site banner
Advanced search parameters (with examples): "author:quadnarca", "domain:reddit.com", "over18:true"

Showing 25 of 8111 results for

domain:nfinf.substack.com

I kind of feel that there’s a recent crop of writers who actually suffer the opposite problem: no romance at all, ever. Which feels very… inhuman? The human experience is such that at least some kind of attraction is bound to come up in any developed world covering any significant stretch of time. Even more so for teen protagonists, but hardly exclusively. So it feels weird when these stories don’t bother, either, possibly because writing good romance is admittedly at least a little difficult.

As an example there’s a very noticeable divide in the manga/manhua world between boy audience and girl audience fictions. It’s increasingly common that the guy oriented ones either play the typical harem-flirty route, where everyone is interested but the main character never commits, or increasingly never being it up at all, focusing on other power fantasy aspects or simply going all in on visuals and violence. Depressing, really, that commitment is so rare, and that many relationships (even friendships) are either one-way, or trivialized with no real conflict.

The landlord fears the outdoor (or indoor) chicken farmer.

They're not - the sort of total, top-down mobilization of the economy that characterized the World Wars is fairly unusual. But leaving that aside, these economic arrangements were not intended to be welfare improving for the people living in them.

There's more to it than just geography--why are they mostly concentrated? Anyone who wasn't fully on-board with the religion in the 1840s, and willing to give up everything for it, would have stayed behind when they were kicked out of the state.

The result is possibly the most powerful religious selection effect ever. The only comparable effect I can think of is the early Christian church, when converts understood they faced pretty high odds of being executed for their faith if they converted.

It's also much harder to be a lukewarm Mormon than, say, Catholic. Our doctrine is much newer, our church much smaller, and there's far less room to say basically "sure maybe it's all just metaphorical but I like what it teaches my kids" when the Book of Mormon's very origin must be either literally true and from God, or a deliberate scam. (Arguably, other Christian churches are the same, but at least their "scams" were thousands of years ago.)

As a responsible, frugal, young, male driver witnessing the Decline of America, I would be utterly fucked without UMPD coverage, which is extremely valuable and necessary so I don't have to empty my emergency fund every time someone's juvenile delinquent runs a red light; but Collision and Comprehensive are just plain negative-value since their premiums have to be high enough to include the amortized cost of said delinquent replacing his own car also. (Before you ask: Liability is its own thing; I don't mind paying for that.)

I've contacted 5+ insurers trying to purchase an auto insurance package that includes UMPD without Collision, and they all alleged that Alabama bans the sale of UMPD-without-Collision. Most also claimed that Alabama is nearly unique in this.

However, I couldn't find any such law on the books, or any historic arguments/rationale behind the (alleged) Alabama status quo.

What the fuck am I missing? And what due diligence should I do before I start trying to get my state rep to fix this shit?

In fact thé worst gerrymanders in terms of the difference between popular vote percentages and congressional results are in Oregon and Illinois, a complication for the ‘evil republicans’ narrative.

That's not an especially good metric (though people understandably like to focus on it because it's legible); crucially, it is also not correct. MA, for example, saw Republicans get a little over a third of presidential votes* but precisely zero seats. In Iowa, Democrats got 43% of the presidential vote, but zero seats. Astute observers will note that neither of these states are actually gerrymandered, which perhaps illustrates why that metric is suboptimal.

The metric people who study gerrymandering have converged on for measuring partisan bias is performance relative to other maps that could have been drawn. In MA, for example, it would be very difficult to draw a map where the GOP got a third of the seats simply because of how Republican voters are distributed around the state. Iowa could potentially be better, but not by much.

By those standards, Texas is on-par to a little worse than Illinois.

And, of course, none of this addresses the elephant in the room, which is how the parties have, on the whole, tried to resolve the problem of gerrymandering. Democrats have repeatedly sought a nationwide solution, while Republicans have preferred a "gerrymandering for me but not for thee" approach.

*Using presidential votes as a proxy for general support is imperfect but better than statewide tally of legislative races because many House races are unopposed.

If the government is going to give out industrial subsidies, why not get something in return?

In the case of US Steel, the government didn't give out subsidies, it simply demanded a payoff for approving the deal.

More generally, it's not philosophically coherent. If the USG expected to get a stake in exchange for subsidies, the most of the South and Midwest would be government property. The general pattern the US has followed is that it may offer subsidies or very favorable lending terms (which amount to subsidies) for things the government wants to promote, but hasn't insisted on receiving partial ownership. Partly this because Americans (and especially Republicans) have traditionally been averse to state ownership, but also partly because subsidies are not generally conceived of as business investments but the state paying you to do something it wants. The CHIPS Act was not the USG dipping its toes in the market to make a little money, it was promoting the development of domestic chip production.

They made the new movies on a crazy timeline. A new movie of the trilogy every two years.

The first final drafts of scripts where due before there was a final cut of the previous movie.

Obviously doing something like that requires careful planning. Naturally they did no planning.

The first movie copied all of the beats of ANH. The second movie is supposed to set up the final conflict of the third movie.

