site banner
Advanced search parameters (with examples): "author:quadnarca", "domain:reddit.com", "over18:true"

Showing 25 of 2262 results for

domain:shapesinthefog.substack.com

Another interesting comment from the Substack:

Jessica Lopez

As a parent of 3 kids from the Brownsville Campus I can tell you this model does not work for EVERYONE. There are some commonalities among their success stories and that is income and background. 85% of the Low SES students from the Brownsville Campus that started at the school in 2022 are no longer there and its not due to lack of "motivation" or ability. This is a good option for those whom its model is targeting but not a silver bullet as replacement for our current failing educational system.

There are a lot of reasons families struggled with this model. Reasons the school never addressed, likely because they were too busy with their marketing machine. After reading this article, it’s hard not to conclude that income and background played a major role in how families experienced ALPHA. They’re used to serving families who can relocate across the country and afford $40,000 per child to “try out” a revolutionary school. But that’s not who we are. We’re families living paycheck to paycheck, with different life experiences and different starting points. That doesn’t mean our kids weren’t capable of success, far from it! It just means they had to work twice as hard to adapt to ALPHA’s rigid model.

This article brings up a lot of valid concerns, but I saw firsthand how much more deeply these issues impacted kids from our background, especially around the concept of "motivation." and their buggy tech.

N=3 and all, but that isn't promising for their method scaling any time soon.

Higer education may result in lower rates of cumming inside, but that doesn't matter if what you are measuring is is the rate of conception vs rate of cumming inside when doing so could be expected to result in conception.

The only thing I remember about elementary (homeschool co-op) Spanish class is making hot chocolate with the hand carved mixer and singing a chocolate song in Spanish.

That's the proposal. The answer to "I know this guy is going to do something bad but I can't prove it in court, so I want to take away his rights anyway" is "no". That's true whether it's liberty, speech, or guns.

While I'm glad that weed helped you, I have good reason to believe that that's a rather unexpected/idiosyncratic response.

For most people with depression, I'd go as far as to say it's highly inadvisable:

Meta-analysis showed a higher risk of depression among cannabis users (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.13–1.46).

This isn't entirely causal, as there's some evidence that people with a predisposition towards depression are more likely to try weed in the first place. Yet I think the evidence is there, and in particular, there's little evidence of it helping reduce depression.

ecstacy was also being trialled at the time in Australia, I wonder why it didn't take off like psilocybin

What I've heard on the grape-vine is that there are quite a few trials ongoing. I googled it, and they've got some big names involved.

A number of trials have concluded, with, as far as I can tell by eye-balling them quickly promising results.

Unfortunately, adoption just takes time. Not all psychiatrists are as open to the idea of psychedelics as I am. While not a psychedelic, ketamine was only relatively recently approved in the UK for depression, and it's a pain to acquire in the NHS.

Not to mention the lack of a profit motive. Most of them are unpatentable, hence pharma companies aren't really raring to go to produce them.

And I've met plenty of schizophrenics who were triggered by pot. It's not a gamble I'd suggest others take

I've looked at the figures, and that's very rare! Remember, you're looking at schizophrenics who you have reason to believe were triggered by pot. What we ought to be considering are people without known schizophrenia, what are the risks they develop it after trying pot?

That figure is very low. Probably in the sub 0.1% or lower range.

Even within schizophrenics, a study in Denmark found that only ~ 6-8% of schizophrenia cases were induced by weed.

There's also a strong dose dependence here, I would expect that even vulnerable people wouldn't be too affected by a small amount of weed. Unfortunately, potencies have only increased over time.

I wouldn't lose any sleep over it, but I'm not a big fan of weed because it can be habit forming, blunts cognition and just makes you lazy-ass drug if you take it regularly.

Okay? So ban porn advertising on any site that targets children. I'm pretty sure that law isn't even necessary because websites have a lot more control over their ads than stores have over their neighborhood.

If a city council sorted their areas by crime rate and excluded adult bookstores from the bottom X%, then I'm pretty sure the (prospective) store owners would have a good case the restrictions are illegal. If the city pulled all its cops and banned private security from them, it would be a slam-dunk case.

Forget the Duolingo. It looks like most of the "teaching" this school does is plopping the kids in front of computer education modules that give them feedback on the problems. One wonders why they need "guides" who make 100k a year to not teach them. Presumably the effect of a good teacher is proportional to the amount of teaching they actually do.

Asian tiger parent culture is different due to bugman conformalism. They send their kids to extra lessons to get ahead in public school, the same one normal kids go to. Not this abomination that this parent is getting into.

Wtf my spanish class never had field trips to the taqueria

PP seems to show up in lots of anecdotes about cross-sex hormone prescriptions, especially for trans minors with relatively few questions asked. As far as I can tell (see SCOTUS thread) those are rather controversial. But I can't say what fraction of their business that is.

I... don't actually know what we can do about it, other than to let the blue tribe shrivel up and die from the low fertility this produces.

Considering this guy has three kids, this plan isn't panning out in this case.

Like you say though, the dose makes the poison, and there's always a risk. I had a bit of a similar experience with pot to your experience with mushrooms. For a long time I followed the advice of the doctors - I'd always refuse it when offered because of its well recognised effects on people like me. But about a decade ago my depression felt overwhelming and that was around the time psychedelics were showing promising results (ecstacy was also being trialled at the time in Australia, I wonder why it didn't take off like psilocybin?) so I wanted to try mushrooms or LSD, but I didn't know anyone who had access and couldn't get into a trial due to my condition. So in a desperate move to just feel something different, I tried pot.

