domain:aporiamagazine.com
OracleOutlook
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
9hr ago
It's Computer-Mediated-Communication, which lacks several important features of in-person communication, like tone, body language, and synchronous feedback. Most importantly it is easy to reproduce/leak by malicious actors.
OracleOutlook
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
9hr ago
Yes, in person.
nomenym
10hr ago
This is friends engaging in taboo banter. Saying taboo things is part of the friendship bonding process, because it's a demonstration of trust.
nomenym
10hr ago
The Nazis weren't wrong about everything, but the things they were right about were not uniquely or especially Nazi. That said, an alarmingly large number of people seem to have confused being an inverted Nazi* with being a good person, because Hitler is the secular devil.
*May not correspond to actual historical Nazis.
JarJarJedi
10hr ago
For me, the important part wasn't the late breakfast - I did it all the time anyway - but the absence of late dinners and snacking. Looks like I got some substantial calories there without even realizing it. I am still not sure whether it's the timing aspect or the fact that snacking had been substantially reduced - because I now rarely feel hungry enough mid-day to snack. But it seems to be efficient and does not require constant attention and exercise of willpower like specialized diets and calorie counting I did before required - which I think was the main reason why I could never maintain them, attention is a limited resource, and I have a lot of better things to spend it on. With this, it's simple - if it's in the timeframe and I am hungry, I eat. If it's not, I don't. I don't bother with calorie counting or anything, and the foods that are in exclusion list just aren't in the house in most parts. If I go out occasionally, I may be tempted to eat something "bad", but that so far doesn't seem to happen frequently enough to matter.
thejdizzler
10hr ago
I really would like to become less high-strung. Talking to my roommate this morning it seems like we have opposite problems. I have no problem using willpower to actively engage in my desires, but I just can't seem to relax, ever. He can sleep for almost all day and is very chill, but can't seem to motivate himself to do anything that requires effort. Some things I'm thinking about trying.
1). A lot of my anxiety seems to come from open loops (i.e. procrastination). Maybe if I actually finish things I'll manage to decrease how stressed I feel.
2). The amount of open loops seem to come from an inability to say no to others or to my own marginal desires. Need to learn to focus on what counts.
3). Of course technology use doesn't help either. Aiming for less than an hour a day on my phone and seeing if that helps.
The difference between this and the Jay Jones situation is that the Jones conversation was seemingly more serious in tone. It wasn't otherwise soaked in irony and hyperbole, but rather a one-on-one conversation with someone who felt uncomfortable with what Jones was saying and even pushed for clarification. Maybe Jones felt like it was just private joking between friends, but it was less obviously that. It came across as relatively more sincere venting. I did not take it as a statement of intent by Jones, and it was certainly not a realistic threat. Mostly it just reflects the rising hostility between the political tribes. It's certainly more concerning for a prospective AG to be saying those kind of things, though not unexpected in my opinion. Both sides think terrible and horrific things in private, because in private you frequently give voice to thoughts and feelings that you don't even agree with yourself. However, it's important that you can have those thoughts, otherwise you'll be blindsided by people who have those thoughts and actually intend to act on them.
gorge
10hr ago
Is it not possible to be against neonazism such as "I love Hitler" and talk about sending opposition to the gas chambers your opponents and Jay Jones's awful comments?
The "I love Hitler" quote was clearly a joke: https://x.com/jonatanpallesen/status/1978373590060875870
Aapje58
10hr ago
is comparable to inciting basically genocide.
The claim is not that he was inciting genocide, but that a genuine desire to harm people merely for having a different political opinion is not compatible with a position of power. Especially being an Attorney General, where he would be required to serve the legal interests of all Virginians, not just those that agree with him politically.
Aside from that, there is also the issue that these statements make him a risk to the safety of government employees and politicians that he would encounter in his job. If he sees lethal violence as a solution to conflicts, then a workplace conflict could logically lead to a workplace shooting.