Then Rian Johnson came in for the second and did his own thing. He either ignored or was possibly never aware of some of the things the first movie set up. He killed off The Big Bad / Chessmaster (Snoke) and promoted the Dragon (Kylo Ren) to be the new Big Bad.

Some people liked how it subverted their expectations, but it subverted the arc of the series.

For the third movie they had no villain with a grand plan, no idea where character's stories were supposed to go, and Bob Iger wouldn't budge on the timeline. It had to be out xmas 2019.

That sounds very much like Let This Grieving Soul Retire!: Woe Is the Weakling Who Leads the Strongest Party, which got an anime adaption last year. It's not cultivation though, just Japanese light-novel/webnovel fantasy.

As far as I can recall, you're correct. The fact that the law necessitates grouping minorities (blacks) into their own districts was started to prevent Southern states from chopping up the districts to give blacks 0 representation, but now it's a net-negative for Dems since it basically forces Dem voters to be inefficiently allocated.

Look at this dataset.

The other problem for democrats in an all out gerrymandering war is that they simply have fewer seats to eek out. The most gerrymandered states in the union are all blue; red states going tit for tat isn't actually something they can escalate that much against.

This isn't true. This dataset shows 4 different metrics of "fairness", and in every single one of them it's shown that Republicans are doing more gerrymandering today than Dems. Both sides could become even more crappy about this in the future if they wanted to, and we're probably going to see that happen unfortunately. It's not particularly hard to find states where Dems could increase their outcome by a lot, e.g. if they did North Carolina-level gerrymandering in New York it could easily amount to several seats.

Where else do you think the Kirk x Bones shipping came from?

Gundam and Star Trek had rabid female fanbase?

Gardening or light landscaping.

Raising chickens, if your zoning allows.

DIY home improvement projects that aren't structurally critical. Teach the kids how the permitting systems works (partially serious there).

If you have trees, you can install a small zipline.

Treehouse, or a similar small construction project that they can then manage and maintain. My friend had his kids build an aquaponics system and they could grow whatever they wanted in it (aside from weed).

In order to write seriously about religion, you probably have to believe seriously in religion. Given that Mormons are mostly in a small concentrated area of the US I would be unsurprised that a lot higher percentage of Mormons seriously believe than other religions.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/09/style/westminster-preview-golden-retrievers.html

Very important story. It makes me realize how hard I fell for the little Golden my family got while I'm away in Scotland.

There's probably a worthwhile discussion there, right?

Sanderon, Card, Correia, and Meyer are all Mormons. Now as it happens I don't count Mormons as Christians, but that aside - it is interesting that all these examples are from the same religion. Are Mormons in general punching well above their weight in science fiction and genre spaces?

She wrote a vampire romance story where the main characters waited until marriage. In fact the entire story seems to be built on top of resisting the temptation to sleep together before then; Edward's bloodlust an obvious metaphor for actual lust.

There are some other connections--the eternal youthful marriage, the vampires from Rome possibly representing Catholics, the idea that you need to develop and grow as a person as much as you can before becoming immortal--but those are all stretches.

Sanderson's works deal much more explicitly with religion, but I'd argue his most important religious themes are also subtextual. For example, Mistborn has the explicit themes with Sazed, but the entire story is built around the implicit themes--the Lord Ruler is a false hero, and Ruin can alter any scripture not written on metal, leading to doctrinal decay over time. Elantris is built around the exact same theme, actually; the magic used to work but people forgot why, so when the underlying fundamentals changed it stopped working.

All the explicit dealings with gods are pretty lackluster in comparison, and arguably not really "religious" at all. The Percy Jackson books had that.

Dirigism with retarded characteristics.

[ With sincere apologies to Deng Xiaoping ]

Blood+. The main character has multiple love interests (sort of) but the story is both intensely focused on her attachments to the world in general (brothers, father, friends and other more spoilery ones) and an excellent globe-trotting thriller.

I only read part of it, but I believe Beware of Chicken was initially aiming to be something similar. It's not exactly the described trope - rather than "clueless initiate stumbles into a position of being feared/respected" it's "young rising star decides to get out of the game and run a farm but attracts weirdness which he then disarms with his unusual mindset" (with IIRC isekai possession justifying the initial dropout) - but it has a similar theme of people misunderstanding the MC because they don't know what's actually motivating his choices.

I got the impression that as it went on it got more centered on standard cultivation, though.

Sort of... it was ultimately the grandma's misunderstanding of the magic's source/purpose that created the anxieties that led to the magic not working anymore, but it was this abstract anxiety that was the antagonist rather than an outright malevolent force. The only stakes for the magic not working were that the magic was cool and it would be sad for it to not work. To me, actualization/fulfillment is a perfectly good goal for a story.

Property was cheap, food expensive. A doctor they knew was said to spend an incredible amount of money on food, and we're talking groceries, not dining out.

When my father was growing up, chicken costed as much as steak. And not because steak was cheap! They hadn’t really invented intensive farming.

I keep seeing The Vorkorsigan Saga pop up in recommendations.

I gave the Warrior's Apprentice a shot, but Miles spends so much of it moping around the house not doing anything. Can you recommend one of the other books that's friendlier to someone with a short attention span who isn't that interested in hearing about the main character's family members?