very, very low in absolute terms.
Palestine, unlike Lebanon, would be ethnically pure. The Christians are mostly gone, there wasn’t a large Shia population to begin with.
Yes. Israël is a wealthy country and can pay cash for their weapons.
I mean didn't he literally just get purged for expressing a political opinion?
He doesn't have to read about authoritarian states, he's already living in one!
EDIT: Well that comment didn't last long. Here's the original:
I didn't watch the entire Mehdi Hasan Jubilee video but wanted to comment on that one guy who was fired after he said "yeah I'm a fascist".
After this, Hasan asks if he's afraid this imagined regime might come after his one day. He says no because he'd be part of the aristocracy that the regime comes from. These spoiled children of democracy have no ida what the hell they're talking about. All authoritarian regimes are full of paranoia about who's going after who. And that ruling class is the most heavily policed. They get purged. Your unwavering commitment to the state's ideology might be your best asset one day and your biggest liability the next. I beg any of these people to read a book by someone who grew up in an authoritarian state.
From the article:
These outlandish, defamatory, and far-fetched fictions included that Mrs Macron was born a man, stole another person’s identity, and transitioned to become Brigitte
That another person is her brother Jean-Michel Trogneux who supposedly disappeared but in fact transitioned.
Ive read 'Gaza is starving' since 2023 end Oct. Hell I've seen that headline since 2013. First time I've seen starvation cause population expansion.
This IMO places them solidly on the "insect" side of the perceptivity + reactivity spectrum.
What you are saying is just wrong. It is wrong for the reason that nobody is harnessing the intellectual skills of orangutans or insects to produce billions of dollars in revenue. We do not see monkeys on typewriters functioning in the workplace. If AI truly were unintelligent, then nobody would be using it for commercial processes like writing code. Not in a 'search engine/autocorrect' way like normal software but a 'here is what I want, do this, fix this error I see, that looks bad change it to this' way like one would work with a human. That alone is sufficient to disprove what you're saying.
You have more credentials than me. But I don't need credentials to be right and credentials cannot save you from being wrong. It just isn't the case that an orangutan is smarter than Grok. If an orangutan were smarter than Grok then why wouldn't we be breeding them for intellectual labour? Why aren't there any Ape Intelligence engineers?
There's an important kind of intelligence that apes lack but LLMs possess. This isn't something up for debate, the market has already decided and the decision is final.
This limited context window is also why if you actually try to play a game of chess with Chat GPT it will forget the board-state and how pieces move after a few turns and promptly lose to a computer program written in 1976.
the ability to fill a page with text is indicates the ability to perceive and react to a changing situation is an example of anthropomorphic bias
OK, how well does the orangutan do at Chess then? Or filling a page with text? Shall we compare like to like?
Imagine you see a military commentator saying that the Ugandan military is stronger than the American military. It's obviously wrong, right? But he makes the case that the US military has all these problems, lost against the Taliban and militias in Iraq, procurement is very poor, ships crash at sea and burn down at port, there's a drug and suicide crisis. The Pentagon is constantly being hacked and secrets are stolen. Ugandan ships don't crash at sea! Uganda hasn't lost a single strategic bomber because of bad weather. So on balance, the Ugandan military is stronger.
But Uganda doesn't have a navy, it's landlocked. Uganda doesn't have any strategic bombers to lose. The Ugandan military doesn't have any secrets worth stealing. The whole argument isn't valid, the US losing some aircraft is bad but they can also do so much that Uganda cannot. They are on a completely different level in size and sophistication. Turns out it was just obviously wrong.
The orangutan is nowhere near Grok 4. It's ridiculous to compare them. Grok can produce meaningful, useful text. People get it to write out smut for them, summarize articles, write code, answer hypothetical questions, decrypt codes, do advanced mathematics, assess nuclear strategy... It and other modern LLMs have a degree of intellectual generality that far surpasses calculators and chess programs that might beat them at a few specific tasks. Why would we want an LLM to do excellent mental arithmetic when it could just call a tool instead?
LLMs are intelligent. Their intelligence is flawed in some significant respects but it is intelligence nonetheless. This is a critical point that underlies trillions of dollars in market capitalization. It is the difference between Deep Blue's relative irrelevance and ChatGPT's great significance. Paths to ASI are still up for debate but if you cannot get the basics right it's hard to see why your opinions about superintelligence should hold any weight.
