site banner
Advanced search parameters (with examples): "author:quadnarca", "domain:reddit.com", "over18:true"

Showing 25 of 2018 results for

domain:doyourownresearch.substack.com

At least in the UK, things were kept reasonably orderly in part because the police were usually local and knew everybody, and because they were freer to make assumptions about who was up to no good.

When you have to apply the laws completely equally and show no evidence of prejudice, the laws are going to have to get a lot more onerous and specific.

Adults doing productive things like filming little girls who ask them to go away?

Police sources have also confirmed there is no evidence to support the online rumours Mr Dumana is a migrant or committed any offence.

He's only been in the UK 4 years by the article's own admission, but somehow 'not a migrant'. Does he have PR or citizenship? The article only says he has legally been in country for 4 years. I would consider any first generation immigrant to be a migrant.

Anyway, I'm now thinking the girl started it, because apparently the cops reviewed footage from a nearby shop and there was a witness (presumably not his wife, but this article is maddeningly imprecise so who knows):

'They saw from the CCTV cameras from Farmfoods that she was stopping me go on my way to the shop.

'There was one more person also who told them (the police) she was attacking me and calling me a f***** migrant.

You joke, but I’ve known some very brown farm labourers. 60 years of all-day tanning with do a lot. Though they were Japanese and not super-pale to start with.

I don't have anything to add about Fuentes irrelevance besides what everyone else has already said, I wanted however to comment on this:

Expect the Republican consensus on Israel to crack at least a little bit over the coming decades, again thanks to the Groypers.

I think the opposite is more likely to happen. Yes, it's true that the boomer evangelical constituency will die off in the next decade and they were rabidly pro-israel. However the rest of the republican base is more or less indifferent to this question, the pockets of antisemitism are truly small. OTOH in the Democratic party Hassan (who is actually influent, unlike Fuentes) can go full anti-zionist and face no repercussions, anti-zionism and even anti-semitism make a lot of sense within the internal logic of progressivism (jews are a market dominating, overrepresented, minority, black people hate them because they screw over rappers and israel is the last colonialist project) and disliking palestinans makes a lot of sense on the right.

If europe didn't exists you'd maybe have a chance to keep muslims as a fargroup and push the "muslims are actually based" idea through but I the european right is going to make available to many examples of muslims being non-based for that to be possible.

I think what's more likely to happen is that one of the democratic candidates will eventually break anti-zionist and the the republican party will either consolidate into pro-israel as a reflex or at best remain indifferent.

For your prediction to come true the relationship between israel and palestine needs to normalize and stay normal for a long time.

I used to be Caucasian before being exposed to the merciless heat of the Caledonian countryside?

Yeah but he's very firm on trying to escape India (for a myriad of justified reasons inclusive of locals)

s per the link from jkf, the dude is a """digital creator"""... The only thing left to find out is if he's working for an NGO.

Thanks for the link I hadn't scrolled. Oh my. Well, if that's the case I suppose the blackpill doesn't taste so bad going down.

Because girls don't know a lot about intimidation. Not even on the streets.

I'm saying: not even trying, not trying and failing.

I am suspicious of all short videos.

As per the link from jkf, the dude is a """digital creator""". This video is short, because that's how he wanted it, which means he's hiding something. The quotes in the paper make him sound like OJ Simpson.

I'm calling it / doubling down: the whole thing is fake. She's not Braveheart, and he's not a poor migrant targeted by racist chavettes, which is what this video was originally meant to show, but backfired. The only thing left to find out is if he's working for an NGO.

Shoot man, I was just there yesterday, I woulda met up. I had a good time wandering the High Line in Manhattan. If you care about architecture it's basically a site seeing tour for that. There's a great quality yet cheap Japanese place called KENKA on Saint Marks Place. $7 for a bowl of hearty ramen and $7 for a 20oz bottle of beer with good vibes. Otherwise don't forget to check out central park. It really does live up to the hype.

Well, that made me curious.

Bulgaria has about 50% higher GDP per capita than Mexico. Similar inequality, and slightly human development index too.

I'm guessing it's plainly incorrect, since I don't see any room for a nuanced take in the face of those numbers.

brown people.

I thought @self_made_human was brown people(*)!

(*) The good kind of course.

Wait, were you using a generic "you"?

That is utterly bizarre. Were they overprotective dads? Or were they actually just complete randos?

She doesn't look like she's even trying to be intimidating

Because girls don't know a lot about intimidation. Not even on the streets. They see what boys intimidating people looks like and and try to emulate it. Given enough time, dedication, and maturity the insecurity is dropped and girls can go pull the weave out dat hoes head without thinking it's not hard enough. Ain't no bitch need to fight like a man.

The other part that is suspicious is the length of the video. Why is it so short?

I am suspicious of all short videos. I assume she wasn't filming or calling the police, because she was breaking the law. How much earlier did the blades come out in the altercation? No idea, but doesn't look like she carries them on her person.

The Rittenhouse narrative that the media tried to drum up made no sensw from the start, it wasn't a case ofnmissing context.

The people that latched onto the narrative didn't need context. They still don't need the (truthful) context, because they already know what they want to believe. That is selfmade's point, but he is polite.

Despite sympathizing with the outrage quite a bit I fear demand for migrant rapists has already exceeded supply. The UK has only been able to openly talk about this for a few years!

Is it an open coworking space in addition to the bootcamp? Or what is there to check out here?

The self-styled 'digital creator'...

Ok, things are starting to coalesce...

This just in:

Now we can reveal the man being threatened is a family man who has been living in the UK for four years – and who was accompanied by his wife on the way to the shops when the incident occurred.

