domain:badcyber.com
remzem
1d ago
That's incredibly short term thinking. If you win a battle but lose the ability to fight the war it's a bad move strategically. Even if this strike wiped out all the mentioned bases it doesn't mean Iran will never be able to make a nuke ever again. Lose the midterms as is incredibly likely and he'll be even more impotent then he is now for any of his domestic policy. This does nothing to reverse Israel's already rapidly declining status in the west. It won't be long before people start questioning why we send them 4 billion a year, how it benefits us to have a rogue parasite state that manipulates our government into war.
faceh
1d ago
I've been a Panthers fan since literally day one. I grew up going to games at least, eh, once a month? 30 years of waiting, a few false hopes, and now we're cruising along as THE team to beat. Surreal. Last year felt like a dream I could wake up from any minute. This year finally makes it all feel real. Can't lie, I would like us to pull off the three-peat and then maybe ease off a bit to let some other teams (not from Canada) have a shot once again.
I'm not really a fan of the 'dirty play' side of things... but at the same time, hockey traditionally gets way more rough than virtually any other sport out there, so you have to let things play out a bit. One guy roughs up your guy, you rough him back. Your star player(s) are targets, so there is a strategic element of protecting them from aggression. As you noted, players get injuries that would get them pulled in most sports, but they slap some bandages on and get back to it.
The one thing I do wish were more honored was "Don't screw with the goalie." Personally I think they should increase the size of the crease by 50% and generally forbid players who don't have puck possession from entering. Or give the goalie a gun.
I would have gone over to the Parade today, but got stuff to do as an adult. Most of my family is out there, though. Its truly great how the league is generally not very stodgy about (non-illegal) player conduct during the off-season, and they let the cup (well, the copy of it that is designated for this purpose) just go with them to celebrate everything.
The sport has truly spoiled me, I can't really get into any other league. I like College Football for sheer chaos, but where else do you get THIS mix of constrained brutality, teamwork, camaraderie, international rivalry, generally gentlemanly behavior during the off-season, and sheer spectacle?
Greatest spectator sport imaginable. It is barely even close.
The_Nybbler
In the game of roller derby, women aren't just the opposing team; they're the ball.
1d ago
They can close it with their navy, which would have a lifetime measured in days if not hours I expect. They can fire on ships from shore, but any fixed installations won't last long so they'll be left basically being the Houthis of the Straits... except facing a lot more opposition. They could mine the straits, but minesweepers exist. And it's quite possible any minelaying will be met with active opposition. But if they really want to do it and are willing to take a lot of damage, they probably can -- it wasn't possible to remove the Houthi capability without invasion. So if Iran is determined I think they could make this end up with boots on the ground, which would definitely be a loss for the US, though a bigger one for them.
mr_bailey
1d ago
Mines, missiles, and drones? Civil ships are not exactly small targets and Iranian drones have seen some use in Ukraine. Could get ugly. It's likely the gulf states, East/South Asia and to a lesser degree Europe would be more affected then the US (who is, after all, a net oil exporter these days), so this hits US allies (and China, India etc.) much more then the US and Trump hasn't shown a high degree of concern about them...
RollingInMud
1d ago
Could that lead to something similar to 1973 oil crisis, which was yet another nail in the Nixon's coffin? Trump campaigning on reducing inflation and lowering gas prices, he balked at introducing the tariffs on the scale he planned, but here he might not have the leverage.
At the same time, it's a huge boon for Putin, just after his minister of economic development was talking at the Economic Forum in Saint Petersburg of the risk of recession...
Hadad
1d ago
Who exactly is 'they' here?
You don't need to know who is pushing something to notice it's being pushed. There are empirically false claims made about the Holocaust; some of them have even been publicly recognized as false (such as inflated estimates of camp populations). The problem is that all the most scandalous and lurid nonsense gets shared, and becomes common knowledge, even though it's totally bogus. There is a machine that vigorously defends the Holocaust -- both its truths and its myths.
And for the record, memory is notoriously fickle -- a child's even moreso. Trusting the field of history is fine, but you should probably not trust the survivor's testimony too much, especially this long after the events in question.
Lizzardspawn
1d ago
Total informational blackout, facial ID systems and military drones are going to make occupations much less painful.
And then I use some zero day because you vibe coded the software and your own network is busy killing you.
stuckinbathroom
1d ago
Naval mines are one obvious possibility. It’s even conceivable that the mines are already in place, awaiting remote activation—though if they were, I’m sure US/Israeli intelligence would be aware
MaiqTheTrue
Renrijra Krin
1d ago
I’m rather impressed because of the political capital used. This isn’t the kind of decision one should make with an eye to what the people will think about it. If you need to prevent an enemy from getting too powerful to deal with, you need to act even if it is unpopular. An Islamist state with a history of supporting terrorism is not a state that should be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. It’s beyond crazy to me that everyone is worried about poll numbers here when the issue was Iran with access to a weapon that could kill millions.
stuckinbathroom
1d ago
Hadad
1d ago
I believe you! Which countries are those? If there are still nations out there where the wealthy men are reproducing and the poor aren't, we could learn something from them.
Lizzardspawn
1d ago
Here a Premier London agent named, Sigismund Neumann kept the large diamond for safe keeping. When they transported the large diamond, they had to take extreme measures to keep it safe. The Cullinan was sent in a plain box via parcel post while detectives from London were asked to transport a replica as a decoy publically.
They have 500kg of the good stuff. That is 25 liters of uranium. It takes two plain vans. In the chaos after a strike with all the ambulances, contractors that repair and so on it is easy to be lost in the fray IF you have guys that can keep their mouths shut and their signatures are not too visible. You only need couple of embedded guys there with the proper credentials to take over the uranium when it hits the fan.