Have you seen the SSC post on anorexia?
https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/04/26/anorexia-and-metabolic-set-point/
I keep talking about the Arab telegram channels that livestreamed slaughter of children to heart eyes and cheers, but it really just seems to be screaming into the void here. Azzam Pasha can declare his intent to slaughter jews, Hamas charter calls to slaughter jews, Quran 5:51 and Bukharin 2925 explicitly call for the distrust and killing of Jews, the list of attacks against Jews in mandatory Palestine is a long chronology of terrorism, Arab states expelled jews and confiscated property the moment Israel was created, but its the Jews who are the evil ones.
No one cares about the Yazidi or Armenians or Copts because they were successfully extinguished as viable populations by muslims. Justice is not the objective, fulfilling the demand for a Recurring Bad Guy like a saturday morning villain matters. Bin Laden and al-Baghdadi are dead so no one cares about islamic terrorism. Wait that example doesn't work Jalani is alive and Bedouin slaughter of Druze is ignored. Islamic fundamentalism exploits the meta of sympathy where grievance is automatically legitimate and self defense is oppression when successful recompense when not.
I still stand by the claim that AOT is very good! I would expect that, past the age of 5, no red-blooded boy would be negatively affected by any of the themes of the story. Jurassic Park has many a person being eaten by titanic dinosaurs, and it's a fan favorite in that age group.
At 16? If he can't handle it, you need to roll him up in bubble-wrap to avoid the risk to his glass bones. He'll be fine, and you should watch it yourself.
Ghibli is amazing, and they're all so different. I've no qualms with Ghibli.
My youngest boy was watching Attack on Titan the other day. I was watching in horror as what I assumed was the hero was... eaten. This continued several times until I asked what was up, not wanting to be that dad who just lets his kids watch anything. Apparently my older boy had seen the entire series, and explained to me various spoiler things I won't reveal, but in general I was left with a rather empty desolate feeling and wondered where the hell I had been when my oldest (now 16) had been bingeing the series. I'd probably also have watched it back when younger, but the arc of that story is not exactly an upper.
I agree that criticism of your writing seems a lot more personal when you make your writing your job. But I'd go further and add there's also an element in the lifecycle where some of these people made their writing about themselves- specifically their own moral self-perception- and that criticism stings all the more when you publicly fail to meet your own publicly espoused ethics.
I don't remember ymeskhout burning out, but the other two at least had high-profile moments where they failed to meet the standards they claimed, and then rather clearly disliked that standard being held against them. When you make an unequivocable moral standard about why others are wrong to act in a certain way, and then equivocate about it when you do it yourself, the substack paywall becomes a the most generous sort of affirmation. On the other hand, a diverse audience of many contradicting and even disagreeable views who will scorn your self-image of yourself as a morally superior person for free.
On the other hand, you have an audience that is largely composed of people who like you and your position enough to give you money.
Candance Owens was a hot star in conservative commentariat - a black well spoken conservative woman. She built her own following then was also part of Shapiro's Daily Wire until they went their separate way after conflict about Jews/Israel after October 7.
As for what is happening - did you ever crack some edgy jokes in your friend group, maybe something like "Hitler did nothing wrong" etc. only to find out that this one guy actually took it literally and did not get it as a joke? That is Canace Owens for you when it comes to some of her stuff including Obama/Macron being transgender. It is a meme going on way back like when Joan Rivers offhandedly had a remark that Michelle is a tranny.
Large portion of Christians? The Gaza Christian population is about a tenth of a percent (potentially something to do with how the locals have historically treated members of other religions). Israel's population is about a sixth Islamic, who for the most part live in conditions a bit worse than the Jews but still rich, affluent, educated and healthy compared to the rest of the Middle East.
The Israelis have been holding the wolf by the ears for 77 years and it looks like they are shifting the hands to the neck. I understand their position: they sincerely believe than any bargain with the Palestinians will only be a stepping point to the final item on the list:
- recognition of Palestine as a sovereign state
- two states with the borders drawn by Israel
- two states with 1968 borders
- two states with 1947 UN borders
- two states with Peel commission borders
- single state with the Jews owning only the land they actually bought
- Arab state with the Jews owning only the land they actually bought but not having citizenship
- Arab state with the Jews not owning shit
- Arab state without the Jews
The real problem is that no one is willing to step up and threaten to glass the country that will violate the peace terms first. This means both Israel and Palestine are completely free to defect, unlike Yugoslavs in B&H.
Isn't that pretty much what they're doing now?
More options
Context Copy link