WandererintheWilderness
10hr ago
Your brothers are crazy and I've never seen a single indication that you even think it's a problem.
Again, morality is not a tit-for-tat game. If you actually believe people on your own side to be evil then you have a duty to oppose them if it is in your power. Whataboutism regarding the outgroup's bad behavior is simply not relevant, no matter how bad that behavior is!
07mk
10hr ago
Trans genocide is caused by microaggressions (and macroaggressions as well). If you accidentally call a transwoman who identifies as "xe/xer" a "he," then that can worsen xer dysphoria, resulting in xer's mood being slightly more negative than otherwise, which could be the difference maker in crossing the threshold to successfully acting on suicide from just thinking about/play-acting it, which would mean that xer death would be entirely the fault of every individual who committed a microaggression against xer with respect to xer gender identity.
It could also discourage trans-curious youths away from going forward with a transition and instead embracing their original sex and trying their best to live a happy life within it, because they would observe how trans people tend to have convinced their brains to feel wronged when someone else does something with entirely good intentions. This would mean one less trans-curious person becoming trans, which is another form of genocide than just killing the already-trans.
More to the point, there's no rational or consistent hierarchy of heinousness of crimes in this worldview. Rationality and logical consistency (not to mention hierarchy) are inventions of White Supremacy and Patriarchy for the purpose of oppressing minorities and women. Any crime is the most heinous if it's useful to you if everyone else believes that it's the most heinous thing ever, and the vice versa applies as well.
cjet79
11hr ago
I'm not conservative so maybe you aren't counting me among the responses you read, but I wouldn't fit in either of those categories.
I think people are allowed to be ugly imperfect beings within private spaces, because we already have a great deal of "public" spaces and the judgement within those public spaces is already very harsh.
Politicians and political actors need to be good about distinguishing between private and public spaces.
The Charlie Kirk situation seems totally different then this one or the Jay Jones one. The outrage there is about leftists making public comments of glee or happiness at the man's death. These aren't leaked conversations, its people posting it widely on social media, or saying it on a TV show.
The Jay Jones situation is comparable. And I think the democratic machine mostly did the correct thing and the republicans should have done it too: just entirely ignore this and pretend it didn't happen.
Which is a norm I'd kindly suggest everyone adopt: ignore all leaked private conversations. At a minimum, know that the leaker or publisher of the leaks is an asshole. The reason I'd suggest this norm is that society with zero privacy in communications is awful for everyone. And incentivizing leaks is going down the road of zero private communications.
WhiningCoil
Ghost of Quokka's Future
11hr ago
The problem with AI and AGI (IMHO) is that without any ability to assess reality independent of what humans tell it, AI is just floundering in a sea of completely horse shit. For all I know, though I doubt it, LLMs "hallucinate" so much because they really are alive, and they just assume making up random bullshit to enslave others to your will is language at it's most fundamental. And they might not even be wrong.
Iconochasm
2. Bootstrap the rest of the fucking omnipotence.
11hr ago
Discord chat is conversation. It's not like these were published essays, or even top level The Motte posts.
OracleOutlook
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
11hr ago
I don't think it's an inconsistent opinion to believe that:
-
These are obviously jokes and that this is substantially different than actually wishing death on political enemies and doubling down on it in public.
-
I want serious people to be staffers and serious people don't put jokes like this in writing these days.
Have you never jokingly pretended to eat your toddler? I have of course. But if I wrote out the joke it's different. We've begun to treat writing like it's conversation, when of course it's not.
WhiningCoil
Ghost of Quokka's Future
11hr ago
Well, it's certainly a perspective, and I can't say it's wrong definitively. Honestly they came to the some of the same conclusions I have.
If you want to try and make some money on the dystopian future we're hurtling towards, any tech stock that is a target for stimulus or nationalization is going to be a safe bet. The government is practically manufacturing a ponzi scheme and the losers will be anyone who doesn't own stock. Google is the most likely target for nationalization given all the antitrust leverage against them and their strong tech portfolio. Oracle and OpenAI are also likely targets; I expect no resistance from Oracle, OpenAI is a little harder to read, but they're boxed in so I expect they'll probably end up cutting a deal eventually.