It has basically fixed me. Ok it was probably the CBD and that's hyperbole, I still have the paranoia and the over inclusive reasoning and holistic bias, but I regret not trying it sooner with all my heart. I have stability, a community I love and who has my back, and I no longer need anti-anxiety, anti-depressant or anti-psychotic medication. But I was never taking massive doses - even when I wanted to get high I'm too paranoid to tolerate the cognitive impact.

Also I don't blame the doctors or anything - they were doing the best they could with the information available to them, and people are unique. But like prima said, it's under-researched. In fact to counter balance what I just said, my brother (who is mentally healthy) also avoided pot for the same reason, but accidentally ate an edible while visiting our uncle and came close to disassociating completely and reckons it took him half a year to get over it. And I've met plenty of schizophrenics who were triggered by pot. It's not a gamble I'd suggest others take.

No, it's actually just correct. Being a citizen of the US is a reward for anyone not entitled to it by blood. We're the best. Everyone knows it.

I have family members who lived in the United States for over a decade, on permanent visas. They went there for work, and undoubtedly contributed to American prosperity. Their presence was completely legal.

Eventually they were offered pathways to American citizenship.

They refused, because they didn't want to be American citizens. They wanted to leave and come back home to Australia, which they eventually did. They sometimes still visit the US for business reasons, but only for short stays. They tell me quite frankly that they prefer living in Australia and view Australian citizenship as preferable to American.

Are they wrong?

Reading the motte could certainly be damaging to some minors. I wonder how many people would participate if they had to send a picture of their driving license to the mods first.

I wouldn't mind, I'd just be looking at my own driving license.

Hmm.. I wonder if there's room for "creative" thinking here. Every new member is automatically promoted to mod status temporarily, verifies their own ID, and then resigns with dignity before becoming a normal participant.

Yeah same with alcohol bro. How many people die from drunk driving every year?

Agreed, clinical trials are just a bullshit way to approach these drugs/medicines imo.

For you personally, yeah go on a forest walk and get into nature. That’s the real way to experience these drugs and most likely to have a positive life changing experience.

If you’re really ADD and need stimulation, maybe just go to a music festival then?

I'm not sure that you're hearing what I'm saying. In 1890 it would have been normal to say 'so, you've been seeing my daughter for three months already, do you need her ring size?' The shortness of the courtship and the reminders from dad as to the reason for dating in the first place was a big part of how the whole shotgun wedding mentality worked.

Private schools in my area typically cost in the 30s to 40k per year.

There isn't a crime rate minimum for opening an adult bookstore.

No. But typically they can't be near schools, parks, houses of worship, other areas frequented by children etc.

They are excluded from some areas because of the nuisance they bring.

Sure but that's vastly different.

"We're in a good faith relationship, and a pregnancy results, and we decide to move our timeline forward and get serious."

Has little in common with

"He thinks we're just having fun, I'm hoping to have his baby and force him to get serious."

That person is not me.

If Congress didn't declare war, committing an act of war is illegal and unconstitutional.

No it is not. You are welcome to provide a single precedent confirming otherwise, and the list of Presidents prosecuted for Vietnam, Korea, Libya, Grenada, Panama, Yugoslavia, and similar military actions. I don't even require a conviction - a mere holding by any appropriate judicial authority, such as SCOTUS, that all these usages of military were illegal, and that the Supreme Commander of the Military has no rights to use the military without congressional vote, would suffice. Absent that, I will be forced to conclude you pulled this judicial opinion from some place where you have tattoos - which is usually not a good source of judicial opinions.

I got it from carefully reading my tattoo of the US constitution.

No you did not, unless of course Article 2 is tatooed in some place that is hard for you to reach. And even if you did, US jurisprudence somewhat developed since 1789, and one of the things that has been well established and confirmed by numerous precedent is the power of the President to employ the military. It is not absolute - if you have some un-tatooed places left, you can probably fit War Powers Act somewhere. After you are done with that, you may think about why the Congress required the President to merely notify them in 48 hours about something that you claim is completely illegal and unconstitutional - and then gives them 60 days to keep doing it, and then another 30 days to keep doing it. Is Congress really unaware that it all has been illegal from the start? Did you do you civil duty and tell them so they could fix this colossal blunder?

I didn't get this from whatever fantasy of Democratic talking points you're imagining

My imagination is so powerful that is reflected on TV, in major Democratic newspapers and in many speeches of Democratic politician. How stupid of me to imagine this silliness instead of using my vast powers to imagine myself a billionaire!

Can somebody classpill me on contraception? Class considerations on this are utterly foreign to me beyond "back street abortions with makeshift implements and voodoo herbs = desperate and/or ignorant" and "rhythm method = Catholic".

Ken Paxton is not running for reelection(he wants to be a senator instead) and only targeting homosexuals and pornsites is... very like him anyways.

"We won't enforce the 10k USD/day, promise , unless it gets too gay" is putting a lot of trust in Ken Paxton.

EDIT: I agree that he very probably won't go after the vast majority of such websites. I also think the only thing limiting him from picking up the weakest-looking inmate and slamming them into the wall is wanting to get some as-applied challenges settled first, and the one-in-one-hundred risk of that will make a lot of changes in behavior.