Far from being fresh off a cross-channel small inflatable, as implied by Robinson and Musk, Fatos Ali Dumana, 21, says he came to Britain legally from Bulgaria he and his wife have an eight-month-old baby.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15040815/The-truth-migrant-Dundee-schoolgirl-brandished-knife-wrong-rabble-rousers-Elon-Musk-Tommy-Robinson-were.html

Fatos Ali Dumana -- very Bulgarian, much European ethnicity.

@Quantumfreakonomics @hydroacetylene -- just in case you were wondering.

In the 45 seconds of footage I saw, the girl start out keenly aware that brandishing her weapons on camera is bad, wrong, or illegal. This is why the video starts with her hiding the weapons. Called out, the punk instinct kicks in, and she reveals her weapons.

That's the part that doesn't make sense to me. She doesn't look like she's even trying to be intimidating, and the punk instinct in this specific situation is to run, not to try to scare away a guy twice your size.

The other part that is suspicious is the length of the video. Why is it so short? Ok, maybe this is where he turned on the camera - why isn't it played until the situation is concluded? It obviously belongs to the guy, did he upload it? This soefific cut of it?

Just like it was possible that Kyle Rittenhouse was a white supremacist, and that possibility carries on to the present.

The Rittenhouse narrative that the media tried to drum up made no sense from the start, it wasn't a case ofnmissing context.

-I've never been to an IRL Motte/SSC diaspora meet up but I've always figured you'd have a chance at getting some of the paranoid opsec types with an open invite to some location instead of a direct "lets meet up." Food for thought?

Excellent idea. I will be at Gebhard's Beer Culture in the upper west side, this Saturday (8/30) at 5pm. Happy hour runs until 6. I will stay until at least 7. First round's on me.

I don't know NYC well, so if that's a terrible pick, suggestions are welcome.

I'll be in a black tshirt with shrodinger's cat on it.

Related question: are there any rationalist discords/meetups etc in NYC?

(Assuming that the girl started an interaction and was harassing/intimidating, which we don't know):

But I see no situation where he is actually a positive contributor to the community.

I think there is a case for thinking (not saying) 'fuck you, you little punk. You don't get to scare me out of public spaces. I'll film this for the police.'

I do agree most people would leave, however there is a pro-social element of recording teenage thugs to make public spaces safer. Particularly if they interact with and brandish a weapon at you. Its not for everyone and its probably prudent to just leave things be and tell any police you walk past what happened.

If the kid hadn't initiated an interaction though and the man did (say after spotting she was carrying an axe), well its much harder to justify that in the current zeitgeist.

Edit: Looks like the kid started it (the guy says he has a witness and cctv reviewed by police)

10?

but it's the exact opposite of traditional conservative ideas

Which traditional conservative ideas would those be? "Ensure the means to produce an absurdly vital strategic resource with a lead-up time measured in decades remains possible in $country" is something even minarchists believe the role of government should cover.

It's literally the best case scenario; the US only has one manufacturer of space-magic technology that isn't within trivial striking distance of its enemies. Samsung is, TSMC is, even Intel's own fabs are (the ones it built in Israel).

It seems fair to me.

Because pointing a camera at a 12-year-old girl and following her around while she's clearly trying to disengage is A-tier creepy behaviour.

Is there a video longer than the than the 45 second one? There are a number of types of altercations that result in a Bulgarian man feeling compelled to, provoked into, or choosing to film a girl wielding a couple blades instead of walking away. Potentially, the Bulgarian man was not actually threatened by the encounter, but understood it was illegal, wrong, or entertaining. Most of the scenarios I envisage involve the kid instigating some shit as kids who stash weapons on the block do. Filming obscene, novel, or even dangerous things is now the response I expect from most people. Do it for the gram, fam.

In the 45 seconds of footage I saw, the girl start out keenly aware that brandishing her weapons on camera is bad, wrong, or illegal. I guess whatever preceded this was meant to be for show, but not to show everyone. This is why the video starts with her hiding the weapons. Called out, the punk instinct kicks in, and she reveals her weapons. She must be well educated in the arts of the street, because upon a challenge she chooses to keep it real.. What is she gonna do, stab me? Wu-tang!

There's a possibility that this girl is what many want it to be. Just like it was possible that Kyle Rittenhouse was a white supremacist, and that possibility carries on to the present. Maybe she had ready access to weapons in the land of loicenses because she was practicing for an upcoming tryout for the local HEMA club. Maybe. Perhaps she, to borrow language from people I associate with the outrage, dindu nuffin.

So I'm not beating up on a potential victim I'll pledge $100 to a Scottish youth charity that looks like it goes to underprivileged (white) Scots so long as we find reasonable suspicion the girl in the video is responding to immediate sexual advances by the man filming her. If there's no such of charity I'll ask locals decide where it should go.

'Choppy helps out!' - my sides. He certainly does.

This point reminds me of one of the more bemusing points from my adolescence, which was that during unusual hours, it was relatively common for creepy adult men to sit in their cars around my school and film children and teenagers. They had the angriest, most hateful looks on their faces when they did it. I don't think that they were even (mostly) pedophiles, they came across more as busybodies and paranoiacs, with their attention more directed at boys who could plausibly be mistaken for a threat than at girls. It was a very nice school, too! Just a small and relatively well-hidden-away one that these people could convince themselves was just a random building where teens were congregating and loitering for no reason.

To be fair, though, maybe they actually were pedophiles and they just got those looks on their faces because they noticed that I noticed them. Who knows. Old memory.