RollingInMud
1d ago
why this airstrike is grounds for impeachment whereas all the other airstrikes and drone attacks over the decades weren't
Just like with attempts to impeach Biden over his "corruption" (while Trump exhibiting levels of corruption comparable to Russian oligarchs) -- the only analysis that can be provided is sociological or political, not legal. It can be summarized as "your side did it". And also -- it'll be popular with voters.
I have denied being a "neo-Nazi", although I accept that in common parlance "anti-Semitic White identitarian" is the operative definition of neo-Nazi, and if that's the definition then sure? National Socialism is a defunct pan-German nationalist movement, I don't identify with it and I don't support German nationalism or any petty European nationalism.
Yes, everybody here does know my views because I don't hide them. The accusation that I secretly want all the Jews killed just because I give cultural criticism towards Jews in a similar nature as Jews like Ignatiev constantly levy against whites is simply your attempt to enforce a social consensus making any criticism of Jews taboo. I reject your social consensus, I have and will engage in critique of Jewish identity in behavior in similar nature and measure as Jews do towards Whites. I'm not hiding any beliefs.
The notion that I criticize Jewish identity and behavior and people like you hysterically yell that I secretly want to kill all the Jews is a byproduct of the exact cultural forces I am criticizing. You can't accept that I just have a political and cultural opposition to their influence in politics and culture, that's impossible in your mind. And instead of arguing against my opposition you attack positions I don't hold and claim I secretly hold them.
Lizzardspawn
1d ago
Close with what exactly? Until they sort out their air defenses everything they have there will be sitting ducks.
Bleep
1d ago
60% enriched uranium isn't itself a violation of the NPT
Israel isn't a NPT member state.
the United States is
Crowstep
1d ago
Who exactly is 'they' here?
The survivors, the soldiers who liberated the camps and the historians who studied the Holocaust afterwards are not the ones doing the censoring. Governments (and not most governments) censor Holocaust denial because they know that the only people who question the historical facts do so because they hate Jews, and hating Jews caused the Nazis to kill six million of them. We can argue whether censorship is the right approach or not, but its mere existence isn't evidence that the Holocaust was exaggerated or made up. To believe otherwise fails in the same way that all true conspiracy theories fail, it requires too much coordination from too many people over too long.
Bleep
1d ago
they move them into the area for use and decided the risk profile was too high against the Houthis so instead they used almost entirely standoff munitions
faceh
1d ago
You're absolutely on point that the early 90's was clearly not a stable equilibrium, as it still led us to where we are.
But, no joke, the change that I think screwed us in a few different ways was The Student Loan Reform Act of 1993.
This made it FAR simpler for the average citizen to get student loans regardless of financial situation or the academic path they chose... or the economic viability of their major.
You can flipping SEE THE INFLECTION POINT when student loans became way more common and thus more people attended college on loans.
So I'd suggest this has a number of impacts:
-
Women start attending college more often. Which has them burn more of their most fertile years, and the added debt load makes them less appealing as partners and less able to support kids.
-
Men start accruing more debt too, which stunts their personal wealth acquisition in their 20's and thus makes them less appealing to women... and just less able to support a partner/kids in general.
-
Obviously this allows economically nonviable majors like "Women's studies" to grow, which has some clear downstream impacts.
-
Probably causes women's standards to rise, they wouldn't accept a partner without a degree if they have one.
-
Of course turned College into the 'default' life path rather than hopping into a career and getting married as the best practice for advancing socially.
So putting us back to the status-quo ante of 1990, and NOT expanding access to loans for college, we might be able to avoid the worst excesses of Feminism entering the mainstream. I dunno.
1994 also saw The Gender Equity in Education Act which made it actual policy to push for more education programs geared towards women, and might be attributable to the general decline in male performance in school, which would then play into the college issue.
And the 1994 Violence Against Women Act which I'm definitely not saying was a bad idea, but might have shifted incentives that led to, e.g. the eventual MeToo movement.
Lizzardspawn
1d ago
This will happen only in ground war with Iran. Serbia bombings didn't hurt clinton. And let's be clear - MAGA americans love those kind of display of american might mic drops. As long as the bodycount is 0 and the involvement short - it may even net him votes.
faceh
1d ago
Dependsssss because in some of those environments, the wealthy men just stack up as many wives as they can afford and the less wealthy guys have go out and steal their brides from abroad or something.
remzem
1d ago
I'm surprised how much political capital he was willing to spend on this. No clear evidence that their nuclear program is knocked out, a pretty strong incentive now between the outcomes of Libya, North Korea, Israel and Iran for any country that doesn't want to be a colony of either the eastern or western bloc to develop nukes. Meanwhile half his base is in open rebellion against him and his biggest source of support right now are Mark Levin type republicans which all of the younger "joe rogan" base despises.
You could almost draw a straight line between the republican party being overthrown by the populists and the Iraq / Afghan wars. Of all the mental gymnastics the base will commit to polish up his obvious faults I don't think he will get a pass here. He's pretty much lost the republicans Joe Rogan viewership numbers of votes. It does make the claims of Israel having compromising intel on him seem more likely.
Can add to that this kills Tulsi Powell, Rubio, and maybe even Vance's future prospects as well. George W. Trump pictures being spammed all over his x posts.
Like what really?
American soldiers stationed in the pacific used airplanes to churn ice cream (mount on the wing use some kind of RAM turbine to stir, fly high for one hour), and they converted the excess ships into ice cream supplies for the fleet.
More options
Context Copy link