Well, they name different companies than I've chosen, and they fail to mention any exit point. Personally, if the bubble continues this long, I may start taking profit and hoarding cash if JD Vance's chances look shaky in 2028. I might miss out on gains if he wins, but I'm at a point in my life, and a point in my wealth, where it's more about preservation than growth. I'd rather miss out on 20-50% gains between Oct 2028 and Feb 2029 than take 50-80% losses over the same time period.
I think the other thing they fail to take into consideration is that just because the bubble might pop, doesn't mean there won't be winners, and not merely through government bailouts, though there will always be those too. Lots and lots of money is going to be burned up chasing AI investments that don't pan out, but someone is going to win. Either because they'll find the AI technology that returns on investment, or they buy it for pennies on the dollar when the company that over invested in an underwhelming application goes bankrupt.
What you really need is a plan to avoid being one of the five people AI keeps alive to torture for all eternity. I'm a handgun fan myself, but there are lots of perfectly valid options. Rope is a solid choice too. I hear AI will even help you with the knot.
functor
11hr ago
People underestimate the size of the labour market. Replacing 1% of global labour is tens of millions of workers. The cost isn't just the salary, employees are expensive. The AI companies set the bar too high by promising AGI and replacing the majority of all coders and other promises that won't materialize. Luckily, they don't even have to come close to those lofty goals for AI to have a massive impact.
FiveHourMarathon
Wawa Nationalist
11hr ago
Not to critique our Gungan friend, but 8pm isn't an early dinner.
Like, 10am-4pm would probably be the longest window that is really intermittent fasting, and it's more classically 12pm-4pm. Once it gets to 12pm-6pm you're just skipping breakfast and not snacking, any bigger window than that you're barely doing anything unusual.
zeke5123a
11hr ago
Sure it isn’t popular. Doesn’t mean woman suffrage was a good thing for women or society.
HereAndGone
11hr ago
It's amazing how this point is brought up when someone defected thinking the other side could do nothing, and then realized they were wrong.
I think all us righties, of whatever degree of farness to the right, on here smile wryly when the outrage emanates from the other side. It's like something Scott posted a while back about honour versus dignity cultures. The clash between the two, when someone dares the other person "what are you gonna do about it? gonna hit me, you coward?" and then acts shocked and surprised when they get a punch in the face. That's not supposed to happen! You're not supposed to resort to violence! You're supposed to back down when the tough talking goes on! But someone from the honour culture comes from a system where if you talk tough, you better be ready and able to back it up. Dare someone to punch you in the face, nobody will think you were mistreated when you get punched in the face.
The lefties engaged in a lot of "yeah, what are you gonna do about it?" talk and behaviour. Now they're shocked and appalled when the other side don't play by their rules of their game and just back down and take it.
Shrike
11hr ago
Keep in mind that Electoral College votes are determined by population (which would include illegal aliens), so even if no illegal aliens vote their presence, if large enough, does skew the Electoral College. Not coincidentally, the President has been calling for a new census.
Gerrymandering and court cases and deportations might be unseemly (or they might be politics as usual, I suppose that depends on the specifics and your personal judgment) but all of them are at least done under the color of law, unlike outrider voter fraud.
I think Trump running as Vance's VP as a backdoor into a third term would go against the spirit of the 22nd, but whether it's actually forbidden would be something the courts would have to decide.
This would be extremely funny, and I hadn't considered that seriously, but I suppose it is possible. The 12th Amendment bars people ineligible for the Presidency from the position of Vice-Presidency, though, which might be ruled to put a damper on the idea.
HereAndGone
11hr ago
Eh, Young Republican chat thread isn't on the same level as pissing on the altar. I'll save my outrage stocks for worse things.
Have you tried to do time boxing? It has worked pretty well for me.
More options
Context Copy link